the difference part 2. .. quadtrilogy? QUAD-TRI-logy? Dumbass. the difference part 2 quadtrilogy? QUAD-TRI-logy? Dumbass
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (707)
[ 707 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#29 - PsycoEmu
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
quadtrilogy?
QUAD-TRI-logy?



Dumbass.
User avatar #31 to #29 - Zedonius
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
'twas a joke, good sir.
User avatar #38 to #31 - HarryPotterJunkie
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
twas an epic fail you twat
User avatar #43 to #38 - Zedonius
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
How amusing. Being referred to as a twat by a someone who claims the name of 'HarryPotterJunkie', and delights in replying comments that have little to do with him. I advise you to keep practicing your spells, because if you think that of me, then I foresee it being a decent amount of time before you know what a real twat is.
#224 to #43 - anon id: ec260089
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]


Soooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo





Basically you used a bunch of big words to make everyone think that because he likes Harry Potter he's a twat. "How amusing"? Honestly, how old are you? 13? 14? I hate people who try to use fancy phrases to make themselves look smart when they just end up looking like an idiot. So now you gonna make fun of me for delighting in replying to comments that have little to do with me?
User avatar #238 to #224 - Zedonius
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
No. But I could make fun of you for thinking that any of the words in my previous comment were "big" words, or that "how amusing" is a fancy phrase. The only people who would believe such a foolish thought are people with a limited vocabulary. Also, I wasn't making fun of him; I was stating a point I surmised from his user name. And, believe it or not, I talk like this on a daily basis. Evening to you, Anon.
User avatar #44 to #43 - HarryPotterJunkie
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
Nice comeback, I see you put a lot of thou-JUST...SHUT...YOUR-WHORE-MOUTH
User avatar #41 - LazerFish
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
Q:Is this funny?
User avatar #72 to #41 - flappyduck
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
A:NO ITS BASICLY FOR PICTURES THAT EVERY ONE HAS SEEN (REPOST) PUT INTO ONE (COMPILATION)
User avatar #329 - godslam
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
Thumb me down or call me gay, but I like Taylor Lautner. He's not a greasy, hobo-looking douchebag that plays a sparkly ass-tard. I don't mind him at all. It's just everyone else in the movies that bothers me.
#533 to #329 - xNoPityx **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#2 - dankbuds **User deleted account**
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
whats the difference between me and you?
about five bank accounts
three ounces
and two vehicles
User avatar #353 - Obscurity
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
I know I'm gonna get thumbed down to hell and back for this, but why does everyone hate on robert pattinson? It's stephanie meyers that wrote the damn books, pattinson was just doing his job. :/

(prepares for thumbs down)
User avatar #358 to #353 - dudester
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
Because he looks like a foot.

(Gives thumbs down that were being prepared for)
User avatar #382 to #353 - jaquewells
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
He is actually a good actor, he just isn't allowed to use it... ever..
He only saw twilight about two weeks ago, and even he said it was ****.
#361 to #353 - CrossFireSR **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
(Gives unexpected thumbs up)
User avatar #36 - HarryPotterJunkie
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
First off, star wars is not a saga. The definition of saga is a polish poem written circa 1600. Fail.
#40 to #36 - lightwolfess **User deleted account**
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
User avatar #629 - docterchese
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
a quadtrilogy? wtf! quintology! quadtrilogy is literally a four-three-trilogy.
User avatar #632 to #629 - Xedan
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
so that'd be, what, 12 books them?
User avatar #642 to #629 - Impartialobserver
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
Isn't it a quartet? Or is that term only used when describing music groups?
#396 - anon id: 9baa91c5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
Jacob's better than Edward.

But yer, I laughed at that, even though I'm Team Jacob.

But it IS a good series...
The movies ruin it...
User avatar #397 to #396 - LuisIsDaShiz
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
get...

the...

****

OUT!!!!!!!!!
#405 to #397 - RUSSIANROFLCOPTER
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
*takes #396 by the balls and throws him out the window*
User avatar #32 - devinme
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
Who even started calling Twilight a saga anyways?
#39 to #32 - lightwolfess **User deleted account**
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/28/2010) [-]
Meyer did. Speaking of who, MAN THE HARPOONS
#427 - MrMacky **User deleted account**
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(06/29/2010) [-]
MMkay I understand that twilight/jonas bros/justin bieber is gay. Why do we need to be reminded of it every three seconds?