Click to expand
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - onyxleigion (09/23/2013) [-]
You morons need this explained apparently.
They took two pictures.
One of just the landscape.
The other with the girl.
Then they edited what was behind the girl onto the mirror.
User avatar #17 to #5 - mrslippyfist (09/23/2013) [-]
no i think the mirror is held at a slight angle so the cameraman is not in the pic
#6 to #5 - icecreamonnips (09/23/2013) [-]
or just a skinny girl holding a mirror?
#9 to #6 - anonymous (09/23/2013) [-]
But no legs reflected so I see a flaw in your reasoning good sir.
#7 to #6 - onyxleigion (09/23/2013) [-]
The camera would be in the picture, that's why eveyone is freaking out.. not to mention the leaves in the "mirror" line up with the ones behind her.
#8 to #7 - stormtrooperface (09/23/2013) [-]
could have been taken at an angle. and as for the tree it could have been another tree, although I'm not saying you are wrong just didn't want you to be right. because I love you.
#14 to #8 - hillbillypowpow (09/23/2013) [-]
but the treeline is in the mirror.
#15 to #14 - hillbillypowpow (09/23/2013) [-]
with matching foliage.
 Friends (0)