Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#5 - onyxleigion
Reply +17
(09/23/2013) [-]
You morons need this explained apparently.
They took two pictures.
One of just the landscape.
The other with the girl.
Then they edited what was behind the girl onto the mirror.
#17 to #5 - mrslippyfist
Reply 0
(09/23/2013) [-]
no i think the mirror is held at a slight angle so the cameraman is not in the pic
#6 to #5 - icecreamonnips
Reply +3
(09/23/2013) [-]
or just a skinny girl holding a mirror?
#9 to #6 - anon
Reply 0
(09/23/2013) [-]
But no legs reflected so I see a flaw in your reasoning good sir.
#7 to #6 - onyxleigion
Reply +3
(09/23/2013) [-]
The camera would be in the picture, that's why eveyone is freaking out.. not to mention the leaves in the "mirror" line up with the ones behind her.
#8 to #7 - stormtrooperface
Reply -1
(09/23/2013) [-]
could have been taken at an angle. and as for the tree it could have been another tree, although I'm not saying you are wrong just didn't want you to be right. because I love you.
#14 to #8 - hillbillypowpow
Reply 0
(09/23/2013) [-]
but the treeline is in the mirror.
#15 to #14 - hillbillypowpow
Reply 0
(09/23/2013) [-]
with matching foliage.