Guns make us less safe. .. Secret service members requirements: Pass background checks, trained in proper uses and safety of firearms, and whole lot of other . Gun ownership requirements:
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Guns make us less safe

  • Recommend tagsx
Views: 18773
Favorited: 13
Submitted: 09/20/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to schnizel E-mail to friend submit to reddit



Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #20 - TARDIS (09/21/2013) [+] (26 replies)
Secret service members requirements: Pass background checks, trained in proper uses and safety of firearms, and whole lot of other **** .

Gun ownership requirements:
User avatar #27 - megazman (09/21/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Right because you need as much protection as the president...
#26 - satanlovesyou (09/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
missed one
User avatar #18 - GodofTV (09/21/2013) [+] (5 replies)
You have to be smart to be in the secret service, most Americans are ******* retarded. Don't deny it, I'm American and I acknowledge this. The sooner we all accept it the sooner we can start to better ourselves.
User avatar #31 - actinglead (09/21/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Um... I think there should be more gun laws only for how to get guns. Like to pass an APA mental health test, stronger background checks, and even a certain amount of hours in training. Like if they require license for cosmetologist that requires many hours per year of training to keep (even after they have the license). Then why can't we have something like that for gun owners.
User avatar #64 - wersand (09/21/2013) [-]
And I bet every single one of those people had to go through extensive training to carry it, and they don't let their kids at home play with them willy nilly. And they have all had tests to make sure that they are mentally stable.
User avatar #13 - KayRed (09/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
**** logic. He's way more likely to be a target than your average citizen.
#14 to #13 - nightstar (09/21/2013) [-]
Weird. I think more average citizens have been targets since he took office...
#75 - angelusprimus (09/21/2013) [-]
I have no problem with every law abiding citizen having a weapon.
I have one, I go to shooting range to practice every second weekend.
What makes us less safe is not weapons, its the fact that there is a huge number of people that think anyone should be able to have as many guns of any type with absolutely no regulation.
**** that.
Paranoid schizophrenics should not be able to get a gun. People with history of violent assaults should not have a gun. People suffering from extreme PTSD shouldn't have one until they get help for their condition.
Guns are not the cause of violence, people are. But guns make violence easy. So if we are just smart about it, don't go into extremes of "Everyone gets guns of every type!" or "No one gets any guns!" we could make our country far more safe. Just like we don't let blind people drive we shouldn't let people who can't handle it have guns.
#66 - ninjamyles **User deleted account** (09/21/2013) [+] (4 replies)
oh, so your still beating on this horse.
User avatar #32 - ivoryhammer (09/21/2013) [-]
Can we just not post political/religious ******** on here and focus on the funny?
User avatar #8 - sarisdoran (09/20/2013) [+] (2 replies)
You forgot the snipers on the roof behind them.
#1 - unncommon ONLINE (09/20/2013) [+] (9 replies)
I've already seen this, but it's still true none the less.
>inb4 this isn't necessarily a republican thing
It's a reaction image, chill.
User avatar #98 - EmoHairflip ONLINE (09/21/2013) [-]
The government should possess more firepower than the people.. You can't exactly own anti-aircraft weapons and tanks, but the government can. You're comparing apples to cake here.
#82 - knowstoomuch (09/21/2013) [+] (10 replies)
Oh right. Because it's not like anyone has ever tried to murder the president of the united states.
User avatar #83 to #82 - threadz (09/21/2013) [-]
And it's not like anyone has tried to murder someone who isn't the president.
User avatar #81 - deathnite (09/21/2013) [-]
It doesn't mather if someone has a gun its, its how it is being used. those guys would never fire a shot unless the president is in danger. Don't get me wrong, it would be nice if ti would not have been necessary. but overall guns are harmless, its the person carrying it who makes the difference between being harmless for us or not. so it's the people that are at fault.
#67 - gjah (09/21/2013) [-]
Difference between my country in Europe (Slovenia) and America:
Gun owner gets crazy in Slovenia and shoots his wife in front of kindergarden....
Gun owner gets crazy in America and shoots up whole kindergarden and then his wife...
It's not about guns, it's about people
#63 - taxideataxus (09/21/2013) [+] (1 reply)
This is 100% not applicable to the city of Chigaco, Illinois.
So stop.
#57 - nehger **User deleted account** (09/21/2013) [-]
Yes, keep oversimplifying things to make your point
It makes you look reaaallly clever
User avatar #45 - demandsgayversion (09/21/2013) [-]
There's a perfectly reasonable argument to be made for the positive of guns, but nobody ever makes them. It's always just oversimplified things like this. They're not wrong, they're just wrong.
#42 - twatfacejenkins (09/21/2013) [-]
if guns weren't legal the security guards wouldn't need them
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)