This woman.. Yes, this is a repost. I like Morticia Addams. . What is normal for the spider I Morticia Addams l. Here come all the funnyjunk philosophers. Morticia Addams Addams Family
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (203)
[ 203 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#4 - bipolarprobe
Reply +168 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Here come all the funnyjunk philosophers.
User avatar #88 to #4 - basstard
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Normal does not exist.Everyone will project word 'normal' based upon they opinion and behaviour and since all of us on Earth are not 100% same,word 'normal' cannot be used.

Check mate.
User avatar #109 to #88 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
The word normal is used for us, most often, to describe common and there most certainly is a most common. Therefore we could say (just an arbitrary example) the normal Asian has slanted eyes, not all Asians do but since it is more common to have it than not to, it would be "normal".
User avatar #111 to #109 - basstard
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I'd rather use casual,but i can your point.
User avatar #136 to #4 - helidead
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
The amount of love I have for this picture of yours is yes.
#26 to #4 - Shadow Guardian
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I rather enjoy it.
#7 - adu
Reply +137 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Funny is an illusion. What is funny for the casual browser is a tired repost for the lurker.
#75 to #7 - hisnameisjake
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I hate people complaining about reposts, but that was actually pretty clever and funny, so I'll thumb you anyway
I hate people complaining about reposts, but that was actually pretty clever and funny, so I'll thumb you anyway
User avatar #27 to #7 - tkuja
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
they will all fight you, irl
User avatar #87 to #27 - animedudej
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
and most likely "wrek u"
#18 - seiga
-25 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#20 to #18 - anon id: bd37f610
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I'm glad I asked.
#21 to #20 - seiga
-8 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#74 to #18 - berojin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Well don't you feel deep.
User avatar #139 to #18 - bloodflowers
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
All these big words make you sound like my coworker. He uses big fancy words that make him sound like he knows stuff and then he goes off about government brainwashing or his cat and lawyer are possessed by Satan or the elite upper class has a secret moon base. His name is Chris, we all hate Chris
User avatar #145 to #139 - kafudamapla
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
EVERYBODY HAAAAATES CHRIIIIS
#161 to #145 - seiga
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #166 to #161 - kafudamapla
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
And don't call me a "self-proclaimed hating bigot" because I corrected your definition of normal using ******* Google. I don't hate you, and I don't give a **** what you think about me. You're getting thumbed because your "philosophy" is just wrong, and you're coming across as verbose which is just annoying. If that's just genuinely how you speak then forgive me, but you are verbose and that will annoy people, so get used to it
#171 to #166 - seiga
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #174 to #171 - kafudamapla
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Alright you're clearly pretty wound up so I'm gonna try and be unoffensive. The definition of verbose is using more words than necessary to make a point. So by admitting you're verbose you're admitting that you use an unnecessary amount of words to make your point. Stopping that isn't dumbing yourself down, it's making your arguments clearer and your points easier to extract. I pride myself somewhat on my literacy and I found it difficult to read your comments.

I'm not saying you HAVE to change, and I'm not saying I'm better at writing than you. Just be wary that although intelligence is a virtue, verbosity is not

Sorry for the long comment
Yes I checked that verbosity was actually a word
#176 to #174 - seiga
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I see, I actually criticize myself for not being able to make myself concise and clear, and although sometimes people seem too simple in language to me now days, I see that it's purpose can be to be more clear. I'm known to not be clear in my conveyance, as I get misunderstood through the way I talk. A lot of people can't understand it. Something I'm trying to work on, but still figuring out. And yeah, I get wound up because I'm used to people misunderstanding me and giving me crap for it, when I don't (and I'm pretty sure everyone knows) think I did anything wrong. It's just that people judge me, when I'm the exact opposite. Maybe I did use too many glamorous words, I'll try to to change that.
I'm not arrogant, just analytical
User avatar #179 to #176 - kafudamapla
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
It appears we have come to a mutual satisfaction. Any hostility towards each other has been vanquished after an arduous discussion of opinions.
We cool *****
#182 to #179 - seiga
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Yes, that is my general endeavor with people, debate to raise each other's awareness and provide with understanding so there is less ignorance in society simultaneously making good relations, and less hatred.
My *****.
#165 to #161 - kafudamapla
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Jeez dude I was only referencing a show
#143 to #139 - kafudamapla
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#137 to #18 - notstill
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Being verbose doesn't make you intelligent
#140 to #137 - pkrbarmoviea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
But it doesn't make you unintelligent either.
#154 to #140 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
makes you look like an asshole
made him look like an asshole at least _ this is only here so I can do the face
#155 to #154 - pkrbarmoviea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Not at all; you mistake distance for hostility. Or maybe you simply did not understand some of the words and it made you feel less confident with yourself. You see? If you felt any hostility now, you are in the wrong. I just put forth an idea (and one that could be subject to someone's interest).

Come at me, bro.
#159 to #155 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I can't appreciate your comment enough. It's blinded confident-lacking people like them that makes me think of non-biased opinions such as mine. You see in his reply? He gets hostile again. Just because I'm "different", it's wrong. It's a self-fulfilling prophecy (that being that they don't want to accept a different opinion, something that may be higher in understanding than theirs, because they are scared, and want to be different than me, and in turn conform, becoming what they hate, so that they can pick on someone different.) I understand now. People mistake my "understanding" as arrogance, and in turn make me feel like crap, because I just post an opinion and not trying to be a try-hard. Just f*cking misunderstood as crap. Appreciate you are neutral though, and not inherently one-sided, as I wasn't trying to be one-sided myself.
#163 to #159 - pkrbarmoviea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Don't worry, funnyjunk is not the best place to debate these things. I absolutely see your point and hope that others would be more open to it (and I don't consider your writings to be verbose), but this simply is not the right place. Especially because the people here are mostly younger than us (I would assume in the range of 12 to 16), or just coming on this site to laugh and clear their heads. I noticed intellectual exhibitionism was quite discouraged on this site. It's a shame. I would be the first to admit that a pompous stance is disagreeable, but not when your only alternative is stupidity. Maybe it's just me and my lack of a decent sense of humor, but most of the content on this site is a little dumb.
#169 to #163 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Yeah, that makes me feel a little less discouraged. I didn't think that most people here are adolescents, but it's a true realization. It sucks that people bash intelligible responses because they choose not to listen, or feel bad about their own intelligence. But yes, I may have been a bit negative, and apologize for that, and probably should be more positive about general people, but I didn't think people would just be prejudice to my writing. Besides, I don't think what I wrote is "verbose" either, just a way I write. It's a shame intelligence is a rarity now days, and yeah, I liked the content here, but I realize now people just have dry humor in majority. It's like, people don't like when they hear the truth... *sigh* I'm not surprised though.
#177 to #169 - kafudamapla
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#156 to #155 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I don't know why you're angry now, when I said it "it makes you look like an asshole" I wasn't directing it towards yourself.    
None of those words he said are particularly difficult to understand. Whether or not you believe me doesn't really matter to me, anyone can just Google them and "prove" that they understand them but no one trusts each other so you'd just blame me for doing so.   
The definition of verbosity is using more words than needed. If he wanted to portray what he wanted to say he didn't have to use words to make him seem like 'vry smurt gui', granted anyone that thinks the government is out to get them or that society as a whole is crumbling is pretty stupid already.
I don't know why you're angry now, when I said it "it makes you look like an asshole" I wasn't directing it towards yourself.
None of those words he said are particularly difficult to understand. Whether or not you believe me doesn't really matter to me, anyone can just Google them and "prove" that they understand them but no one trusts each other so you'd just blame me for doing so.
The definition of verbosity is using more words than needed. If he wanted to portray what he wanted to say he didn't have to use words to make him seem like 'vry smurt gui', granted anyone that thinks the government is out to get them or that society as a whole is crumbling is pretty stupid already.
#173 to #156 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Also, just because the international language of the internet is to speak extremely simply, concisely (e.g. LOL, WTF, LMAO, Y U NO), unintellectually, and with cuss words every other sentence, doesn't mean you have the right to differentiate someone who speaks fine. I know that's how society is now days, but you're just confirming that society is getting stupider gradually by hating on something that even SEEMS intelligent.
#170 to #156 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I get your point, but everyone here including you are LARGELY misunderstanding that I even TRIED to sound "intelligent", that these big words are an invitation to think that I tried to sound smart. You know what is stupid though? That I probably won't get thumbs down for this and you will probably actually READ it just because it doesn't have big words in it. It's simple, and because it doesn't have big words, you don't assume I'm TRYING to sound smart. Again: I wasn't trying to sound smart just because I used big words. Please get that through your thick skulls. HURR DURR, HE USED BIG WERDS, LET'S BE SATIRICAL BECAUSE THAT CLEARLY MEANS HE'S SELF RIGHTEOUS. No. Just no.
#175 to #170 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I'm not too sure any of us are being satirical, we're being pretty forthcoming by calling you a faggot for trying to act cool. If you're going to use big words maybe you should know what some of them mean before ******** them out of your mouth.   
   
As you said, everyone here including me believes that you're trying to act smarter than you are by using big words. Since that's the case i'm pretty sure that makes you the one in the wrong. Since ur such a smrt gui you should know that old saying that one person out of every group of people is an idiot. If you can't find that person, I have bad news for you.
I'm not too sure any of us are being satirical, we're being pretty forthcoming by calling you a faggot for trying to act cool. If you're going to use big words maybe you should know what some of them mean before ******** them out of your mouth.

As you said, everyone here including me believes that you're trying to act smarter than you are by using big words. Since that's the case i'm pretty sure that makes you the one in the wrong. Since ur such a smrt gui you should know that old saying that one person out of every group of people is an idiot. If you can't find that person, I have bad news for you.
#180 to #175 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
P.S. Lmao, a funny junk community isn't going to convince me that I am the one lacking intelligence. I use big words, whilst you are probably a vegetable to think that big words don't require intelligence, while you have nothing intelligent whatsoever to contribute. Have you contributed contribute something comprehendable? IZ I 2 SMRT 4 U? LULZ, I R SO FUNY!~ Haha I mean really, FunnyJunk? You think you guys are intelligent when you're prepubescent faggots with no dicks laughing at useless crap on a borderline retarded website?
#178 to #175 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Yep, because everyone in class who believed Einstein was an idiot, including his teacher, as he failed him in Math, was right. You will never be right, or smart, because your stupidity exudes through your arrogance.

I'm not trying to act cool. My friend, because you're brain can't understand any of those words I used, does NOT mean I don't know what it means. LMAO. I know, that most people believe just because everyone agrees on it, it's right. I'm such a smrt gui, and realize I'm not going to yield to complete retardedness just because you said so.
#185 to #178 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I thought you were the one complaining that the internet was using stupid terms like LMAO yet you turn around and do the same thing.   
   
Look, I don't understand why you're so mad and why you're so hellbent on proving that you're actually not stupid to some guy on the internet you've never met, your use of big words just makes me think you're compensating for something else that's small. I don't particularly care what you think of me but I guess the same doesn't hold true in your case.   
   
I'm done arguing with you, I wouldn't really call this a conversation since the majority of your comments are just you being extremely butthurt. There was a positive thing I gained from it though, you boosted my ego from how idiotic you act.   
   
By the way you misused "you're" quite a few times, maybe you should worry more about the small words before trying to make yourself sound smarter with the big ones.   
   
Ja ne
I thought you were the one complaining that the internet was using stupid terms like LMAO yet you turn around and do the same thing.

Look, I don't understand why you're so mad and why you're so hellbent on proving that you're actually not stupid to some guy on the internet you've never met, your use of big words just makes me think you're compensating for something else that's small. I don't particularly care what you think of me but I guess the same doesn't hold true in your case.

I'm done arguing with you, I wouldn't really call this a conversation since the majority of your comments are just you being extremely butthurt. There was a positive thing I gained from it though, you boosted my ego from how idiotic you act.

By the way you misused "you're" quite a few times, maybe you should worry more about the small words before trying to make yourself sound smarter with the big ones.

Ja ne
#186 to #185 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
You're right I need not waste time on people like you. It made me mad that people gave me negativity, but I don't need to contribute to it. Glad I boosted your ego. Maybe you'll use it for helping someone else, instead of calling a random stranger a "faggot" next time and make others feel worthless.

I fight to lessen the world of people like you. One this ignorance will be wiped out.
#187 to #186 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
#188 to #187 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Shut up. Please don't suck me back into your f*ckery.
User avatar #189 to #188 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I don't know why you're censoring yourself, no one is going to run and tell your mommy
#190 to #189 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I don't know why you keep trolling, but I don't judge.
User avatar #191 to #190 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
If you contradict yourself any more you'll be hired by fox news, maybe you should look through your past comments before put words in your own mouth.
#192 to #191 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Hahaha you get pleasure out of this don't you? You get a KICK out of talking sh!t to a person you've never met. It's sad really. You feed on negativity like a parasite. A scavenger.
"I'm done arguing with you, I wouldn't really call this a conversation since the majority of your comments are just you being extremely butthurt."

Looks like there's only one way to make you shut up: make you feel like utter sh!t. Dumb ass, DUH I put words in my own mouth, I said them! Please, I don't want to talk to a potato anymore. But if you insist, reply to prove your sheer stupidity.
User avatar #193 to #192 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I would assume talking to a potato would be crazier than talking to a faggot.
#194 to #193 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Then you should lock yourself in an insane asylum, talking about yourself as a potato and a faggot.
User avatar #197 to #194 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
There you go misusing "you're" again and I thought you said you didn't judge people?
#199 to #197 - seiga
0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Can't even reply to my last comment? Are you scared sh!tless?
#198 to #197 - seiga
0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
There you go misusing "you're a faggot" for yourself. And you say you're not brainless?
User avatar #195 to #194 - notstill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Good one, I remember when I was nine years old.
#201 to #195 - seiga
0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
You're online and haven't replied. If you're too stupid to have to take time to think of a witty comment, hang yourself.
#196 to #195 - seiga
0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
When you were locked up in a loony bin? HAH, I was just trying to make you feel like sh!t, but you're degenerated lack of self worth is true! You admit how stupid and crazy you are when under pressure! It's really amusing to see you deteriorate you excuse for a human being.
#162 to #156 - pkrbarmoviea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I was just kidding. Sorry, I thought it was obvious.
#158 to #137 - seiga
-2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#167 to #158 - notstill
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
y u so mad doe?
y u so mad doe?
#172 to #167 - seiga
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #146 to #18 - studbeefpile
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
A nonconformist on the internet? How shocking.
User avatar #34 to #18 - kafudamapla
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
nor·mal
Adjective
Conforming to a standard; usual, typical, or expected.

No
#57 to #34 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I'm talking about what most people are, that there are a lot of ignorant and blinded, but that is considered normal now days. You may think babies born out of wedlock that is so rampant in society is normal for instance, like the majority of society, but I believe that is what's wrong with such "normal".
It's also funny how no one gets something that's actually creatively and intuitively sensical, and instead I get red thumbs. And yet no one has anything intelligent to respond. People here are...wow, just wow.
User avatar #77 to #57 - benjamino
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Maybe if you didn't sound like a self-important prat people would be more inclined to debate philosophy.
#106 to #77 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
And just because I sound intelligent, people are hating on me. It's sad that people are trying to dilute me into their abysmal dumb. And everything satirical and sarcastic and stupid are thumbed up. Go ahead, thumb me down.
User avatar #113 to #106 - benjamino
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
You'll find I've given you no thumbs, one way or the other. Stop sounding like you've used a thesaurus on every word. Believe me, it doesn't make you seem distinguished, it makes you sound like an asshat. Using big words to make a point doesn't make the point any more true or false.
In fact, you'll often find that the best philosophy, the most poignant and striking quotes, are the ones that take up a line or less.
What is offending people is how self-important your quotes are. I can see the point your making, and although I stand firm in the belief that as a race we constantly progress, and although it often seems the norm is boring and all is conformed, you only have to step outside to see that we live in a world of such variety that you couldn't possibly say we conform to anything, I can also see you raise valid points.
But people will listen to the person who says 'Hey guys, what do you think of this' rather than the one who stands next to him shouting 'Inferior beings, here my wisdom, accept it as truth for I am intelligent sounding'.
Take this as constructive criticism, I'm not trying to be mean.
#157 to #113 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
You're not mean? Yet you call me a f*cking asshat? I DO NOT think humans are inferior to me in any way, but f*cking IDIOTS like all of you here on FunnyJunk assume it JUST because you're biased against someone who uses big words. You THINK I'm condescending towards you people, and yet you don't even CONSIDER the content I wrote! Are you stupid!??! Yes, everyone pick on the guy who said something with big words! I don't see any other reason to hate on my post! What I said isn't even OFFENSIVE, it's an objective opinion of people, but f*cking vegetating IDIOTS like most of these people here are COOL HIPSTERS who are against someone who uses big words! Because I was TRYING to show off my vocabulary, right? I don't even HAVE A GOOD VOCABULARY! I KNOW THAT! And if you want a simpler approach for your f*cking stupid worthless minds, here it is: Humans are in majority blinded, but there are a lot who are very enlightened and good. And I wasn't talking about FunnyJunk posters, cuz I like a lot of the content here, but after this post, I know that ALL OF you are f*cking mindless, brainwashed, idiots. Yes that's right, pick on the guy cuz everyone hates him. Well f*ck you, because I'm sure anyone who has the negativity to say all this negative crap to someone for a worthwhile opinion has no self worth. And I know you're gonna repeat the same bull to me, telling me my argument is worthless. I know your kind, and people like most of you are the reason I make these comments, all of you have confirmed my loss of faith in humanity. Just because someone is able to make their sentences LOOK good, doesn't mean it's truth! Just because my content LOOKED like crap as it was coated with BIG WORDS (OOOH, SO EGOTISTICAL), and I'm not able to formulate my thoughts well outwardly, DOESN'T MEAN IT'S UNTRUE AND STUPID.
User avatar #164 to #157 - benjamino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
And for that, I'm assuming you're a troll. Good day to you sir.
User avatar #181 to #164 - kafudamapla
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Think we just helped create a new copypasta
User avatar #183 to #181 - benjamino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I think you could well be right.
#200 to #183 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
I think you may be a faggot for saying "well be right".
User avatar #202 to #200 - benjamino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
gg, 6/10.
Really had me going. Got plenty of serious replies. Well done honestly.
#203 to #202 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Perhaps you're too mindless to realize I was serious.
User avatar #204 to #203 - benjamino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/21/2013) [-]
Perhaps.
#141 to #106 - kafudamapla
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#105 to #77 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Aren't you a basket of flowers? All I said was my opinion about society, it doesn't mean I dislike EVERYONE, just that there are a lot of self centered humans now days. I've seen myriad similar comments on how human civilization deserves to get downright WIPED OUT, and praised for it, yet you call me a prat for saying something that's much more theoretical? I'm getting the feeling I'm getting these thumbs because people are offended against people who sound intelligent, because that equates to being a "prat".
User avatar #23 to #18 - benjamino
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I'm glad I asked
#160 to #23 - seiga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Do I sound like I'm imposing or something? Or I'm saying something offensive? Tell me, what did I write wrong in a post that is about a philosophy of someone who is discussing the definition of normal?
#24 to #23 - seiga
-9 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#135 to #24 - nickypickle
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
in all honesty though, no one really gives a ****
#39 - goodnewseveryone
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
some deep stuff
User avatar #40 to #39 - stely
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Could someone make this 1900x1080? Pretty please?
User avatar #45 to #39 - skeptical
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
You know, when you add in the double negatives, this is actually a pretty inspirational jpg. 8/10.
#56 to #39 - cdsams
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Sloths man
Sloths man
#104 - kokaines
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#148 to #104 - betaguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#123 to #104 - bitchpleaseshutup
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#127 to #123 - fournum
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Took me way too long to see that!
#55 - dathunter
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
"Power is an illusion. Absolute power is a seamless illusion."
User avatar #91 to #55 - bonlino
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
animalfarm.book
#64 to #55 - weeballoonz **User deleted account**
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
That was a ******* horrible boss after you fight him 7 times,and he says that line every time i just want to get done with him But the saying is good anyway
#66 to #64 - dathunter
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Lol, i agree, but i think the game was trying to be based mostly on fighting other people than killing a boss,
>"How can this happen? None have beaten me untill now!"
>Killed him 4 times already
>le may may arrows
#78 to #66 - warioteam
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#138 to #64 - exlo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
That's a boss? Can you please inform me of what game that is? Because you know. RPGs. Especially if it's a JRPG. Because you know. JRPGs. (Hopefully this is an RPG we're talking about, because when I hear "boss" that's just what I think of.)
That's a boss? Can you please inform me of what game that is? Because you know. RPGs. Especially if it's a JRPG. Because you know. JRPGs. (Hopefully this is an RPG we're talking about, because when I hear "boss" that's just what I think of.)
User avatar #149 to #138 - dathunter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
It's not really considered an RPG, it's a game like Smash Bros, but it's for the PS3, there are levels to the certain characters you play as, and it unlocks you stuff themed from that character, like icons and backgrounds in-game
#150 to #149 - exlo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
Oh. That Playstation All-stars game? Wait was that actually good? I didn't get that simply because of the fact that it pretty much appeared to be a crappy Smash Bros. And also Game Grumps.
#184 to #150 - dathunter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
It's a good game, but too many people keep comparing it to Smash Bros,and assuming it is **** because of that,. It has it's similarities, but it is somewhat different, but it is a good game IMO
User avatar #119 to #64 - sagedivinity
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I consider this a role playing game, you'll be playing the part of the piñata.
#50 - ompalomper
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
chaos is an illusion, what is chaos for a daemon is heresy for an inquisitor

that was horrible _ ill go to the stupid-corner now
User avatar #84 to #50 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
You are an illusion. What is me for you is you for me.
#85 to #84 - ompalomper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
indeed
User avatar #86 to #85 - spainisbad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
That image is just an illusion. What was real life fo the photographer and the guy are pixels for us.
#89 to #50 - animedudej
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#60 to #50 - grapefruity
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#103 - kokaines
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#107 to #103 - deltaxomega
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#126 to #107 - lucianolp
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Red Luigi worst Luigi.
User avatar #48 - latinotornado
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Yea sure since you're comparing two different ******* species. But how dumb does it sound when you say "what's normal for the bumble bee is chaos for another bumble bee" Illusion my ass
#69 to #48 - unbelievable
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
#49 to #48 - iveseensomethings
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
What makes sense to you, doesn't make sense to me. Like your post.
#53 to #48 - cdsams
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
The quote was saying that eating flies are normal to a spider but it is murder to a fly at the most simplest level of understanding.
User avatar #58 to #53 - latinotornado
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
That was my point. I'm saying this quote isn't really deep and it's irritating me how people repost this damn picture all the time. Her claim was "normality is an illusion." and is supposed to relate to people, humans. Normality is not an illusion, it is subjective. Humans are not spiders and flys. We're all just humans. So the comparison of two different species is stupid to me. This also covers my 'illusion my ass' statement. I will admit, I was a little to angry posting that comment but I stand by it regardless
User avatar #59 to #58 - cdsams
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
You don't realize the idea was the relationship between the fly and the spider and not the species? You are focusing too much on frivolous inconsistent details and not on the constants of the idea.
User avatar #61 to #59 - latinotornado
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
The idea is bogus BECAUSE of the details. Normality is just not an illusion, it's not. Normality exists. And it is subjective.
User avatar #68 to #61 - sirwolfcat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Actually normality is more relative than subjective. What I mainly get from this is that what is normal may not be normal to someone else or even what actually is normal, and normality, in a more general sense, can not be dictated purely by human standards. This can also apply to societies and social classes, religious and secular beliefs.
#65 to #61 - cdsams
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
I thumb you up for your thought. I stop arguing because their is an intense amount of philosophy and time required for someone to understand the idea of non numerical constants and variables in the physical and theoretical world. I give you a nuclear waffle.
I thumb you up for your thought. I stop arguing because their is an intense amount of philosophy and time required for someone to understand the idea of non numerical constants and variables in the physical and theoretical world. I give you a nuclear waffle.
#67 to #65 - latinotornado
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Thanks buddy. And i'll give you..well..okay i'm not really sure what this is but it's yours!
Thanks buddy. And i'll give you..well..okay i'm not really sure what this is but it's yours!
#1 - zaiopeperse
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Holy **** I love those films :3
Holy **** I love those films :3
#2 to #1 - dafuckisthisshit
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#3 to #2 - hiimevildarkness [OP]
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Look at her.... In her whole beauty..
#11 to #3 - suckittrebek
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Yeah.. Just look at her!
#72 to #11 - anon id: 2713b798
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Oh, you took one bad photo from wherever to prove your opinion of someone's beauty? Wow.
User avatar #117 to #72 - suckittrebek
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
First of all.. *I* didn't take thee pho. I posted it..
Second.. Just google "Anjelica Huston"..
Either you'll find her in her slim days (Addams Family), or the fat days (mildly imitating Jabba the Hutt)..
#5 to #3 - anon id: c68f8241
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
beauty? Hey face is so long a plane could land on it.
#153 to #5 - bipolarprobe
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/20/2013) [-]
You done good, anon, you done good.
#15 to #5 - anon id: 595faed3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
Yes, because you make the rules to what is beautiful and what isn't. Oh, wait, no, it's subjective. Beauty is subjective. So, yeah, she may not be perfect, but she is beautiful.
User avatar #19 to #15 - lawander **User deleted account**
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
subjection is subjective you undeducated neaderthal
User avatar #6 to #5 - kevinator
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
ahahahahaha!
User avatar #25 to #5 - uhidk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(09/19/2013) [-]
and?