Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - jaysnk
Reply -8
(09/11/2013) [-]
Its called vandalism
#59 to #1 - daentraya
Reply 0
(09/12/2013) [-]
People are butthurt over the fact that said artist should have gotten permission before painting that. It's pretty indeed, but vandalism it is
#2 to #1 - jaevel
Reply +83
(09/11/2013) [-]
Yes, I agree on you that painting over such a great artwork is vandalisem
#47 to #2 - newant
Reply 0
(09/12/2013) [-]
Moreover, I wish societies had more of these kind of graphitti artists.
I want to look at cool pictures of stuff while going to work, school, etc.
#3 to #2 - brokentrucker
Reply +11
(09/11/2013) [-]
Just because its great work, doesn't make it right to just paint on walls. If you acquire permission, THEN the owners are cunts for painting over it. Without permission, its just vandalism. I don't like the laws anymore than the last man, but to seriously expect anything else is foolishness.
#12 to #3 - bowties
Reply +14
(09/11/2013) [-]
#50 to #12 - savethepandas
Reply -1
(09/12/2013) [-]
How come you don't have more thumbs?

Not in a mutant kind of way.
#8 to #3 - createdjustnow
Reply -2
(09/11/2013) [-]
if you look, how long do you think it would take to piant that? all that effort had to require someone's knoweledge of it being done, and therefore a sort of permission. If the owner didn't want the art up there, should have asked the author to stop before the author finished
#39 to #8 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account**
Reply +1
(09/12/2013) [-]
If the owner wanted it there it wouldn't have been painted over.

No matter how good looking some graffiti are, painting someone's property without permission is comparable to going into someone's FB account and changing their status to whatever they wanted.

And if they wanted to change it back to normal it would cost 25$ and a few hours, or 100$ an hour to pay someone else to do it.
#73 to #39 - anon
Reply 0
(09/12/2013) [-]
If the owner had the lease to that property, and operated their business from there - like say a skateshop or a tattoo parlour - then that art would have been done by the owner, and done in a way to attract attention and a certain type of customer.

My guess is the business is no longer there, and the real estate company that acts as the vendor decided to paint over that "ugly" artwork to try and attract new business.
#4 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(09/11/2013) [-]
yeah like they would ever get permission to paint sexy alice up there, dumbass
#9 to #4 - brokentrucker
Reply +3
(09/11/2013) [-]
You would be surprised sir.