Mah nigga colbert up in dis bitch. . HIE ' I' EII Swamis MS Ito [} E MIT h' SYRIA BEMUSE Barret' rott MSM IS o, HIS [Will cumin. okay... i want to clear a few things up here (and i am on neither side). it isn't just the USA who wants to attack Syria. it is against the geniva convention to
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Mah nigga colbert up in dis bitch

+1128
Views: 52225
Favorited: 146
Submitted: 09/07/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to isexhorses E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(230):

[ 230 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - actinglead (09/07/2013) [+] (33 replies)
okay... i want to clear a few things up here (and i am on neither side).
it isn't just the USA who wants to attack Syria.
it is against the geniva convention to use chemical whepons (so the un kinda wants to find out if its true or not then go to war)
this is not about going to war. it is about saving thousands and thousands of lives.
but
war will cost the world a lot of money
we just got out of one unnecessary war.
and people need to realize how little power the president has. he cannot officially declare war...
#49 - wizardbaker (09/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"Stop trying to be the world police, America!"

"America, what the **** ? Why didn't you try stopping Syria sooner?"

What do you people want?!
#24 - golbot (09/07/2013) [+] (22 replies)
We have a history of watching bad things happen to people and not acting.

In the 1990s when Serbians were killing Bosnians we said "let Europe handle Europe" and as a result 200,000 people died before we helped.

In ww2 when we had intel that Germans were killing Jews, we waited to get attacked before doing anything. meanwhile 6 million died.

Rawanda we said "let the UN handle it" and 800,000 dead civilians later, nothing has been done.

So when people say "let someone else handle Syria" I say "look what happens when we stand by and let the world 'handle' genocide"

You can all have your own opinions on whether or not we should go to Syria but dont pretend its not our problem and that the world will fix it if we dont.
#8 - kingpongthedon (09/07/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Yeah, the thing about chemical warfare is that it's indiscriminate. When those 1400 people were killed, they weren't necessarily willing combatants, 426 were children. When two sides meet on a battlefield, it's assumed that they're there on their own free will. They know the risk and they've accepted it. The problem isn't that 1400 people died, it's that many of them were civilians. It's the same thing with gang violence. It's tragic when anybody dies, but for the most part, the people involved knew the risk associated with that lifestyle and they lost out. It's not until an innocent bystander gets caught in a drive-by that anybody cares.

TLDR: It's not the killing that's the problem, it's who's being killed.
#40 - miltorky (09/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
everyone's being an armchair politician and I'm just sitting here masturbating,
pic unrelated
#97 - beisenherg (09/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #148 - PVTDickStryker (09/07/2013) [+] (6 replies)
The US doesnt give a free-flying **** about the citizens, what it DOES care about is the possibility of having those chemical weapons used against it. The government is just using the "we have to save the people!" rant as an excuse to not have the bleeding heart liberals start being buttfrustrated.
User avatar #44 - navadae (09/07/2013) [-]
i`m not really sure why.. but political crap on FJ just annoys me, not the people or anything (and i`m not doing any mass downthumbing or whatnot) it's just... "oh hey i go here to get away from some of this crap" and then BITCHSLAP OF POLITICS

...that is all
#10 - bitchplzzz (09/07/2013) [-]
well to be honest, it IS a warcrime to use chemicals... but I see the point




War is stupid.
#77 - ronyx (09/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
LoL, if the US doesn't launch any offensive against Syria, then all the other dicators in the world who already don't give a **** about their people, but don't risk using methods like chemical weapons because the US might get involved will know that the UN can't do **** and the US won't do **** either. So they'll go ahead and do whatever they want. Then if the US doesn't attack Syria, Israel will go ahead and doit. Since Syria already sank a submarine from Israel and it is possible that the tactical nuke used on Syria was from Israel. Of course if Israel attacks Syria, Turkey will get involved since they want a piece of the land. If Turkey gets involved, Russia will cross Georgia and attack Turkey to protect Russia's interests. Funny how everyone claims "hurr durr the US wants to attack Syria for their own interests" but in reality no action through the UN could be taken because Russia has a lot of interests in Syria, hell they even got a base there and for those who don't know, Russia can veto any action through the UN against Syria. So for those that cry, "omg let's doit through the UN or don't do anything" are plain uninformed, because Putin sucks Assad's cock and vise versa.
User avatar #100 - willindor (09/07/2013) [+] (2 replies)
OP why are you downthumbing every comment? If you don't want people to comment then disable it.
#102 to #101 - willindor (09/07/2013) [-]
You clever bastard.
User avatar #87 - iwaspromisedcake (09/07/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I really don't want to get involved in this but I'm pretty sure Obama wants the international community to attack Syria as retribution for using chemical weapons which are banned by international law
#83 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/07/2013) [-]
it's more of a spanking than a war. it's like "NO. NO SYRIA YOU DON'T DO THAT." we want to send a message here. that we don't tolerate chemical warfare. a lot of other countries are of the same mindset but Russia's throwing up interference. they don't want anybody sticking their noses in Syria, because it's their last satellite representative of themselves. which has both economic, political, and i'm guessing nationalistic power for them.
#39 - sirbutterballs (09/07/2013) [+] (13 replies)
I think America would benefit from an actual war on gangs. Like sending in the army to deal these rat-bastards. As long as they didn't use bombs n' **** . maybe tanks
#1 - xxxsonic fanxxx (09/07/2013) [+] (5 replies)
America hasn't put forward any proof yet about who used the chemical weapons.

That needs to be found out before anyone gets ******* bombed.

Think about it. America couldn't reasonably intervene until war crimes took place. Why in the honest hell would Syria give America an excuse?
#170 - wadawada (09/07/2013) [-]
I dont want to be a killjoy and neither am I against US amry invasions, but there is like a little statement in the Geneva consomething about using chemical warfare.
User avatar #56 - heartlessrobot (09/07/2013) [+] (8 replies)
Yet no one did anything when riot police gassed protesters IN america.
Yes, tear gas is technically a chemical weapon.
User avatar #78 to #73 - ronyx (09/07/2013) [-]
An accidental kill is not the same as killing a thousand people in one clean swoop.
#31 - SILENCEnight (09/07/2013) [-]
**SILENCEnight rolled a random image posted in comment #3 at Horse dick ** Hue
[ 230 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)