RRRrrrriiiiiiiiiiggggggghhhhhhhtttttttt!. .. The real question is why are they throwing one dollar bills? thats y i dont buy their Garbage
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - mcshwagger (09/03/2013) [+] (6 replies)
The real question is why are they throwing one dollar bills?
User avatar #11 - yourinvisiblegf (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i don't see any artist in this picture
#7 - missing has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#14 - notgabenewell (09/03/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Finally, I can use this.
#6 - mordakai ONLINE (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#10 - spacemasterfive (09/03/2013) [+] (2 replies)
cheap bastard is throwin singles
User avatar #38 - trickroller (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
The real question is, how much do I have to pirate to kill the 'artist'?
User avatar #44 - kristovsky (09/03/2013) [-]
Piracy hurts artists.

Musicians don't give a **** .
User avatar #9 - tonyxx (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Because of digital downloads adn streaming, artist get 6% or their income from selling the music itself, the rest of it comes from mostly merchandising and a bit of touring (compared to 70% in 1990)
User avatar #3 - slothmaster (09/03/2013) [+] (3 replies)
the bottom picture makes it look like the guy in the top-left picture is wearing stockings...
User avatar #73 - Pestilence (09/04/2013) [-]
This is just ignorant. Whenever people talk about piracy hurting the artist, they're talking about the ones that aren't rich from making a hit single or from the herd of sheep that follow them. This is most common in the metal scene. I buy every CD that I come across from bands that I enjoy, because I know that they're (most likely) spending every last cent they have just to be able to tour and get their name out there. It's the last thing we as the fans can do for the bands we enjoy.
#37 - fuckyosixtyminutes (09/03/2013) [+] (13 replies)
"If you're rich, you're less entitled to the protection of your intellectual property rights!"

- Funnyjunk
User avatar #34 - psydoc (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I neither buy nor download music, in fact, I hardly listen to music at all so I think i'm fairly impartial in the sense that I don't benefit either way. My opinion is that the music industry failed to embrace new technology when it came along. I think they thought they could make more money by fighting against technological advancement than by embracing it. So I have little compassion for them and their "problems". I don't think it's any harder to make money from your music now than it was in the past, nor do I think the industry is suffering. If they are, then I think they can blame themselves.

Plus the music industry has crappy morals (see Miley Cyrus) so I have little compassion for them crying "foul". Also they have deep pockets, so you can bet that they've been able to slant the laws in their favor.
User avatar #58 to #34 - haidoss (09/04/2013) [-]
"See Miley Cyrus " oh man, I cant stop laughing
#1 - anonymous (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Is this... is this meant to be read right to left like a manga?... wtf op this isn't ******* manga
User avatar #5 to #1 - caseh ONLINE (09/03/2013) [-]
I was reading manga the second before I came onto this post and I read it right to left so I didn't notice it until you pointed it out
#77 - rodrickbane (09/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
What if all that is just drug money? and the "artists" are using their 			******		 CDs as a cover up to launder it all..? Am I watching too much Breaking Bad?  (gif not related)
What if all that is just drug money? and the "artists" are using their ****** CDs as a cover up to launder it all..? Am I watching too much Breaking Bad? (gif not related)
#55 - gtfomylawnbish (09/04/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Am I the only one noticing those are a bunch of $1.00 bills? Those are musicians, they're black people around April and that's earned income credit tax there. Not to be "that guy" , but that's called being " ****** rich" That huge stack of bills? It's 1.00 bills x 35 stacks. That's 3500.00.
User avatar #52 - Fgner (09/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Huge music producers like this douche nugget I have no sympathy for. However, indie musicians like Ninja Sex Party (they're awesome) do get hurt by piracy. They have a small fanbase, so every single purchase counts.
#27 - notafunnyguy (09/03/2013) [+] (1 reply)
art shouldbt be made for money. if its made for money, its made for all the wrong reasons. sharing songs should be intended to be free, how else would anyone discover new artists? im not gonna buy a song ive never heard from an artist i dont know. all the money in the music industry is from performing shows and the such. the actual sharing of their art shouldnt cost the viewer money, only the performances.
User avatar #17 - tomowrath (09/03/2013) [+] (11 replies)
If I was having potential thousands to millions stolen from me, I would definately be pissed.


Yes it is, since if u pirate the song, the chances of you buying it one day are slim to none
User avatar #39 to #17 - mycatislookingatme (09/03/2013) [-]
Even Lady GaGa said she doesn't need the money, she has more money than you can shake a stick at.
#18 - vinigger (09/03/2013) [-]
They're going to need that money when they're 40 years old and broke
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)