Picard on Syrian War. What... is there just more STUPID to go around these days? Found on my feed and cleaned up a bit.. PET ME GET THIS STRAIGHT... WE' RE milt picard syria War
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #156 - traveltech (09/02/2013) [+] (50 replies)
It's because chemical weapons were used, which are terrible. There's an international ban on their use and if it doesn't get enforced then other regimes won't be afraid to use them. Obama is jumping the gun, however. We do know for a fact that chemical weapons were used, but we don't know who used them yet.
User avatar #11 - KayRed (09/01/2013) [+] (11 replies)
Only stupid people simplify situations like this to make themselves look clever.
#9 - chudboy has deleted their comment [+] (14 replies)
#17 to #9 - jakelguy (09/01/2013) [-]
most chemical weapons act much like torture as you die. the missile strikes are only aimed at military targets. Chemical weapons are outlawed under the geneva conventions. Granted, I do not think America should act alone on this. I think we should have a multilateral effort with the blessing of the UN. pic not relevant.
#133 - chubbisavior (09/01/2013) [+] (1 reply)
I'm certainly not
User avatar #79 - warburg (09/01/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Don't be purposefully thickheaded, there's this thing called chemical weapons, the Geneva Convention and human rights. Now I know the US and the west aren't exactly consistent when it comes to these things, but we can do what's right in Syria or what's easy. I'll let you figure out which is which.
#111 - cmndrfatty (09/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Is this true that Russia is threatening us if we invade Syria? I just wanna clear up some rumors :I
User avatar #115 to #111 - vindictivenature (09/01/2013) [-]
No, but it'd upset them greatly.
User avatar #124 - salihzzz ONLINE (09/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
I honestly don't believe Asad used chemical weapens, he just started to get the upper hand, the war wouldn't have lasted more than a year.

And i feel like the us is being a little bitch. first they sponsor the freedom fighters and when **** goes downhill they want to invade, no illuminati **** but if you can't see there's a hidden agenda, you're an idiot.
And to every one talking about the geneva convention and international laws, the US and Israel have broken a few of those laws aswell...

now we sit back and watch the red thumbs pile up
#90 - lolfire (09/01/2013) [+] (14 replies)
America. Stay the **** out of Syria.

We're not even backing you up any more. And us and France were basically the only ones up for it.
User avatar #132 to #131 - lolfire (09/01/2013) [-]
Meh, it's a conversation starter.
#194 - mojobringer (09/02/2013) [+] (3 replies)
User avatar #200 to #194 - vatra (09/02/2013) [-]
The UN*..
#164 - twofreegerbils (09/02/2013) [+] (6 replies)
>there are weapons of mass destruction in Iraq!
>can you confirm this?
>lets wreck their **** anyways!!

>there are chemical weapons being used in Syria!
>can you confirm this?
>no.... No actual confirmation has been provided for the use of chemical weapons being used by the SAA. The supposed strike took place when the UN weapons inspectors were in the country, which would have been the most unlikely time for the SAA to approve a chemical weapon attack. It doesn't add up.
>lets wreck their **** anyways!!

Yes goy, good goy, it's definitely not about oil at all.
User avatar #168 to #164 - ainteasybeincheesy (09/02/2013) [-]
In all honesty we get virtually no oil from Syria... Just thought I'd let you know.
#213 - fantomen (09/02/2013) [+] (4 replies)
>Saddam uses nerve gas against his own citizens
>America ends up invading, twice

>Assad (and possibly the FSA) Use nerve gas against each other
>America says they're going to invade

******* STOP!
I'm not one of those faggots that hate the US, but this has nothing to do with the US! Obama needs to stop playing world police. He needs to focus on the economy and unemployment like he promised, not becoming G.W. Bush 2 , passing his own patriot act (NDAA) and invading his own middle eastern ******** in search of WMDs.
#145 - yodaddysofat ONLINE (09/02/2013) [+] (1 reply)
ahhh now THIS guy is gonna get all jealous
#96 - malifauxdeux (09/01/2013) [+] (8 replies)
No, we're attacking Syria because the Syrian government, which has almost no support from its own people, is killing them with nerve gas. Like, I seriously don't understand how people can remain so ******* ignorant to what's going on yet constantly talk about it. Like, have you even bothered to look anything up or think about anything yourself? Because it seems like just another big internet circle jerk based on a knee jerk reaction caused by lack of information and the inability to change your mind about anything.
User avatar #106 to #104 - thatoneiranianguy ONLINE (09/01/2013) [-]
Or besides the fact most of the FSA isn't even Syrian, most are foreign Wahhabists funded by Saudi Arabia and the United States. Why else do you think NATO Weaponry is ending up in their hands?

Doesn't it worry you many of the rebels have connections to Al-Qaeda? Doesn't it worry you that we're support ultra-fundamentalist Islamists? Do some research. Watch some more videos. These people have mutilated civilians. Public executions and beheadings. Assad isn't a great guy either but I'd rather have a secularist dictator in power than a bunch of Islamic Neofascists.

Also, I highly doubt Assad used chemical weapons. Putin was right in saying there would be no reason for Assad to use chemical weapons knowingly to gain international attention when he's winning his war. More than likely it was the rebels that used chemical weapons supplied by Wahhabis in Saudi Arabia.
#193 - graknab (09/02/2013) [-]
**** this anti-anti-syria bandwagon. I'm not saying that a government that authorized the use of NERVE GAS on it's citizens needs to necessarily be bombed, but supporting them isn't the way to solve this issue
#182 - lloydminster (09/02/2013) [+] (2 replies)
"Hey lets send as much young men with families to go fight a war that is not our own." --America
#140 - Absolute Madman (09/02/2013) [+] (1 reply)
"The economy of Syria is based on agriculture, oil, industry and services..."
User avatar #144 to #140 - richardastley (09/02/2013) [-]
Lots of countries have an economy based (at least partially) on oil. And yes, while doing business with those countries helps their economies, America benefits from it too because that's how doing business works. Iraq isn't doing well because the people don't get along, not because there isn't any money around.
#123 - asheskirata (09/01/2013) [-]
**asheskirata rolled a random image posted in comment #5744733 at Admin's personal trolling board. **

welcome to how the United States works.
User avatar #39 - aeric (09/01/2013) [+] (15 replies)
No because Syria is slaughtering their own people.
#47 to #41 - fixxxer (09/01/2013) [-]
"in the United States" Why does a policy in the US mean that they can police everyone else?

#5 - Absolute Madman (09/01/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Don't be retarded, we're MAY use missle attacks or drone strikes on Syria akin to Libya because they gassed ******* children. I get that this is a complicated, difficult situation with no easy answer but it seems this entire website are conspiracy theorists who think the Illuminati want to extract oil from Assad's dick.
User avatar #12 to #5 - KayRed (09/01/2013) [-]
Anon laying down the truth. Good for you man.
User avatar #21 - TARDIS (09/01/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Syria used chemical weapons, the only thing that has been preventing the use of such weapons is the threat of U.S. involvement if they do.

Syria used these weapons because they think they can get away with it, that we won't get involved. If we prove them right, they'll use them again. And not just them, but everyone else that has been holding back.

If we do nothing we risk letting middle east erupt, we risk letting thousands die, thousands who's only crime was where they lived.

This is why presidents age so quickly.
User avatar #57 to #49 - TARDIS (09/01/2013) [-]
I just can't accept that we have to let people die because of politics. I wonder if the best thing we could do is call in China, see if they could do something.

Which is worse, doing something and watching it blowup in your face, or do nothing and always wonder if you could have made a difference, if you could have saved someone.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)