Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #10 - omninickk (09/01/2013) [-]
Then they just do tests on her and find your DNA traces inside her ****** and around the area. Also, where did the 'rapist' go? Don't you think she would expect him to be there as you undid the blindfold?
#12 to #10 - commonlyrare (09/01/2013) [-]
"kicked the rapists ass" she wouldve assumed the rapist ran away or something
User avatar #13 to #12 - omninickk (09/01/2013) [-]
Yeah, fair point. But still, DNA traces, man.
User avatar #27 to #13 - Pryda (09/01/2013) [-]
For a dna test to work they would need someone elses dna to compare it ..
#14 to #13 - commonlyrare (09/01/2013) [-]
dont DNA traces still cost a lot, too much for only a rape? not sure though
User avatar #22 to #14 - animalsgreenberet (09/01/2013) [-]
too much for a rape? uh, that's kinda ****** up dude. rape is a serious thing.
#23 to #22 - commonlyrare (09/01/2013) [-]
yeah, i know, but imagine if they had to pay for DNA traces for every rape victim in detroit? how would that work out?
User avatar #16 to #14 - omninickk (09/01/2013) [-]
You would think that, having been sexually assaulted, you shouldn't have to pay for it. It's like a service that logically SHOULD be provided by the government, just like contraception and abortion services when acceptable. It might cost, but a rape victim shouldn't have to pay for it. If they want to catch a rapist, they have to put money in.
#17 to #16 - commonlyrare (09/01/2013) [-]
i didnt mean the victim should pay, but that the government wouldnt pay for an expensive procedure like that for a common (depending on place) crime
User avatar #20 to #17 - omninickk (09/01/2013) [-]
I don't know how much it costs. However, rape isn't REALLY that common, but I guess I don't have enough knowledge on it to really go into the subject and defend my point. It was only just common sense.
#21 to #20 - commonlyrare (09/01/2013) [-]
point taken. i dont have much knowledge on the topic either and was just giving logical counter argument
User avatar #29 to #21 - cheatmasterjunk (09/02/2013) [-]
That's a very level-headed discussion you're having, but wouldn't you expect the DNA of a woman's husband to be on her ****** anyway?
User avatar #34 to #29 - omninickk (09/02/2013) [-]
But the rape happened BEFORE they were in a relationship and got married.
User avatar #35 to #34 - cheatmasterjunk (09/02/2013) [-]
Since the story ended with them being married I was assuming the discussion started at that point in time, presumably some months later.
User avatar #36 to #35 - omninickk (09/03/2013) [-]
The way I am looking at it is this:

Rape > DNA Test > Relationship > Marriage
#33 to #29 - commonlyrare (09/02/2013) [-]
They only became husband and wife long after the rape. The DNA trace wouldve been done right after, i would expect, so before they even had sex again
 Friends (0)