Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Anonymous commenting is allowed
-22
#103 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
#286 to #103 - teranin ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
Look I've got nothing against a public display of affection, regardless of who is being affectionate with whom, but there is a limit and there are laws of public decency for a reason. Assless chaps, a leash, and making out in a retail store is going a bit too far.

When you are an employee at that location, ignoring them is not an option, because customer complaints could be filed due to their actions. I don't like the ******* way this "confession bear" crap plays out, because it seems to be directing at one subgroup of people and not at the overall concept of public tip-toeing on the line of indescent exposure, so I see where you're coming from but just can't agree.

Sorry leal.
-1
#296 to #286 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
#301 to #296 - teranin ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
HA! you know what, I totally just assumed that from the "fully clad in leather" part.
HA! you know what, I totally just assumed that from the "fully clad in leather" part.
-1
#303 to #301 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
#304 to #303 - teranin ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
It seemed like the implication was that it was ******* , but OP could be a total prude. Tell you what, if OP meant it was revealing leather that was ******* , I stand by what I said, but if OP just meant like... leather jacket and pants that were reasonable and stuff, then yeah I can agree wtih you.
-1
#307 to #304 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #312 to #307 - teranin ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]
It depends entirely upon what is being revealed. And all I'm saying is an argument can be made for decency, especially in a store. Ignoring it might prove dangerous for the employee in question due to possible charges brought by angry parents.

That being said, still don't like the way it is presented in this content.
User avatar #142 to #103 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
Never seen the cross dressing people before. Sure that is not just a rumor.
-8
#144 to #142 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
+1
#166 to #144 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
-3
#167 to #166 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
0
#233 to #167 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#236 to #233 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
0
#238 to #236 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#239 to #238 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
0
#240 to #239 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#244 to #240 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
0
#245 to #244 - Sunset has deleted their comment [-]
-1
#246 to #245 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
-5
#162 to #160 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #105 to #103 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
That is about as logical as saying we should ignore people, who has sex in the streets or ***** up the window of mcdonalds while people are eating.
-15
#107 to #105 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #109 to #107 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
There is a difference between fat people and two people exploring their bondage ****** in public.
-17
#110 to #109 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #111 to #110 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
acutally not. I fully believe that intercourse, except a kiss or two, should be kept inside in privacy. ******* , homo or just standard. All are equally bad to look at when in public.
#270 to #111 - theinvisibletheift (08/23/2013) [-]
******* , homo, standard. Lol. Homo, homo, or normal? I think I'm laughing a bit too hard at this.
-16
#114 to #111 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #115 to #114 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
Making out? They were in collar and tight leather suits, that is far beyond just making out.
-16
#117 to #115 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #119 to #117 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
That is the same as saying that there is no problem with going out in public in underwear.
When it is a collar and lether suit there is a problem.
-8
#129 to #119 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #130 to #129 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
Well... She could use a diet, but she isn't doing anything improper in public, so yeah.
-9
#131 to #130 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #133 to #131 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
That is true, but still the collar is going too far.
I would agree with the clothing, but not that she should stay inside because she is overweight.
-7
#134 to #133 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #136 to #134 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
Because exploring ******** in public is a clear 'no no' in every rule about common courtesy and manners.

What if it was people with a ****** for being ***** in public? Would that be ok?
By your own words it would be ok. 'even if it's a bit weird'
-8
#137 to #136 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #138 to #137 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
nudist have beaches.
That are private and made for that purpose.
If bondage people want to go in public and do that, then they should get the same thing.
-8
#139 to #138 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #152 to #139 - europe (08/23/2013) [-]
Yes, that's an awful lot better
User avatar #150 to #139 - europe (08/23/2013) [-]
That's wrong.
-8
#151 to #150 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
#148 to #139 - europe (08/23/2013) [-]
What the hell makes you even say this
-8
#149 to #148 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #145 to #139 - europe (08/23/2013) [-]
lolno
-8
#146 to #145 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #140 to #139 - daniboyi (08/23/2013) [-]
I am european.
But I am also danish and it is VERY rare we see nudist on beaches and we never see bondage people on streets.
-8
#141 to #140 - leal has deleted their comment [-]
 Friends (0)