Look I've got nothing against a public display of affection, regardless of who is being affectionate with whom, but there is a limit and there are laws of public decency for a reason. ******* chaps, a leash, and making out in a retail store is going a bit too far.

When you are an employee at that location, ignoring them is not an option, because customer complaints could be filed due to their actions. I don't like the ******* way this "confession bear" crap plays out, because it seems to be directing at one subgroup of people and not at the overall concept of public tip-toeing on the line of indescent exposure, so I see where you're coming from but just can't agree.

Sorry leal.

HA! you know what, I totally just ******* that from the "fully clad in leather" part.

It seemed like the implication was that it was ******* , but OP could be a total prude. Tell you what, if OP meant it was revealing leather that was ******* , I stand by what I said, but if OP just meant like... leather jacket and pants that were reasonable and stuff, then yeah I can agree wtih you.

It depends entirely upon what is being revealed. And all I'm saying is an argument can be made for decency, especially in a store. Ignoring it might prove dangerous for the employee in question due to possible charges brought by angry parents.

That being said, still don't like the way it is presented in this content.

Never seen the cross dressing people before. Sure that is not just a rumor.

That is about as logical as saying we should ignore people, who has sex in the streets or ***** up the window of mcdonalds while people are eating.

There is a difference between fat people and two people exploring their bondage ****** in public.

acutally not. I fully believe that intercourse, except a kiss or two, should be kept inside in privacy. ******* , homo or just standard. All are equally bad to look at when in public.

******* , homo, standard. Lol. Homo, homo, or normal? I think I'm laughing a bit too hard at this.

Making out? They were in collar and tight leather suits, that is far beyond just making out.

That is the same as saying that there is no problem with going out in public in underwear.
When it is a collar and lether suit there is a problem.

Well... She could use a diet, but she isn't doing anything improper in public, so yeah.

That is true, but still the collar is going too far.
I would agree with the clothing, but not that she should stay inside because she is overweight.

Because exploring ******** in public is a clear 'no no' in every rule about common courtesy and manners.

What if it was people with a ****** for being ***** in public? Would that be ok?
By your own words it would be ok. 'even if it's a bit weird'

nudist have beaches.
That are private and made for that purpose.
If bondage people want to go in public and do that, then they should get the same thing.

Yes, that's an awful lot better

That's wrong.

What the hell makes you even say this

lolno

I am european.
But I am also danish and it is VERY rare we see nudist on beaches and we never see bondage people on streets.