Upload

Login or register

x

Funnyjunk Notification

FJ is now mobile friendly. Try it out on your mobile browser!

Click to expand

Extremist

By: User has deleted their account.

random + Fav Comment

Extremist. just so you can view the post and comments that will follow Yes, I know I didn't blank out the name, but what is the point if I am just going to give

[url deleted]
just so you can view the post and comments that will follow
Yes, I know I didn't blank out the name, but what is the point if I am just going to give you the link to his post anyways?

Each F Starbucks
dear Starbucks, you are absolutely disgusting for supporting the "right"
to own a gun. Do you know how many people have died from gun
violence? no I guess you dont cause you sit up in your fancy little offices
and dont pay any attention to other people in the world. Iused to drink
your coffee all the time and i regret it now, just thinking about it makes
me sick. please burn in hell. for more information please visit
************** . com thanks!
Like . Comment . Q 3 . 11 minutes ago near tit

...

Recommend tagsx

+584

Views:	47416
Favorited:	20
Submitted:	08/22/2013

Share On Facebook

Add to favorites

submit to reddit

Comments(335):

Leave a comment

Refresh Comments

[ 335 comments ]

What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.

+10

#71 - vissova (08/23/2013) [+] (29 replies)

If I threw a pencil at your face, would you blame the pencil? And then ban pencils for
violence? No. You would blame me for throwing it at you. That's just logical. Anyone
would agree. So if that's the case, why the **** are we blaming guns for stuff like this.
It's the person with the gun, not the gun itself.

+104

#80 to #71 - navadae (08/23/2013) [-]

Comment Picture

+9

#91 to #71 - kaiizel (08/23/2013) [-]

Hur dur, lets compare guns to pencils.

+4

#127 to #71 - icefall (08/23/2013) [-]

Disclaimer: not trying to say whether there should be a ban or not.

Your argument is flawed since the pencil and gun analogy are not equivalent.
-A pencil's main use is to write, thus by throwing it you are not using it for its intended use. Guns in the other hand are weapons, thus intended to be used to harm or kill.

Your analogy would be more correct if you were to compare guns with a katana, which is also a weapon. Then the story is a completelely different isn't it?

0

#301 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

because the idea is guns make it way too easy, if you think about it it's almost godlike power, killing a person by twitching your finger

0

#299 to #71 - drastronomy ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]

a pencil is not a tool people often use to kill

0

#296 to #71 - trollolololgabe (08/23/2013) [-]

"The blade itself incites to acts of violence"--Homer; Its not that I agree or disagree its just people believe that weapons incite violence just by being there.

0

#272 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

Guns are made for the purpose of killing people. Pencils are used to write and draw. It can also be the same with knifes, yeah people use them to kill people but if you ban them we won't be able to cut food.

0

#270 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

You really don't see nothing wrong with your idiotic analogy? Here, let me caps it up for you. A PENCIL HAS OTHER USES, A GUN DOESN'T. THAT'S WHY COCAINE, HEROINE AND OTHER HEAVY DRUGS ARE OUTLAWED FOR BEING ABLE TO **** UP YOUR LIFE, BUT GLUE ISN'T, ALTHOUGH YOU CAN STILL SNIFF IT AND YOU CAN OVERDOSE ON IT TOO.
Grow the **** up, idiot.

0

#268 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

a pencil doesn't have the same capacity to kill a large amount of people though.....

0

#193 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

all these faggots below keep talking about how guns are manufactured for the sole purpose of harming and killing.

what about sport? there is a skill in being accurate, even with an assault rifle. most people who own guns hunt animals OR they shoot stupid **** in their backyard, like clay pigeons and bottles from long distance as it takes talent to do so.

0

#167 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

Pencils aren't manufactured to kill human beings

0

#163 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

If multiple cases of a certain brand of pencil being thrown were brought forward in the judicial system and a strong case was made by the politicians supporting the bill they could determine the pencils to be a cause of violence and ban them.

Moral of the story: always fistfight. It's more manly and no one can take your fists away.

0

#104 to #71 - anonexplains (08/23/2013) [-]

Guns are a MEANS for KILLING.
Pencils are not MADE to pepper people to death.

Guns are made for the sole purpose of killing people, pencils are not.
Your argument is highly illogical.

0

#75 to #71 - sassmastawillis (08/23/2013) [-]

pencils are made to write, not fight

-1

#312 to #71 - vissova (08/23/2013) [-]

Guys, I realize you can't compare a pencil to a gun, but I was using a pencil as an easier
way to explain that you shouldn't blame something on an inanimate object that had
no choice on whether or not you get hurt. Don't take it so literally. :u

-1

#264 to #71 - skumbaner (08/23/2013) [-]

Pens don't kill people

-1

#248 to #71 - danimer ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]

Yeah well I still think we should illegalize guns beacuse it doesn't even matter whos' fault it is beacuse people get hurt anyway

-1

#242 to #71 - toggme ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]

Mostly stupid people actually use a gun to kill others. And having guns so accesible would make it easier for those to commit crimes.

-1

#234 to #71 - reredrumuoy (08/23/2013) [-]

but guns are completely unnecessary they are just an invention to kill people more effectively. And the reason we have the right to bear arms is because 200 years ago we needed to defend ourselves from peyote tripping, peace loving, savage redskins.

but guns are completely unnecessary they are just an invention to kill people more effectively. And the reason we have the right to bear arms is because 200 years ago we needed to defend ourselves from peyote tripping, peace loving, savage redskins.

-1

#177 to #71 - xnotcreative (08/23/2013) [-]

The reason why people are trying to ban guns is because it reduces the amount of mentally unstable people getting their hands on that equipment capable of ending someone elses life in a matter of seconds.

Look at Europe and how well most of them are doing without guns.

-1

#162 to #71 - lazypaul (08/23/2013) [-]

I would blame whatever government allowed you to own a gun, enabling you to shoot me in the face.

-1

#114 to #71 - ruebezahl (08/23/2013) [-]

It's funny actually that the same political forces that go on about how "Guns don't kill people" are the ones that advocated invading Iraq, because they were afraid Saddam Hussein might have weapons of mass destruction.

-1

#93 to #71 - emotep (08/23/2013) [-]

That argument is so flawed, and you put those who support the right to bear firearms in a bad light.
By your logic everyone should be allowed to own a nuclear warhead and a detonator for it, and why not some chemical weapons to go along with that? I mean it's not the weapon that has a problem. Yes a rifle is a tool just like a pencil, but a pencil is a tool for writing, and a full automatic assault rifle is a tool for killing people; a lot of them, and fast. There's a pretty big difference.
When you enable people on a mass scale (allowing them to own weapons), someone is bound to take actions they wouldn't otherwise have (If they had to illegally acquire one for example), which is why it is quite a difficult matter to legislate about as allowing people to bear firearms has certain pros as well, one being self defense.

-1

#72 to #71 - herberto (08/23/2013) [-]

Except a pencil can't kill a group of people with a few shots.

-2

#216 to #71 - olibear (08/23/2013) [-]

I couldn't really care less about this stuff. I see where you're coming from. However, I feel that your argument is invalid. I mean, pencils are not made for hurting someone. They have other uses. Proper uses. Whereas a gun is made for killing someone, which at most times is a lot worse than hurting someone. Yes, you can kill people with other stuff, but it's a lot easier to kill someone with a gun. (A weapon made lethal)

-2

#73 to #71 - RandomAnonGuy (08/23/2013) [-]

To play the devils advocate, if a pencil was primarily used to stab someones eyes out and was as widely available as it is, there would be huge pushes to ban pencils. It's not about blaming the guns, it's about removing the tools that are used to cause harm.

+36

#115 - EventHorizon (08/23/2013) [+] (59 replies)

Picture this: You're standing in line at Starbucks, waiting to receive your Double Mocha **************************** with you 98 year old Holocaust survivor grandmother, brand new bouncing baby girl and your new charming rags-to-riches gentleman husband. You're all giddy with excitement, discussing your upcoming trip to the inner city to volunteer at a soup kitchen that is renting space at a terminal cancer orphanage.

Suddenly, a crazed lunatic busts through the door ranting about how communist Obama is destroying the world and that his magic 8-ball told him that "Sources say yes" when asked if Obama was the Anti Christ.

He then proceeds to open fire on the entire store with hollow point incendiary rounds, hot lead ripping and tearing through the coffee lovers' bodies like a steak knife through butter. You're entire family is massacred before your eyes as you helplessly cower behind the coffee grinder.

The gunman is eventually killed by police in a massive shootout,; you're psychologically scarred for life and eventually have to be institutionalized for extreme PTSD and trauma-induced psychosis. In the meantime, the entire nation is up in arms over the "scourge" of gun-related violence, screaming out that guns are simply instruments of death and should be banned entirely from every public place.

Now, instead, picture that exact same scenario except standing in line behind you is another man with an open-carry permit and a Barretta strapped to his hip. Our crazed friend bursts through the door, and proceeds to encounter a barrage of 9mm glory. He never gets to take a single victim with him on his trip to the depths of Hell, you get to go on your honeymoon and **** like a rabbit on the beaches of Bora Bora, and the nation proceeds to sing the graces of the 2nd Amendment and all that it has to offer.

Bottom line: the very complaints these anti-gun critics make would result in the very changes that would make the former scenario the only possible outcome.

0

#345 to #344 - volleys (08/26/2013) [-]

Vigilantes are someone who goes out of their way to prevent crime, like Batman. Self defense, my topic, is in a whole other category.

And I've showed that guns have no correlation to increasing/decreasing homicide rate. The US homicide rate has dropped by half, but firearms sales have sky rocketed. Guns don't even have to be used to prevent crime, they only have to have the possibility of being present. If a criminal knew 75% of all homes owned a gun would he take the massive risk of breaking in?

So to say I'm not grasping the concept is irrational.
It is you who have not grasped anything.

0

#346 to #345 - gerfox ONLINE (08/26/2013) [-]

No, you haven't shown that guns have no correlation - you've just pointed to the UK homicide statistic, we haven't looked into details about gun laws there, and for instance cultural differences (like I have already pointed to, but you seem to ignore that).

My point is still, as I said initially - easy gun access prevents criminality, but increases the homicide rate. Low gun access increases criminality, but decreases the homicide rate. That's the logical thing, and since I'm too lazy to look after proof, I suggest we end our discussion here. In any regard, it wasn't my intention to start discussing with someone who isn't willing, or able, to grasp what I think is logical.

Thank you for the discussion, at least you convinced me guns are a good thing for preventing crime albeit not homicides.

0

#347 to #346 - volleys (08/26/2013) [-]

I've pointed out multiple times that the US homicide rate has dropped drastically from 1993 to 2013 and in those 20 years firearms sales have increased dramatically.

Just look at my comment with all the sources.

Just because you think firearms increases homicide doesn't make it so.

0

#334 to #333 - EventHorizon (08/24/2013) [-]

Oh you're absolutely right, guns are terrible. They're tools of death, and have no place in civil society. But basing your personal beliefs on gun control on the idea that they're just bad is an absolute waste of your mental abilities. You're obviously an intelligent person, but what do you want to happen? You cannot remove guns from this Earth, you literally absolutely can NOT. They are here to stay, and human nature dictates that where there's a will there's a way and the will for human aggression far outweighs any fickle piece of legislation. I'm not debating with you that guns are bad; they are. I'm debating with you on how we can work around human nature, or better yet work with it, to make gun ownership a safer venture in the world.

Also, do you realize that mas shootings are responsible for less than 100 out of 12,000 homicides in the US each year? They're sudden and tragic, THAT'S why they receive such sweeping media attention, outrage and sympathy. If the media devoted as much air time and emphasis to mass shootings as they did every other homicide, the nation would hardly notice.

+22

#3 - teranin ONLINE (08/22/2013) [+] (5 replies)

That was Gagliardi, right? Zach Gagliardi?

That was Gagliardi, right? Zach Gagliardi?

+16

#5 - ffffyou (08/22/2013) [-]

This image has expired

Hey the link works.Thanks! gfy.com/

+15

#92 - foelkera (08/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)

Zach Gagliardi sounds like the guy who thinks that a sign saying "Gun free zone" magically converts any firearms within a 5-foot radius into candy and welfare checks.

+8

#76 - punnyjunky (08/23/2013) [+] (6 replies)

Honestly I thought better of Zach Gagliardi...

Honestly I thought better of Zach Gagliardi...

+7

#269 - MasterManiac (08/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)

Starbuck's FW

Starbuck's FW

+7

#137 - anticitezenone (08/23/2013) [+] (3 replies)

I'm not even going to rant
but i will say this

An assassin is a weapon. A weapon doesn't choose to kill. The one who wields it does. - Thane Krios

I'm not even going to rant
but i will say this

An assassin is a weapon. A weapon doesn't choose to kill. The one who wields it does. - Thane Krios

+7

#66 - kingbulbasaur (08/23/2013) [+] (6 replies)

Why don't people realize that even if we do ban guns, it'll cause a chain reaction of so much worse things?
We'll be giving more power to the black market for weapons, a few that already own might riot, there's too many guns in cycle so the gov't would have to confiscate said guns. That'll create an even worse response from the people, even those who don't own guns. There's so much more **** that can stem from this but I'm sure most of you can think of it on your own. Since we already have guns around we might as well just keep enforcing the same laws if not a few more, for the sake of safety and not for the gov't to find an excuse to extort more cash!

Why don't people realize that even if we do ban guns, it'll cause a chain reaction of so much worse things?
We'll be giving more power to the black market for weapons, a few that already own might riot, there's too many guns in cycle so the gov't would have to confiscate said guns. That'll create an even worse response from the people, even those who don't own guns. There's so much more **** that can stem from this but I'm sure most of you can think of it on your own. Since we already have guns around we might as well just keep enforcing the same laws if not a few more, for the sake of safety and not for the gov't to find an excuse to extort more cash!

+6

#60 - douthit (08/23/2013) [-]

It's a good thing guns kill people, or else we'd be up ****** creek when we need the cops or military. If you're in trouble but you don't like guns, the first thing you're gonna do is call 911 and have them send a guy with a gun.

+5

#120 - trevcars (08/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)

Okay time for my little rant. Just for the **** of it, I'm gonna tell you all my opinion on guns and gun laws...
Okay, let me start off by saying I do not think all guns need to be banned. To me, that would be very very ignorant and stupid. I do however agree that in the US there should be some changes made. no bans, but just changes. I see a lot of people saying that guns shouldnt be banned and it gets me thinking: who wants guns to be banned? Obama? no, he just wants expanded background checks, unless i'm missing something. I remember reading someone's comment a while back about how if you were teaching a bunch on kindergartners and 1 child began eating the crayons, you wouldnt take all the crayons away from everyone, just that child. Now, like I said I'm not against guns, but what if 5 or 6 kids started eating the crayons? Wouldn't you decide that maybe something should be changed in the classroom? you don't have to take all the crayons out but at least watch the children closer? I just wish people would realize that while taking every gun away would not solve the problem, maybe keeping a closer eye on who buys guns could at least help? I mean, if you feel the need to own an AK-47 I think you're living in the wrong part of town.

+5

#26 - flemsdfer

ONLINE (08/22/2013) [+] (7 replies)

I hope he is also against all military and police. They have guns too, and guns kill people.

+4

#298 - roliga (08/23/2013) [-]

Starbuck's stance on the whole allowing people to carry guns is not supporting either side, they've released a statement SEVERAL TIMES saying -

"We are sorry if you are displeased with the current laws surrounding guns in your state, if you feel they should be changed we encourage you to write your senators and local representatives, but Starbucks will uphold whatever laws are currently in place. Thank you."

That's not taking a ******* side, that's saying "I'm a ******* coffee shop, leave me out of this **** "

Just because majority of their customers are entitled little liberal **** heads who've never had to stand up for themselves in their life doesn't mean that the owners of Starbucks are too. Now if you'll excuse me I suddenly have a craving for some coffee while OCing my Glock 19 gen 4.

Starbuck's stance on the whole allowing people to carry guns is not supporting either side, they've released a statement SEVERAL TIMES saying -

"We are sorry if you are displeased with the current laws surrounding guns in your state, if you feel they should be changed we encourage you to write your senators and local representatives, but Starbucks will uphold whatever laws are currently in place. Thank you."

That's not taking a ******* side, that's saying "I'm a ******* coffee shop, leave me out of this **** "

Just because majority of their customers are entitled little liberal **** heads who've never had to stand up for themselves in their life doesn't mean that the owners of Starbucks are too. Now if you'll excuse me I suddenly have a craving for some coffee while OCing my Glock 19 gen 4.

+4

#159 - gibroner (08/23/2013) [-]

can we all agree to stop blaming inanimate objects for things humans do

+4

#57 - arkadia ONLINE (08/23/2013) [-]

Crack is illegal which means there's no one in the world that smokes crack, rite?

+4

#6 - jacklane (08/22/2013) [+] (7 replies)

I went ahead and replied to one of his comments, but then I went into his profile and saw some **** about how elysium is tied to Republicans. The kid has obviously been brainwashed by whatever institution he is attending. It's funny... you're supposed to keep an open mind when going to college. However, once indoctrinated, you turn into a biased liberal. They love to say **** that doesn't make sense. You can't argue with them, because they have been brainwashed. It's a fact that 95% of sociology teachers are far gone liberals. Hell, my teachers get education boners just talking about Karl Marx!

+3

#261 - npfortytwo (08/23/2013) [+] (1 reply)

So basically, this guy thinks that Starbucks is disgusting for respecting various state laws regarding concealed and open carry.
His comment could have been rephrased as "You are absolutely disgusting for knowing state laws."

So basically, this guy thinks that Starbucks is disgusting for respecting various state laws regarding concealed and open carry.
His comment could have been rephrased as "You are absolutely disgusting for knowing state laws."

+3

#105 - loganhusted (08/23/2013) [-]

I think it is funny that there are people that are this stupid. Starbucks doesn't support Pro gun. They don't support Anti-Gun. They are Neutral. But i guess if your not against Gun Rights then you are for them in the eyes of these people.

I think it is funny that there are people that are this stupid. Starbucks doesn't support Pro gun. They don't support Anti-Gun. They are Neutral. But i guess if your not against Gun Rights then you are for them in the eyes of these people.

+3

#53 - xdeathspawnx (08/23/2013) [+] (3 replies)

yeah we should just ban all guns and no one will ever be shot!

because criminals and gang members totally don't have access to anything that is illegal

yeah we should just ban all guns and no one will ever be shot!

because criminals and gang members totally don't have access to anything that is illegal

0

#150 - therealtjthemedic ONLINE (08/23/2013) [+] (3 replies)

Comment Picture

+2

#157 to #154 - largeheadphones (08/23/2013) [-]

NOT ANYMORE! ******* DEMOCRATS! PLACING RULES ON EVERYTHING!

[ 335 comments ]

Leave a comment

<

>

Friends (0)