Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
So you decided to illustrate your point that 'making fun of someone is wrong' by making fun of someone?
#151 to #3 - anon
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
there's a difference between making fun of someone because they are retarded and making fun of someone because they are being a dick.
#101 to #3 - coolcalx
Reply -1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I'm just going to hope you were thumbed down because you were anon and because of the bandwagon effect.

I refuse to think people are this hypocritical.
#89 to #3 - penguinsaresexy
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Found the fatty
#81 to #3 - mrfourtysevenman
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
retardation isnt a choice

being fat is

how can you not grasp that concept?
#43 to #3 - franger
Reply +1
(08/22/2013) [-]
A retard doesn't choose to be retarded, whereas a fat person becomes fat through their lifestyle choices. Making fun of them is very different. If you're fat and don't like being looked down on then quite the sedentary, buccal packing lifestyle you lead.
#63 to #43 - kafudamapla
Reply +1
(08/22/2013) [-]
Nah mate it's glandular
#17 to #3 - kimilsung
Reply +11
(08/22/2013) [-]
That's how life works you ********.
#7 to #3 - qazsa
Reply +1
(08/22/2013) [-]
well it's like the saying from the code of hammurabi "an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth".
#8 to #7 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
"Eye for an eye makes the whole world blind."

No valid point was ever made with hypocrisy.
#44 to #8 - manwithmanynames ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
So if one who has murdered ten people is put on death row, you would fight to keep him alive. Sometimes giving someone a taste of their own medicine is the only way for justice to be done.
#88 to #44 - scousaj
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Yes I would fight for that criminal to stay alive. Stooping to their level is ridicolous. We view ourselves as above them, why not act like it?
#124 to #88 - manwithmanynames ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
It wouldn't be stooping to their level, we would be putting an end to one who brought pain to families by killing a member. He made his choice, he killed, and he should pay with his own life.
#134 to #124 - pwnmissilereborn **User deleted account**
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
What would that accomplish exactly? Would it bring the said member back? Would the family feel happy and simply forget it ever happened?
#135 to #134 - manwithmanynames ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
No, it wouldn't bring said member back, but it would ensure, without a doubt, that that particular criminal wouldn't anyone else. The family won't forget what happened, but it would help prevent any other family from feeling the pain. Will we always have criminals? of course, but at least we won't be taking it easy on them and they will see that they won't be given special treatment for a wrongdoing.
#152 to #135 - scousaj
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
The death penalty does not deter crime. And what a waste of human life, and how are you so sure that the criminal does not have a valid explanation for their crime. A crime of passion (your wife cheats on you and sucks a mans dick in your face - you're gonna get pretty mad, could kill somebody) for example. The point is, all crimes need to be handled differently and a punishment given to rapist A should not automatically be given to rapist B. Prison needs to be more tailored to the individual prisoner and in actually trying to make them a productive member of society again.
#153 to #152 - manwithmanynames ONLINE
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
It certainly deters crime more than putting them in a prison with food and health care, I know its not all sunshine and roses, but dp deters crime more. There is no truly valid reason for a crime. Even if in said reason, one shouldn't kill for that. I'd be pissed, but killing isn't the answer for that. Why should rapist A be treated any differently than rapist B, they both committed a horrible crime. Im not saying they should get the chair instantly, but when one has killed repeatedly, prison definitely didn't work.
#25 to #8 - sirnigga
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
theres at least a half blind guy and another guy fighting a tree or car or house
#22 to #8 - nightmaren
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
No it doesn't, there'll be one guy left with one eye.
#9 to #8 - qazsa
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
It isnt about hypocrisy, it is about justice and punishment, in that situation what would they have done? Ignored her? I mean I guess this would probably make her feel empowered and just keep doing it to people, maybe she keeps doing this and ends up failing in life because of her arrogant nature, maybe she does it to the wrong person and they attack her. I mean at least with this it will at least make her consider the pain she has caused others and not do it again even though it probably wont.
TLR Justice will prevail.
#12 to #9 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
You can justify it however you like, it's still hypocrisy by any definition ofthe word.
#77 to #12 - countbleck
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
Does standing around part of the definition "hypocrisy?"
#16 to #12 - qazsa
Reply +1
(08/22/2013) [-]
Even if it is hypocrisy, if it is for the right cause does it matter in the end.
#11 to #9 - bloodyspy
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
That's what you get for not using the semicolon, I guess.
#15 to #11 - qazsa
Reply +2
(08/22/2013) [-]
#4 to #3 - metalguitarest
Reply +275
(08/22/2013) [-]
GIve someone a taste of their own medicine and most of the time they stop. There is a difference between insulting someone and defending someone
#141 to #4 - buthow
Reply +1
(08/23/2013) [-]
I like your profile pic.

Excuse my faggotry

#50 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
If thats the case why don't we fly planes into buildings in the middle east instead of killing the taliban.

The system you just explained is like if a kid starts crying so you start shouting "WAHHHH WAHHHH" in its face.
#54 to #50 - garymotherfinoak
Reply +3
(08/22/2013) [-]
...just no.
#14 to #4 - hsawryt
Reply -2
(08/22/2013) [-]
hes doing the same thing at once...
#6 to #4 - anon
Reply 0
(08/22/2013) [-]
Seem to be using the US version of 'defending' there...
#20 to #6 - vicsix
Reply +5
(08/22/2013) [-]
The best defence is a good offence faggot.
#168 to #20 - vycanismajoris
Reply 0
(08/23/2013) [-]
that's just because you don't know better.
#35 to #20 - rokulda
Reply +6
(08/22/2013) [-]
The best spelling of offense and defense is with s's, faggot.
#37 to #35 - vicsix
Reply +2
(08/22/2013) [-]
The best faggot is an anal faggot, faggot.
#38 to #37 - rokulda
Reply +3
(08/22/2013) [-]
Faggot faggot faggot faggot faggot faggot, faggot.