I like this one. .. More like EVILution
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Comments(262):

[ 262 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#14 - anonymous (08/22/2013) [+] (6 replies)
bogus, look up the Cambrian explosion. a period of time where the fossil record, in a relatively short amount of time, becomes incredibly diverse. it occurs far too quickly for the current theory of evolution to be correct.
User avatar #19 to #14 - rmoran (08/22/2013) [-]
Those millions of years really fly by don't they?
#6 - anonymous (08/21/2013) [+] (7 replies)
well carbon dating is so inaccurate one can get different dates off by thousands of years by testing the same sample and when a scientist gets a date that goes against his theory he often dates it as many times as necessary to fit into his ideas( and so he can continue to get grant money) so actually fossils are dated out of place all the time . just Google some of the modern instances
User avatar #8 to #6 - thenez (08/21/2013) [-]
And evolution doesn't occur across an entire species at the same time.

A population with a mutation could live alongside the original population for many years until the original or the mutated population dies out.
#54 - JENNAY (08/22/2013) [-]
More like EVILution
#11 - xaal (08/22/2013) [+] (3 replies)
I think im retarded. I dont get the flying colours part.

Can anyone explain?
#12 to #11 - ddylann (08/22/2013) [-]
figure of speech means they passed the test really well
#43 - anonymous (08/22/2013) [+] (24 replies)
Straight up, it takes more faith to believe in evolution than it does to believe in creationism. Do you know how many things would have to be exactly right and come together perfectly for it to even work? And the whole "it came about by many small mutations to improve the species" bit is nonsense. Most all mutations are fatal. You think that animals adapt over time? Sure, me too. But the whole "your great great million time great grandma was a shrew like creature" isn't realistic.
User avatar #46 to #43 - iliketires (08/22/2013) [-]
Yeah a lot less believable than man just spawning out of nowhere and then a female spawning from a mans rib.
#84 - kuroking ONLINE (08/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
MFW Religious arguments
MFW Religious arguments
#83 - EventHorizon (08/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
To those of you who claim this statement makes no sense, you need to expand your minds to the finer details:   
   
The time periods between fossil deposit layers can represent millions upon millions of years. In that amount of time, absolutely everything changes: temperature, atmospheric gas levels, atmospheric pressure, biomes, and all of this is compounded by natural selection. If a SINGLE fossil was found out of order, the composition of the fossil would be its downfall, because we can determine a vast number of these variables from the fossil record, i.e. for a simple example the size of dinosaurs is a largely a result of the high levels of oxygen and CO2 in the atmosphere. This is what Dawkins is getting at; if a fossil was found out of place, it would completely stand out in the variables it would reveal about the world in which it died.
To those of you who claim this statement makes no sense, you need to expand your minds to the finer details:

The time periods between fossil deposit layers can represent millions upon millions of years. In that amount of time, absolutely everything changes: temperature, atmospheric gas levels, atmospheric pressure, biomes, and all of this is compounded by natural selection. If a SINGLE fossil was found out of order, the composition of the fossil would be its downfall, because we can determine a vast number of these variables from the fossil record, i.e. for a simple example the size of dinosaurs is a largely a result of the high levels of oxygen and CO2 in the atmosphere. This is what Dawkins is getting at; if a fossil was found out of place, it would completely stand out in the variables it would reveal about the world in which it died.
#52 - herrstig **User deleted account** (08/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #209 - clavatninenine (08/22/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I saw the word "Evolution" at the beginning of this post and I guessed there would be atleast 10 comments bitching about religion vs. atheism.

I was wrong.

There was way ******* more than 10.
#72 - anonymous (08/22/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Show me a fossil imbetween metamorphosis
#103 to #72 - sadistikal (08/22/2013) [-]
my job here is done
-6
#42 - fyaq has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
#56 to #42 - shadowvision (08/22/2013) [-]
I don't think you understand what he was saying. If we found a bunny fossil dated to the Cambrian period, evolution would be wrong. If we found a triceratops fossil dated to the most recent ice age, evolution would be proven wrong. Period.
#201 - oubliette (08/22/2013) [+] (8 replies)
#220 to #201 - unggoy (08/22/2013) [-]
I really hope people aren't really thinking that that's all there is to the big bang theory.
#1 - anonymous (08/21/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Well, I was going to post this as a picture but apparently willisteal is blocking me for some reason.

“There is something infantile in the presumption that somebody else has a responsibility to give your life meaning and point… The truly adult view, by contrast, is that our life is as meaningful, as full and as wonderful as we choose to make it.”

Is I think my favorite quote from Dawkins.
User avatar #122 to #5 - buttinspecter (08/22/2013) [-]
Woah woah woah woah! Hang on. This is not over, OP. You want to explain why you blocked him in the first place?
#218 - drooms (08/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#222 to #218 - itsbendingtime (08/22/2013) [-]
Simpler version.
User avatar #125 - PadreRasta ONLINE (08/22/2013) [+] (13 replies)
I was born and raised in a christian family, but never really liked the idea of "God thought about stuff, and they popped there". I also can't understand how "In the beginning, there was nothing, and suddenly, two particles chocked and the universe was formed".
So I decided to create a new theory: God created the evolution. He made all the basic matter, and left it to evolve as they wanted.
I don't have really deep knowledge of science or religion, so there might have some mistakes. Ignore it and change them with the right information.
What do you think, FJ? Anyone wants to add something to it?
TL,DR: I don't like things popping out of nowhere, so I made God create the Evolution.
User avatar #127 to #125 - Crusader (08/22/2013) [-]
No, that's pretty close to Deism.
Deism being the idea that God created the basics and then left everything, sort of like in the Sims where you create and tinker and then let them eventually just kill themselves.

It's the clockwork god theory.
User avatar #99 - biggrand (08/22/2013) [+] (12 replies)
well it still wouldnt prove there's a bearded **** in the sky who bowls every once in a while
User avatar #108 to #105 - biggrand (08/22/2013) [-]
your parents really sucked if they told you anything other than angels go bowling when thunder strikes. . .
User avatar #59 - aussiedan (08/22/2013) [+] (7 replies)
Question, I know it's probably an over-hyped problem. But where any Americans here taught only creationism or creationism and evolution at the same time at high school?
User avatar #66 to #59 - nevrit ONLINE (08/22/2013) [-]
Only evolution. I'm north eastern in the states. Pretty much we are taught evolution because people get upset when teachers even mention religion in school. I'm all for the don't push your religion off on people policy, but on not for the don't state your opinion because it offends me crap.
#26 - Sabre ONLINE (08/22/2013) [+] (9 replies)
I really have to fight the urge to disagree with anything that man says on principle because he's a bigoted asshole who tries to hide prejudice with bravado. He's smart, yes, but come on man; live and let live! Don't go picking fights just for the sake of stroking your ego!
#39 to #34 - traceirving (08/22/2013) [-]
I've heard a lot of his stuff about this topic and while I see what your point is, he's not wrong. The point he's making isn't that people who can't quote the bible ARE NOT ALLOWED TO BE CHRISTIANS in such a way. His point is that a lot of people, when given a survey on their religion will say they are Christian, even if they don't believe in god.

This is a big problem in England specifically, and it IS a problem because it means that higher ups in the C of E are getting power based off of the fact that people are, in their ignorance, identifying as Christian.
Essentially, it's like voting for someone who you don't even know.
#78 - pxthreezerothree (08/22/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Being Catholic, I get it from both sides but I really can't stand fundamentalist creationism.
#15 - kanedam (08/22/2013) [-]
hasn't that happened quite a few times already...?
and then some time-charts were changed, and experts argue over that again and again, having several different theories the other experts dont really recognise and accept while the normal person just hears a "yeayeah, it's alright! we know the answer"?

and thats most likely what happens with almost every scientific discussion: it simply isn't beeing transported to the masses.
[ 262 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)