Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#109 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2013) [-]
Batman has the cheapest super power in the world:
That of the little **** on the playground who always suddenly had everything proof armor once you beat him in an imaginary game.

Superman can kill Batman from anywhere on Earth within less than a milisecond. Unless Batman attacks first and kills superman before Superman even notices the threat (pretty much impossible with faster-than-light reflexes and ability to hear and see anything), Superman wins.
#134 to #109 - spant
Reply -2
(08/20/2013) [-]
Only the Flash thinks as fast as he moves, though, Superman still would ******* wreck and deck Batman.
#110 to #109 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2013) [-]
Oh, also, an EMP may take out Iron Man, but a bullet from any gun ever made can kill Batman before he even hears the shot fired.

Batman is cool, but if you actually compare abilities, he loses to just about anyone.
#165 to #110 - daghost
Reply 0
(08/21/2013) [-]
Also, it's stated in the comics that Tony has engineered his suit to be resistant to EMP's
#115 to #110 - generaljosh
Reply -1
(08/20/2013) [-]
Don't say Batman has a cheap super power when Superman's power is having whatever powers the writers need to patch up a plot hole.
#130 to #115 - anon
Reply 0
(08/20/2013) [-]
Sure, Superman is cheap, but he actually has a weakness, kryptonite and magic. Batman could kill an immortal, unkillable, god. Why? Because ***************************************3000.
#122 to #115 - nofeelsdaily
Reply 0
(08/20/2013) [-]
The irony here is that batmans armor and equipment has changed many more times than supermans powers have.   
   
   
   
But the overall fact is, as cool as batman is... superman would kick his ass easy every-time.
The irony here is that batmans armor and equipment has changed many more times than supermans powers have.



But the overall fact is, as cool as batman is... superman would kick his ass easy every-time.
#124 to #122 - generaljosh
Reply -1
(08/20/2013) [-]
Of course Superman would win. But they're both fantasy settings, so "who would win" means approximately jack ****. What does matter is the character, and I would argue that a good character has to have at least some flaws.

Hell, I could make up a robot dongzilla that has a trillion miniature death stars attached to its face and is entirely made of kryptonite, but does that mean anyone wants to read about it?
#132 to #124 - RamzaBeoulve
Reply 0
(08/20/2013) [-]
Superman has plenty of flaws. 'Not having a flaw' counts as one, if you want to go that route.
#129 to #124 - nofeelsdaily
Reply -1
(08/20/2013) [-]
Oh don't get me wrong, batman is such a better character then superman could ever be.... for the main reason... well... he's the fooking batman! No explanation really needed