Arguement for gay marriage. . Joke ofthe week I daon' tunderstand why people are against gay marriage. Their main argument is that it' stearing away at auraalic Arguement for gay marriage Joke ofthe week I daon' tunderstand why people are against Their main argument is that it' stearing away at auraalic
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (40)
[ 40 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #1 - nuciferatu
Reply -54 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
Has anyone ever considered that gays are awesome because they're self-contained? Think about it! A gay person needs a person of his gender to get with, who must ALSO be gay! It's a closed group. They honestly can't bother anyone! I've heard gays being compared with pedophiles or people into bestiality but it's totally different! A pedophile needs a child to be pedo with. He can't use another pedophile. And a horse ****** can't get with another horsef ucker. It needs to be a horse. Gays, though, are gonna be gay-with-gay all the way. Doing their gay thing. Not bothering anyone. Why do people still have a problem with this?
User avatar #14 to #1 - Gerex
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]

They can not reproduce, so they recruit.

Should of become extinct a long time ago.
#9 to #1 - anon id: bf2a07fa
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
You are getting thumbed down because even though your premise that gay people are just another group of people is okay and obvious, your explanation for them being so is just wrong I'm sorry, in know people are entitled to their opinions but your opinion is wrong and stupid but mostly wrong. Stop.
#18 to #1 - lawerancearm
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Wallace would say otherwise.
#19 to #1 - anon id: b8821988
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
>People want others to acceptgays.
>Thumbs them down when they do.

Like ******* seriuosly? It doesn't matter how he rationalises it what matters is that he's accepting.

THIS IS WHY THERE ARE STILL HOMOPHOBES!!
User avatar #30 to #19 - cmilanes
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
its just his way of defending gays is soooooo bad.
User avatar #32 to #1 - newforomador
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
I agree with what you're saying, but you're saying it in a completely wrong way.
User avatar #33 to #1 - brettyoke
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Becaus of gay parades and flamboyant assholes who annoy the **** out of everyone.
#44 to #1 - nuciferatu
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
So much beautiful rage! I must have enchanted my comment with Major Jimmyrustling by mistake.   
It was worded in a limited and idiotic manner on purpose to patronize US congressman levels of thinking. Since pretty much any kind of intellectual discourse seemed to be above "their" level.   
And when I say "their" I mean the level of people who discriminate against non-heterosexuals "because it's wrong" or "because the bible says so". Oh, or my personal favourite "because they'll turn our children gay".   
Beyond any other "intellectual" - read "common sense" - argument that they're just regular people like other regular people, and they should have regular people rights and not be subjected to the bigotry of blinkered biblethumpers, the fact stands that, objectively, they're not bothering anyone.    
If a gay man runs around naked blowing a vuvuzela, he's bothering the people that he is subjecting to his noise and his indecent exposure. But if he's sitting on a bench eating a sandwich, he's not bothering anyone, despite the fact he's gay! Shocking, I know!   
In the spirit of "my freedom ends where the next person's freedom begins", the fact that they're gay shouldn't preclude them from being able to marry, raise children, vote, learn to swim, feed pigeons or what have you. They shouldn't lose basic human freedoms,just because they're in a sexual minority that a 2000 year old book decided to hate on or that is considered "offensive" to that one suburban mom who thinks 50 shades of gray is ok, but homosexuality isn't.   
Feel free to thumb this one down even harder. We can hold a contest!
So much beautiful rage! I must have enchanted my comment with Major Jimmyrustling by mistake.
It was worded in a limited and idiotic manner on purpose to patronize US congressman levels of thinking. Since pretty much any kind of intellectual discourse seemed to be above "their" level.
And when I say "their" I mean the level of people who discriminate against non-heterosexuals "because it's wrong" or "because the bible says so". Oh, or my personal favourite "because they'll turn our children gay".
Beyond any other "intellectual" - read "common sense" - argument that they're just regular people like other regular people, and they should have regular people rights and not be subjected to the bigotry of blinkered biblethumpers, the fact stands that, objectively, they're not bothering anyone.
If a gay man runs around naked blowing a vuvuzela, he's bothering the people that he is subjecting to his noise and his indecent exposure. But if he's sitting on a bench eating a sandwich, he's not bothering anyone, despite the fact he's gay! Shocking, I know!
In the spirit of "my freedom ends where the next person's freedom begins", the fact that they're gay shouldn't preclude them from being able to marry, raise children, vote, learn to swim, feed pigeons or what have you. They shouldn't lose basic human freedoms,just because they're in a sexual minority that a 2000 year old book decided to hate on or that is considered "offensive" to that one suburban mom who thinks 50 shades of gray is ok, but homosexuality isn't.
Feel free to thumb this one down even harder. We can hold a contest!
#41 to #1 - swagbot
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Totally right.



-50 thumbs.



Wat.
#10 to #1 - blademontane
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
#12 to #1 - lucarioveethree
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
>I love gays!
>We should let them do what they want!
>I mean, they're on the same level as pedophiles and animal *******, but at least they aren't harming anyone!
#42 to #12 - swagbot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
"I've heard gays being compared with pedophiles or people into bestiality but it's totally different."

Yeah. Nah. Cunt.
#3 to #1 - icecreamonnips
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
yeah, no
User avatar #5 to #3 - nuciferatu
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
No to... which part?
#6 to #5 - sketchfactor
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
All of it.
All of it.
#7 to #6 - nuciferatu
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
#27 - BIGSEXYISBACKAGAIN
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
#4 - vissova
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
Honestly this whole thing that's been going on forever about gay
marriage is just silly. I'd rather live my own happy life than worry
about whether or not my neighbor is gay. Are we also
going to worry about whether or not people like the color
pink? That's a huge problem too!
#23 to #4 - unikornking
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Who is that?
User avatar #15 - gayboard
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
I promise to put soda in the drinking fountains and canned bacon in the snack machines.


Vote for Gayboard.
#37 to #15 - icecreamonnips
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
you have my vote
#29 - technique
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#39 to #29 - thorseph
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#40 to #29 - anon id: 67783147
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
This is the tenth time I've seen this today and each time with fewer and fewer thumbs...you people thumbwhored this gif into oblivion, I hope you're happy.
User avatar #24 - anonefgthree
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
I support gay marriages, but the extremely in your face gay people are really ******* annoying, and wish they could **** off
User avatar #31 - andrewolfzoom
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
the reason i don't really care if someone is gay is because if they are more women for me. now the reason why i hate lesbians is because they take away the women but just watching is ok too
User avatar #34 to #31 - moshimoshi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
No, no. Lesbians are a challenge. And if you really win the lottery so to speak, you get a 3way.
#35 - anon id: 06115bb6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Gay marriage should be legal, but religious institutions shouldn't have to recognize it. You hear a lot about tolerance for gays, but not for those that don't believe in it. If they weren't forced into allowing the marriage in their church, I don't think anybody would have a problem with it.
User avatar #36 to #35 - suppression
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Forgot to log it. If my ship burns, I will stay with it.
#26 - mogex
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/19/2013) [-]
Yeah, gay/lesbian couples produce no off-spring unless its female and they use an artificial injection of sperm.

Though I'm not sure if that tearing at the so-called "social fabric", its more like depopulation if homosexuality becomes increasingly common, though with the exception I listed above.
#2 - anon id: d3501150
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(08/18/2013) [-]
It's because in a lot of religions such as Christianity, they believe marriage is between a man and a woman. Also it's not that gays want the ABILITY to "marry", they want the definition of "marriage" to be changed. Ever heard of a civil union? Its basically gay marriage, all the legal and social benefits of marriage, but it doesn't get in the way of the definition of marriage and religious views. What I'm saying is, gay people can already "marry" (civil union) without interfering with other people, but "gay marriage" would.
[ 40 comments ]
Leave a comment