Time Travel. give all the credit to www.smbc-comics.com/. Ame Vegas or on ‘TIME: '! me POTENTIAL HINGE realse., we NATION THAT want. 'Ed wouw: -. CHANGING we we
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Time Travel

give all the credit to www.smbc-comics.com/

Ame Vegas or on ‘TIME: '!
me POTENTIAL HINGE realse., we NATION THAT
want. 'Ed wouw: -. CHANGING we wear so
TIME TROJEN NEVER.
lall! NON Stiil rt LL diarea
Act DELL? HAPPEN?
...
  • Recommend tagsx

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - zuckuss (08/16/2013) [-]
*Stark discovery*
#2 - thechosentroll (08/17/2013) [-]
Earlier that day.
Earlier that day.
#10 - burritochan (08/17/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Wait a minute. If they go back and kill themselves, that means they never will have existed. If they never existed, they wouldn't have been able to use the one and only time travel to go back. So, because they never existed to waste it, wouldn't it still be possible to go back again?
#9 - beerholder (08/17/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Might be needed
#6 - paelaer (08/17/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Wait...   
So, if you go back in time to destroy humanity so that time travel wouldn't be discovered, that would mean there would never be humans in the future that would discover time travel which means the humans in the past wouldn't be destroyed before time travel could be discovered so really there would be humans in the future because the humans in the past weren't destroyed and they would discover time travel and go back in time to destroy humans before time travel could be discovered but that would mean there wouldn't be any humans to discover time travel for to go back in time and destroy humans so that would mean that there would be humans discovering time travel and going back in time to destroy humans in the past so time travel wouldn't be discovered but then there would be no humans to go back in time to destroy humans and that means humans in the future discovering time travel for to go back in time and destroy humans before time humans destroy travel past in the humans and
Wait...
So, if you go back in time to destroy humanity so that time travel wouldn't be discovered, that would mean there would never be humans in the future that would discover time travel which means the humans in the past wouldn't be destroyed before time travel could be discovered so really there would be humans in the future because the humans in the past weren't destroyed and they would discover time travel and go back in time to destroy humans before time travel could be discovered but that would mean there wouldn't be any humans to discover time travel for to go back in time and destroy humans so that would mean that there would be humans discovering time travel and going back in time to destroy humans in the past so time travel wouldn't be discovered but then there would be no humans to go back in time to destroy humans and that means humans in the future discovering time travel for to go back in time and destroy humans before time humans destroy travel past in the humans and
User avatar #11 to #6 - kikisu (08/17/2013) [-]
I think the scientists meant kill themselves, not all of humanity. But your infinite loops still works. That's why Stephen Hawking said that backwards time travel is impossible, to stop ourselves from breaking the universe.
User avatar #12 - useroftheLOLZ (08/17/2013) [-]
Technically. no, your timeline would split the second the scientists went back, and everything wouldn't reset, so you would all still be ******
 Friends (0)