Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#148 - anon
Reply 0
(08/05/2013) [-]
Ummm to all of you uneducated buffoons. 666 is actually not the number of the beast. It's 626 tbh..
#215 to #148 - anon
Reply 0
(11/27/2013) [-]
For future reference my friend, when correcting someone, especially so derisively, it often helps to BE correct. Not to mention the fact that there is no proof of the original intent either way.

And to think, just a tab away, google could have saved you all of this.
#205 to #148 - brutalfistfuck
Reply 0
(08/05/2013) [-]
<---  Experiment 626.
<--- Experiment 626.
#154 to #148 - itrooztrooperdown ONLINE
Reply +8
(08/05/2013) [-]
You must mean 616?
You must mean 616?
#160 to #154 - pellebauss
Reply +4
(08/05/2013) [-]
damn you, i was going to say the same thing
damn you, i was going to say the same thing
#153 to #148 - cygnuswithasmile
Reply +7
(08/05/2013) [-]
I know you're trying to be clever and bring up that whole 'It was a mistranslation and the number was...' Thing. And whilst that is true, it was originally mistranslated because it was decided 666 had more of a ring to it, the actual number is 616, not 626. So if you're going to correct someone atleast get it right.
#149 to #148 - dedaluminus
Reply +4
(08/05/2013) [-]
In religion, whatever the highest number of people believe might as well be true.