Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #6 - chrolt
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
What I don't understand is why all these different organisations don't team up. I mean we have organisations for equality for gays, races, mentally disabled, religions and sexes.

If they all want equal rights why do they go about it to get individual equal rights for each individual cause? Wouldn't it be simpler to just form one big organisation that wants equality for all?

Or am I overlooking some major flaw in this thinking?
User avatar #35 to #6 - mummyslittlebitch
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
Primarily because that hypothetical organization would be too big to be effective in any way. You need specialization. That's like saying 'why doesn't the blacksmith just do the tanning, shape the glass, build the cathedral, and make the candlesticks too? Sure would save us space.'
User avatar #38 to #35 - chrolt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
Well the red cross does a ******* of different things to aid dozens of poor countries and they seem to do fine.

Besides it wouldn't be anything like your example since there would still be the same amount of members, they would just belong to a bigger organization. Yes it would be more diffcult to manage, but the advantage of having a bigger organization, and therefore more people, would make it harder to ignore and give them more pull politically.
#39 to #38 - mummyslittlebitch
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
Um, yeah the red cross does lots of aid. They're the red ******* cross. What the red cross doesn't do is open up psychiatry clinics and provide landscaping services. Really, how many hyperbolic analogies must I use before you realize your argument is flawed?
User avatar #44 to #39 - chrolt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
I'm saying that equality for all is not that ******* complicated and you'd think an organization could figure out how to do it.

I know this isn't going to happen and that "it's not that simple" but I feel someone should be asking these questions. I just feel that individual organizations seeking equality for individual groups instead of a larger movement seems inefficient.

And as for the analogies, I'll settle for one if it makes sense.
User avatar #55 to #44 - timmywankenobi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
the main reason is equality for all doesn't bring in as much money.
User avatar #56 to #55 - chrolt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
That's a disturbingly good point...

People are idiots.
User avatar #57 to #56 - timmywankenobi
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
eyuup.
#24 to #6 - anon id: a504e946
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
That's like saying we should have a universal vaccine. They're different beasts with different subissues involved. Would you fight malaria the same way you fight AIDs?

If they were the same issues involved, you wouldn't get the awesome joke from the Onion, "White woman tried as black man".
#12 to #6 - anon id: 8eccf7d4
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
well you have to "specialize" in something. its not like they can put biology, physics chemistry, astronomy etc. together just because they are all science
User avatar #10 to #6 - lotengo
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
Femininists dont give a **** about races
******* dont give a **** **** about the disabled
The disabled dont believe in god
The religious dont need equality for gays
gays dont give a **** about feminists

User avatar #110 to #10 - fuzzypickles
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
why not just say blacks?
you didnt say phanacts or biblefags...

im black and i care about the disabled

gosh, when is this whole fascination with the use of the word "******" going to end..
#120 to #110 - lotengo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
i'm dutch and we use the word neger more then the word zwart (black)    
from my perspective black is just as bad as ******. i'm not a racist i just dont know if this is the propper spelling of 'african-american'
i'm dutch and we use the word neger more then the word zwart (black)
from my perspective black is just as bad as ******. i'm not a racist i just dont know if this is the propper spelling of 'african-american'
User avatar #121 to #120 - fuzzypickles
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
are you ******* stupid??

Did you really just say 'from my perspective black is just as bad as ******.'

then go on to say 'i'm not a racist'? ?? ? ? ?

did,
did that just happen???
User avatar #122 to #121 - lotengo
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
in my perspective the WORD black is just as bad as the word ******
Why are u making such a big deal out of this?
#127 to #122 - fuzzypickles
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/28/2013) [-]
no comment.   
   
this conversation is ending here
no comment.

this conversation is ending here