Stealthy. Source is Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal. max? you can 'g", infill' iii MSW WELL. ‘THAT WM. A WASTE 'Est' FIVE MILLION. All the stealth technology in the world is no match for the Mk. 1 eyeball. stealth comic smbc
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (40)
[ 40 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - scarasm
Reply +83 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
All the stealth technology in the world is no match for the Mk. 1 eyeball.
#2 to #1 - scarasm
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
Also B-2 bombers cost about 3 billion each.
User avatar #3 to #2 - postie
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
They averaged out at $2.13 billion each including development, procurement, facilities, construction, and spare parts.
User avatar #13 to #3 - sao
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
I thought they were only 900 million per?
User avatar #40 to #13 - postie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Total procurement costs averaged $929 million per aircraft, which includes spare parts, equipment, retrofitting, and software support. The total program cost including development, engineering and testing, averaged $2.1 billion per aircraft in 1997.
User avatar #41 to #40 - sao
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Gotcha. Well, at least I remembered something from that air plane book I had as a kid.
#4 - kretash
Reply +73 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
didnt expect that
didnt expect that
User avatar #35 to #4 - gernab
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
I chuckle every time I see that, thanks.
#16 to #4 - RAPxMASTER
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#33 to #16 - doubledisme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#12 to #4 - arialynx
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#5 - include
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
Next time try this.
#21 to #5 - remsaman
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
the orange box
#8 - phantomhawkfour **User deleted account**
+14 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #15 to #8 - crazyitalian
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
they're not stealthy, but they are supersonic, and have the heaviest payload of any known bomber
User avatar #18 to #8 - llamasandwhich
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
It said five hundred million, silly goose.
User avatar #19 to #8 - RequieminMortis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
The USAF mainly uses the B-52 for bombing missions, actually, since it's far cheaper to maintain than either the B-1 or B-2. The Lancer and the Spirit only get pulled out for specific missions where their capabilities (supersonic speed for the Lancer, stealth for the Spirit) justify sending them in place of the far more cost-effective Stratofortress.
User avatar #10 to #8 - IamSofaKingdom
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
Comic said 500million.
#14 to #8 - junkinator
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
I dont need to be educated on such a trivial matter to find this joke funny.
User avatar #7 - crazyitalian
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
waste? more like a bargain, b2's go for over nearly 1.2 billion irl
User avatar #11 to #7 - fuzzysixx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
The average cost of one is over $1 billion, because the development was very expensive and only a small number were made. Actually producing one is significantly less expensive.
User avatar #22 - apellon
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
parking level: GTA
#6 - newall
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/26/2013) [-]
it's closer to one billion...
#25 - bummerdrummer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
who the **** has a doggie door in their bathroom?
#29 to #25 - anon id: cf8db51b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
That's a window with a blind
User avatar #27 to #25 - zlawliet
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
They're normally referred to as "windows".
User avatar #26 to #25 - zourch
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
i do actually
#28 to #26 - bummerdrummer
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
in that case i withdraw my question.
#20 - spetsnazvymple
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/27/2013) [-]
holy **** thats cheap for a b2
[ 40 comments ]
Leave a comment