thats cute. do u remember that one time when you - #98324595 added by donutcaptin at GTA logic

#12 - stickdick

Reply+3

(07/24/2013)[-]

#88 to #12 - gurtol

Reply0

(07/24/2013)[-]

you're* dumbass

#13 to #12 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

but you dont point out "drink driving"...

#15 to #13 - holeymoley

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

because "drink driving" is an actual phrase

#37 to #15 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

Drink driving would apply to UK, Australia and New Zealand.

As it implies intent, as opposed to actually being drunk.

You can have a couple of standard alcoholic drinks over a given hour and not be clinically "drunk " as such.

So drink driving leaves things a little more open to explanantion, drunk driving should mean that you were drunk behind the wheel of a car. Which is past tense.

Moral to this story is if you were caught drunk driving, then you have to be drunk, to use the phrase.

As opposed to drink driving, meaning anybody who has had a couple of beers and then gets behind the wheel, technically is or has been drink driving, regardless if they were affected by the alcohol or not.

Which is why most 1st world countries out there have an averaged one size fits all driver blood alcohol measurement road law, of a maximum amount of alcohol that can be tolerated, before it impairs a drivers judgement.

0.5 is the Australian set limit. Which roughly equates to 2 stand alcohollic drinks per hour, all night long with an hour break before you decide to get behind the wheel again..

#16 to #15 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

i think you are refering to drinking and driving or drunk driving.

#17 to #16 - holeymoley

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

You need to login to view this link

#36 to #17 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

#18 to #17 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

oh maybe in the uk where grammar is subpar

#19 to #18 - holeymoley

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

you got proved wrong so you insult my country

real smooth.

#35 to #19 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

#21 to #19 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

whatever you say. drink drive isnt proper grammar. by saying drink drive you are implying drinking then driving. so u can use whatever excuse you want

#28 to #21 - sunnyday

Reply-2

(07/24/2013)[-]

>whatever you say. drink drive isnt proper grammar.
> so u can use whatever excuse you want
> isnt proper grammar.
>u
>oh maybe in the uk where grammar is subpar
>u

This *****.

#42 to #28 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

You need to login to view this link
english majors

#34 to #28 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

#50 to #34 - sunnyday

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

See? Typing in full grammar, while complaining about Grammar, isn't that hard.

Though both terms are usable. As you just proved, both are proper grammar. It contradicts what you were initially saying.

#53 to #50 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

Hardly counts when he copied and pasted it
This guys just doing a good job at proving himself to be an idiot and hypocrite

#29 to #28 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

>donutcaptin

#43 to #29 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

You need to login to view this link
english majors

#48 to #43 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

More evidence against yourself?

#39 to #29 - donutcaptin

-2

has deleted their comment [-]

#46 to #39 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

Someone chose it, although i'm unsure of how you managed to misread it

#49 to #46 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

it was for emphasis. look at your ******* username you ******* faggot

#59 to #49 - sunnyday

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

Now you're name calling?

Seems you've lost. I'll take my leave now.

#51 to #49 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

Like i just said, i didn't chose it..

#52 to #51 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

choose* you hypocritical grammar faggot

#55 to #52 - sunnyday

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

You sir, have a good sense of humour.

#57 to #55 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+2

(07/24/2013)[-]

Why thank you!

#54 to #52 - holeymoley

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

d-did you just shout at yourself?

#56 to #54 - fuckedbyapony

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

I don't even know, these early mornings are getting to me

#58 to #56 - holeymoley

Reply+1

(07/24/2013)[-]

oh god, im convulsing in my chair

#38 to #29 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

#41 to #38 - fuckedbyapony

Reply0

(07/24/2013)[-]

So really you've just quoted a paragraph proving yourself wrong?

#44 to #41 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

You need to login to view this link
english majors

#23 to #21 - fuckedbyapony

Reply0

(07/24/2013)[-]

'by saying drink drive you are implying drinking then driving'
Well that's exactly what 'drunk driving' is...

#40 to #23 - donutcaptin

Reply-3

(07/24/2013)[-]

Drink driving would apply to UK, Australia and New Zealand.

As it implies intent, as opposed to actually being drunk.

You can have a couple of standard alcoholic drinks over a given hour and not be clinically "drunk " as such.

So drink driving leaves things a little more open to explanantion, drunk driving should mean that you were drunk behind the wheel of a car. Which is past tense.

Moral to this story is if you were caught drunk driving, then you have to be drunk, to use the phrase.

As opposed to drink driving, meaning anybody who has had a couple of beers and then gets behind the wheel, technically is or has been drink driving, regardless if they were affected by the alcohol or not.

Which is why most 1st world countries out there have an averaged one size fits all driver blood alcohol measurement road law, of a maximum amount of alcohol that can be tolerated, before it impairs a drivers judgement.

0.5 is the Australian set limit.. Which roughly equates to 2 stand alcohollic drinks per hour, all night long with an hour break before you decide to get behind the wheel again.

#24 to #23 - donutcaptin

Reply-4

(07/24/2013)[-]

so why not just say drunk driving which is proper grammar than **** brain