its because youre 11, haha, faggot

in spain you can have sex at 13....I'm 13.

so then 12 year olds can't. Hence, you cannot legally bang a 12 year old.

I call ******** on everything you've said now.

so, you're 12?

MFW I'm young enough to **** a 12 year old and have it be legally and morally ok.
young enough to **** a 12 year old and have it be legally and morally ok.
**** a 12 year old and have it be legally and morally ok.
have it be legally and morally ok.
legally and morally ok.
morally ok.

I don't give a **** how accepting the world gets. There is no way a 12 year should be having sex. and if you are close enough to that age posting **** like this, you clearly aren't ready for sex either.

Do you think two 13 year olds could have sex and have it be OK?

Why are you people obsessed with sex? I'm starting to guess that FJ really IS run by 12 year olds...I would say no. I am of the opinion that 17 is the most appropriate age for sex, if even then.

Generally, if you feel you need to ask, then the answer usually is "probably not".

I'm 23 now, married, and with a kid. I started dating my wife when we were in middle school and we dated throughout most of high school. We didn't have sex until I was 18 and she was 17. We dated about 5 years and we waited as long as possible. That's not to say we didn't do other things like oral sex or hand jobs. We tried to do the whole abstinence till marriage thing but, hah, good luck with that.

Which is a good thing because she got pregnant when she was 19. I strongly suggest not having sex at all until your at LEAST your senior year of high school, if just to avoid the possibility of pregnancy. High school pregnancy is never a good idea. Consider your life over if you get pregnant in middle school.

If you use a condom and birth control you gonna be OK and if those don't work use the morning after pill.

....noooooooooooooo. You clearly don't get it.

ok. lets try this. what do you think sex is for?

If you love someone or for recreation.

Well, you aren't wrong in that way, but it is more complicated than that. There is a reason why South Park says the appropriate age for having sex is 17. I'll try to avoid being judgmental and will treat you like an adult. This is an adult activity we are talking about. Be honest, but if you get uncomfortable feel free to PM me instead of posting this on a public forum.

Ok. im assuming this whole conversation is trying to justify YOU or someone you know for having sex? would that be an incorrect assumption?

If that is the case, what are you doing it for?

To be honest i dont know i guess its because i live with catholics who think that sex before marriage is horrendous.

well. abstinence until marriage is a good idea...just not very plausible anymore. marriage isnt practical for young people either

I draw the line at puberty. *cough*

Evolution and all that. Everyone else is just in denial.

i agree although technically there have been 9, 8, 7, and even a 5 yr old to have given birth. her name is lina medina. naturally those are freak occurences but hey, worse has happened before our so called 'modern' society formed.

I think 14 is really the youngest it should go, as long as you can show proof you will practice safe sex and safe sex only, know what sex is, know what you're getting in to, etc. Otherwise, 16 seems more than acceptable.

No body can legally " **** " a 12 year old. They aren't old enough to give legal consent at that age

no... cause you're ******* 13. You should be having sex at all...

You aren't old enough to give consent until you're 18.

If you have a 12 year old and a 17 year old, you're good to go.

I don't know where you're from. But Canadian laws give consent to 16 year olds. However, if both people are underage for consent, than it is illegal for both parties involved to engage in sexual active, as neither of them can consent (legally) to do so.

As far as I know, in the US, underagers are fine with other underagers regardless of age.

That is- unless it's something crazy low- like a 6 year old and a 16 year old.

But that's subject to moral scrutiny rather than lawful investigation.

If I'm not mistaken, there can be no more than a five year difference between underage parties engaging in sexual activity in the US. But I'm pretty sure it's legal.