Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Login or register
Your Posts
Login or register
Login / Create Account
Create Account
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Click to Create Account
Login to FJ
reset password
Stay logged in
Click to Login
Log in/Sign with Facebook.
Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
Create Channel
4chan
aww
vidyagaems
animemanga
politics
marvel
Tumblr-Content
dank-webms
OneForAll
RainbowSixSiege
dccomics
oc-comic-makers
WholesomeMemes
starwars
cringe-channel
animals
FJNN
UnlimitFateWorks
Daily-Jokes
warhammer40k
polandball
dungeons-n-drags
Conspiracytime
cat-channel
zawarldo
CartoonGoodness
tf2
stevenuniverse
erma
cyoa
pokemon
DokiDokiClub
kancolle
warframe
MemeComps
ponytime
lol-channel
humanity-f-yeah
Gondola
gwen
Raven
Remaining character count: 4000
Spoiler Image
[ + ]
Image or Video File:
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
0:00
Click to start recording.
Enter Captcha Code:
Scroll to comment?
Back to the content 'When's lunch?'
Refresh
Options
asd
2
new threads.
1
new replies.
#119
-
anon
id:
7ca41b6a
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I'm glad zimmerman was found innocent. He was attacked and according to Florida state stand your ground law he was in the right. You may not agree with the law but it still exists and he had every right to defend himself. It's a fact that the law exists so there's nothing you can say. He was innocent. I'm not commenting on the morality of the situation, just the legality.
#125
to #119
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-14
(07/19/2013)
[-]
He still killed someone.
He should be in jail for a set period of time.
Whether it was an accident, self-defense, or whatever.
#195
to #125
-
anon
id:
7ca41b6a
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I am not talking morally, only legally. He is fine legally.
#132
to #125
-
YllekNayr
Reply
+1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
We'll keep that in mind if someone ever breaks into your home and threatens you at knifepoint. Don't shoot them. That would be bad.
#134
to #132
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-8
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Did Treyvon have a knife?
Because if he did then the gun is justified.
If not then the gun wasn't necessary.
He was 17 years old, zimmerman's like 30. He should be able to beat the **** out of the little cunt unless he was getting ganged up on by a bunch of people.
#135
to #134
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
TIL it's not possible to kill someone with your bare hands, even if you attacked them by surprise.
Also, Trayvon was about the same size as Zimmerman.
#136
to #135
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-4
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I didn't say he should've killed the kid, just beat him up.
Where do you get all this information?
I want to read it from the actual source because I don't trust anyone here.
Too many racists or secret racists trying to make it seem like zimmerman did good because he didn't kill the kid out of a racist spite.
#142
to #136
-
flufflepuff
Reply
+1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
trusting people just because they seem trustworthy is generally a bad idea
#147
to #142
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-3
(07/19/2013)
[-]
You can't trust anyone on the internet.
Half the crap they say online would never be said in person because it's either incredibly racist or because they don't have faith in their idea.
#196
to #147
-
anon
id:
7ca41b6a
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
So now you're the one being prejudice against the people of the internet.
#197
to #196
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-2
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Yes.
Damn ************.
#139
to #136
-
YllekNayr
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Look at the damned pictures. The dude's head was bashed into the pavement.
Is your argument seriously that when someone gets attacked, you should try not to injure your attacker too much? I don't think anyone gives a **** about the safety of the person that attacked them.
You're doing the same thing all Trayvon supporters have been doing: making it about race, when it wasn't, and trying to evade the fact that Trayvon attacked first.
As for "this information", I've read dozens of articles on this. They were ****************.
#146
to #139
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-4
(07/19/2013)
[-]
No **** sherlock, I know he acted in self defense. He got attacked. Of course he's going to be beat up a bit.
No I didn't say that. It's your right to defend yourself but murder is still murder. There should be consequences.
No I am not. I am not making it about race. Are you retarded? I repeat for the millionth ******* time. It's not a racial issue. It's about whether or not this is murder. **** the ethnic backgrounds. That doesn't prove anything. Yes treyvon attacked first, but the question is if the end justified the means? Did this man have to kill someone? Couldn't the gun have been aimed at the Martin's Leg, stomach, or somewhere that would disable him without it being lethal? I want the facts.
No you didn't read dozens of articles. I bet you simply read the title and took that as the truth then ranted with a bunch of people who argue about how zimmerman is innocent because some stupid black people chose to make it about race. I bet you know just as much as I do and that's nothing.
#149
to #146
-
YllekNayr
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Murder =/= killing someone. Murder is murder. Self defense is not murder for the defendant. Death penalty is not murder for the executioner. Most don't consider deaths in war to be murder.
"No I am not. I am not making it about race. Are you retarded? I repeat for the millionth ******* time. It's not a racial issue"
And then you say
"Too many racists or secret racists trying to make it seem like zimmerman did good because he didn't kill the kid out of a racist spite."
"Half the crap they say online would never be said in person because it's either incredibly racist "
Are you kidding? You're not making it about race? Are you sure?
You can't blame the defendant for the assailant getting hurt. That's ridiculous. That's truly ridiculous. That's like if a guy was attempting to rape someone, so the victim smashed his nuts with what she had on hand, which was a lamp, which destroyed one of the would-be rapist's testicles. And then you get mad at the victim. That's ******* idiotic.
Oh, ok. I didn't read them. Ok. I'm sure you know better. Solid logic, there.
And again, making it about race by implying anyone supporting Zimmerman is inherently a racist.
#152
to #149
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-6
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I'm done arguing with you you dumbass.
I'll make it clear for you though.
I'm not making it about race.
I'm making it about Racism!
As in saying other people are basing their facts and beliefs on the racism.
Like how some people say African American, and that one jackass tells you to just call them black and to stop trying to be politically correct all the time.
Or the idiots who are trying to make ****** an official term for ignorant/ghetto black folk even though that's pretty much it's meaning and you know someone's going to use it to insult the non-ignorant ones.
Most of the arguments in support of zimmerman derive from the fact that blacks are making it about race, so people say he's innocent because it's not about race. Since it's not about race like many say he is innocent. Screw the facts right? He wasn't being racist when he killed the kid. He's innocent.
Now stop your autistic rants, I don't really care about this trial anyway.
#156
to #152
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
"I'm not making it about race.
I'm making it about Racism! "
That is the single stupidest thing I've read all week.
"Like how some people say African American, and that one jackass tells you to just call them black and to stop trying to be politically correct all the time. "
.......you know that a majority of black people in the U.S. are not from Africa, right? They're black americans, not african americans.
"Or the idiots who are trying to make ****** an official term for ignorant/ghetto black folk"
liiiiiiiiiiiiiike........Chris Rock?
"Most of the arguments in support of zimmerman derive from the fact that blacks are making it about race, so people say he's innocent because it's not about race. "
No, most of the arguments in support of Zimmerman use evidence from the case. Nobody in support of Zimmerman is using race as a reason why. Everyone in support of Trayvon IS using race as a reason why.
>is an idiot
>calls someone who makes better arguments autistic instead of making better arguments
#165
to #156
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-2
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Dude, my point is you can't grant someone innocent just because they weren't being racist. A crime is a crime.
I never said they were. I'm saying if you want to call someone who's from african decent you should be allowed to call them african american if you want, not black because he might not be african american.
What about Chris Rock? Did he say this in a joke? Did he say it in real life? Why does his opinion matter on the subject of using the word ******? Is it because he's...African American?
I think most arguments in support of him are based on evidence if the supporter is a part of the legal system or followed the case down to every second. Otherwise, they're basing their support on what others are saying even though they're wrong.
>Smarter than you think
>Not better arguments just doing that thing where you nitpick every little thing I missed in my argument as if me not saying that all blacks aren't african american means I'm wrong. Sort of like those people who argue that zimmerman has to be innocent because someone who called him guilty got one meaningless fact wrong.
I know your kind. There's no point in arguing with you because you're just going to nitpick at everything I missed to piss me off because that's the only way you win at debates.
#168
to #165
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-2
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Thought you were done talking to me because I'm autistic or some ****?
He was granted innocence for being found not guilty, not for not being a racist. Guilt and innocence are not dictated by racist or not-racist. There are other things. You know. Like evidence.
You ARE allowed to call them african american. That's valid. It's just not necessary. Black american is equally correct.
The thing you described was pretty much explicitly a comedy bit by Chris Rock. You're calling him one of 'the idiots".
"I think most arguments in support of him are based on evidence if the supporter is a part of the legal system or followed the case down to every second. "
What you have literally just said is that anyone who actually followed every part of the case would find him not guilty.
I'm not nitpicking. I'm refuting each and every part of your statements, piece by piece.
You're still arguing, and you're still mad. How's that going for you?
#187
to #168
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
There you go nitpicking even further.
No one cares about the case's ending, we're interested if it was the right call or no.
Yes I know evidence exists.
Yes I know both are correct.
Yes, a comedy bit by a comedian saying ******** a term, he must be so right and be serious.
Yes I did said that. Good for you for noticing that.
Yes you are. Nitpicking. Refuting means you're proving me wrong. You are not. You're just pointing out all the trivial flaws in my statements.
I'm not even mad.
It's going well.
I like talking to brilliant people like you.
If it weren't for you I wouldn't know what I just said. Or not know what I didn't say.
You're so smart.
#188
to #187
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-2
(07/19/2013)
[-]
"Yes you are. Nitpicking. Refuting means you're proving me wrong. You are not. You're just pointing out all the trivial flaws in my statements."
When your entire argument is trivial flaws, it's very easy to refute.
We've now graduated from anger to condescending sarcastic compliments. Oh goodness, I've never gotten any of those before.
#190
to #188
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
You really are something special.
Can recognize that I missed some points but can't tell that you're being a know it all cunt.
My god you sure do like narrating what's happening.
Are you morgan freeman?
#191
to #190
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-2
(07/19/2013)
[-]
So now we're 100% ad hominem. Not even gonna try to talk about the case any more.
I appreciate all your downvotes. The won't stick for long.
#192
to #191
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Because there's better people down below who have explained the case instead of nitpicking, so I know what I need to know and feel like justice was served.
I'm not downvoting you.
I got better things to do.
But if it makes you feel so bad, I'll thumb you up.
#200
to #192
-
xaviodron
Reply
0
(07/23/2013)
[-]
COMMENT TRAIN CHOO CHOO
#128
to #125
-
yusay
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
We already have our jails filling up and you want to put
more
people in jail for
defending
themselves?
#131
to #128
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-4
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Read my comment below.
Though the fact that prisons aren't too full isn't my concerned.
The government needs to fix that by making it so that less people go to jail(Being more easy on the men who committed a small theft, sold/used drugs, and not imprisoning what may be innocent people).
And I'm not going to discuss why he's innocent and shouldn't go to jail.
He killed someone.
Isn't that all that matters?
If anything he should get some community service or something.
#127
to #125
-
anon
id:
e4c0c108
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Somebody should serve jail time even if they were doing it in self defense?
What the ****
#129
to #127
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-4
(07/19/2013)
[-]
Well I didn't hear anything about the kid having a weapon.
If he was armed, then I guess he was right.
But if the kid was just throwing punches he should've just punched back.
They have these kind of rules for police officers.
They can't pull out a gun if he's throwing punches.
At best only a taser gun.
#198
to #129
-
anon
id:
b52f8e83
Reply
0
(07/20/2013)
[-]
So im bashing your head into the pavement, you are saying you would rather try and fight me off when im trying to split your head open and trying to cause sever head injury/death or would you rather end it before you cant do anything about it or the rest of your life?
ive hear plenty of people say both people made mistakes that night, Zimmerman's mistake was seeing a shady person walk around after a string of crime in the neighborhood and he followed him to make sure he wasnt getting into **** he shouldnt. The Zim man then quit and Trayvon attacked. If Trayvon wouldnt have attacked he would have been alive today.
You attack me im gonna make you realize you done goofed just my .02 cents.
#162
to #129
-
everyziggy
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I don't really care one way or another about the Zimmerman verdict but your argument is flawed. Police officers are trained to use a chain of escalation when dealing with an assailant and responding with proper force is part of their job. Civilians have no such training and therefore are not obligated to respond based on it.
If someone is assaulting you then you are pretty much suppose to assume they are trying to kill you. All it would take is one good hit to knock someone to the ground and allow the attacker to kick them in the head until their skull caves in. Not everyone is honorable enough to stop when the fight is clearly over like you seem to be assuming.
#166
to #162
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I didn't consider that.
Though I'm still left wondering if Zimmerman had no choice but to kill the guy.
I know the verdict has been made, he's legally innocent.
But I wonder if he had a chance to just disable the kid by shooting him in the knee or somewhere non-lethal, but chose to shoot to kill.
Then I would know if he was acting in self defense or if he chose to kill him.
#181
to #166
-
anon
id:
a82c5dcd
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
You don't shoot if you don't intend to kill period, if it's serious enough to constitute the use of a gun it's serious enough to use deadly force, you don't shoot for the leg, or to wound, you shoot to kill, period.
Treyvon was beating his head into the pavement, it was necessary.
#179
to #166
-
bjorntheberserk
Reply
0
(07/19/2013)
[-]
You try aiming in a scuffle. The forensic pathologist even said that the way the bullet went through the shirt and even into Trayvon that he had to have been hunched over Zimmerman. You try aimiing at someone's kneecap when someone is directly on top of you bashing your head in.
#186
to #179
-
sketchysketchist
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
I did not know that.
So I guess zimmerman had no choice and shot what he could get.
Thank you Bjorntheberserk.
The one person who explained it to me and now I know he's pretty much innocent.
Though i still feel there should be some sort of punishment for killing a person.
I'm not demanding everyone feel that way, I just have that kind of moral thought.
#193
to #186
-
YllekNayr
Reply
-1
(07/19/2013)
[-]
"Where do you get all this information?
I want to read it from the actual source because I don't trust anyone here."
Well that idea didn't last long.
Crazy idea that there might exist people on the internet that know what they're talking about, like mr. bjorntheberserk, here.
Back to the content 'When's lunch?'
Top in 24 Hours
Lazy trust fall
1256
8h ago
IT engineer
872
5h ago
Suuuper
816
5h ago
Dad
1260
7h ago
Pwned.
332
3h ago
Bitch got served
1487
8h ago
Yandere
526
3h ago
Not a cat, repeat, not a cat.
390
3h ago
Happy parent
947
8h ago
Retail jobs suck
308
2h ago
Dads comp
486
5h ago
Capybara like..
968
7h ago
F*****
517
4h ago
Poke poke
355
5h ago
Did I just meme someone into Christianity?
865
7h ago
Moth Camouflage
525
5h ago
Accidental Renaissance
960
8h ago
Anon dates a furry
1060
8h ago
Macropenis
1172
8h ago
Anon's favorite weapon
1058
8h ago
OSHA
669
7h ago
Cutest Hug Ever!
743
8h ago
Stuff #234
212
2h ago
cooking with gas
267
3h ago
TESTOSTERONE
371
5h ago
Best headline ever.
363
4h ago
Anon explains difference between STEM and non-STEM
1070
8h ago
Fembot makes good point
1117
8h ago
Anthropology is Racist
439
5h ago
Just friends
664
7h ago
romantic rigid Rook
1136
9h ago
Bulldozer
323
4h ago
Anon plays Rust
483
6h ago
Silverback Just Wants to Play!
812
8h ago
Kink Shaming
873
9h ago
Competitive Dad
592
7h ago
Unstoppable
247
5h ago
Darth
373
6h ago
comp
477
6h ago
JOKE
1576
11h ago