Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Login or register
Your Posts
Login or register
Login / Create Account
Create Account
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Click to Create Account
Login to FJ
reset password
Stay logged in
Click to Login
Log in/Sign with Facebook.
Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
Create Channel
vidyagaems
politics
TumblrContent
4chan
animemanga
aww
WholesomeMemes
FJNN
marvel
dungeonsndrags
cute
starwars
catchannel
dccomics
OneForAll
darksoulstime
trump
erma
pokemon
cringechannel
BestFriends
twitter
furry
UnlimitFateWorks
truestory
cyoa
occomicmakers
Raven
dankwebms
zawarldo
rwby
warhammer40k
polandball
bomango
RainbowSixSiege
warframe
videogames
fallout
Overlord
DailyJokes
Remaining character count: 4000
Spoiler Image
[ + ]
Image or Video File:
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
0:00
Click to start recording.
Enter Captcha Code:
Scroll to comment?
Back to the content 'Math = God'
Refresh
Options
asd
2
new threads.
1
new replies.
#7

tazze
#456
on comments
Rank
#456
Reply
+127
(07/12/2013)
[]
actually, it's 2 and 2
inb4 red thumbs
#148
to #7

animedudej
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
inb4 trip thumbs
#136
to #7

anon
id:
3d49123d
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Nope. This is why notation is critically important.
The radical √n denotes
only
the principal value. The content only shows the principal root, therefore we should only see positive 2's.
#130
to #7

usaisnotamerica
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
But still its =2.
#112
to #7

anon
id:
f7f5f2ea
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
That square root sign means only the positive square root. 2 is the right answer.
#75
to #7

kaxu
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Depends if you are on R or on C
#135
to #75

anon
id:
3d49123d
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
It depends on whether one considers the principal square root function or the multivalued relation. Choosing between R and C is irrelevant (for what anyway? domain? codomain?). You can map from reals to reals with a real image and still have both the positives and negatives. It just won't be a function. R vs C is irrelevant.
#74
to #7

rothingham
Reply
1
(07/12/2013)
[]
2
OR
2, not AND, OR.
#60
to #7

shredheadxd
Reply
+1
(07/12/2013)
[]
If you start with 4, then take the square root, then you are right. The answers are 2, and 2.
But if you start with the square root of 4, then you are wrong. The only answer is 2.
Sincerely,
A 4th year math major, not that anybody cares.
#137
to #60

anon
id:
3d49123d
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Not really. In this case, it's not really clear whether or not we're talking about the just the principal value or not. Unlike written out mathematical notation, words can be ambiguous on this matter. So we clarify,
You start with 4, take the
(principal)
square root, and you will only have 2. Likewise, if you start with the
(principal)
square root of 4, then you will still only have 2.
#143
to #137

shredheadxd
Reply
+1
(07/13/2013)
[]
On the contrary,
When you do the action of square rooting, you must consider the positive and negative cases. Since you do not know whether the square root was principal or not, you must consider both cases. The positive case is the one shown in the content  the principal square root. The negative case will give you 2.
If you start with simply "square root of 4", you have skipped the action of square rooting, and jump right to evaluating the positive case (the principal square root).
It is quite extremely crystal clear.
#202
to #143

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Then would you (should you?) not write in the notation "±√4" as opposed to simply writing the notation for the principal square root?
#204
to #202

shredheadxd
Reply
0
(07/14/2013)
[]
Lemme break it down.
±√4 = +√4 AND √4 (it's "AND" or "OR" depending on the situation)
+√4 = √4 = 2
√4 = 2
So if you just look at the above statements, you can see that √4 = 2. Not 2. Math don't lie!
#205
to #204

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/14/2013)
[]
Isn't that what I've been saying?
√4 = 2 and only 2
√4 = 2 and only 2
That's been my point throughout this entire discussion.
#206
to #205

shredheadxd
Reply
0
(07/15/2013)
[]
that's correct! I wasn't sure what you were talking about, but the math wasn't ambiguous so I just reiterated it.
#207
to #206

ambiguous
**User deleted account**
Reply
0
(07/15/2013)
[]
I stopped looking at porn for this?
#208
to #207

shredheadxd
Reply
0
(07/15/2013)
[]
I usually get off to my own comments too!
#100
to #60

anon
id:
920f3d4c
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
I was going to say this. The difference is subtle, but it's surely there and
will
affect some problems.
#54
to #7

mrloverlover
Reply
+15
(07/12/2013)
[]
everyone is replying to this with math equations etc.
and i'm just sat here thinking what the **** is wrong with that dog
#53
to #7

warbob
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
square root is a function that is always equal or above 0.
mathematically put :
sqrt(x) >= 0
#33
to #7

bronybox
Reply
+4
(07/12/2013)
[]
Get ready to learn ************(s).
As displayed by the graph of a square root function (shown on the left), there are no negative y values, and thus f(x) can never be negative [ sqrt(2) can never equal  2 ]. This is because the square root operation IS A function, and thus their can only be 1 y value for every x value (but not necessarily the other way around).
You are stating one of the most common misconceptions people have once they are taught to solve quadratic equations, observe.
1. x^2 = 4
2. x = sqrt (4)
3. x = ± 2
You make the assumption that the square root of 4 is equal to +/ 2, however, by actual mathematical definition, line 2 holds a mistake. This is because x DOES NOT equal sqrt(4). The correct solution is:
1. x^2 = 4
2. x = ± sqrt(4)
3. x = ± 2
Just as you cannot take the square root of a negative number, the square root of a positive number can never be negative. The radical symbol by definition is only the principal square root, i.e., always positive.
#154
to #33

kikisu
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Wait wait, you're totally wrong. If the square root of a positive number can never be negative, why is 2 squared 4? That one you have up is only the positive, not negative roots.
#169
to #154

bronybox
Reply
1
(07/13/2013)
[]
You're not understanding the definition of a square root. I even put a graph there and everything.
#195
to #169

kikisu
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
I am. If you take the root of 4, its both 2 and 2. But if you already have the square root of four, its just two. I do understand the definition of a square root, with is a number that when multiplied by itself gives you the original. 2 times 2 is 4.
#197
to #195

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
I'm saying the square root operation signified by the radix will only yield the positive roots of a number by definition.
#198
to #197

kikisu
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
If you start with a square root yeah. But if I take a square root it will be both.
#199
to #198

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
But when you take the square root, you are taking the positive and negative root, and you SHOULD technically be using the notation "±sqrt (a)", otherwise what you are writing is simply incorrect by means of notation. You may be doing the right thing in your head, but you're not writing down what you should be.
#200
to #199

kikisu
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
I never said anything about not having the plus or minus sign. But yeah I see what you mean.
#126
to #33

anon
id:
1ead4bf7
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
you sure can take a square root of an imaginary number; you just have to use complex numbers.
[url deleted]
[url deleted]
#128
to #126

anon
id:
1ead4bf7
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
forgot about the stupid url deleting
[url deleted]
[url deleted]
/wiki/Squar e_root
[url deleted]
[url deleted]
omplex.htm
#125
to #33

anon
id:
454c0a4b
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Math'd. Good job.
#119
to #33

ningyoaijin
#390
on comments
Rank
#390
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
>using a badly coded graphing software to demonstrate an incorrect point
#201
to #119

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Type the square root of x into any graphing software and I assure you it will either give you that exact graph (might also include the imaginary part as well, a reflection along the yaxis)
Here's an example from WolframAlpha
#134
to #119

anon
id:
3d49123d
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
The only bad part I see is "the square root of a positive number can never be negative". However, given the context one can easily tell that he's still referring to the principal square root.
Besides this, how is he incorrect? (unless this is what you meant)
#59
to #33

kjelli
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
why are you thumbed down, this is correct
#23
to #7

Kelsenial
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
Good god that's terrifying
#17
to #7

anon
id:
d605668e
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
but thats only if you bring in the square root yourself.
#16
to #7

drfaust
Reply
+1
(07/12/2013)
[]
Actually by definition it's only positive 2. Even though 2 squared is 4, the square root of 4 is 2.
#26
to #16

deathstare
Reply
2
(07/12/2013)
[]
2 * 2 = 4
2 * 2 = 4
(sqrt) 4 = +/ 2
#21
to #16

yunablade
Reply
+1
(07/12/2013)
[]
both results are valid, the correct answer is: +/− 2
#29
to #21

anon
id:
b408037e
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
Both x=+2 and x=2 are solutions to x^2=4. HOWEVER, sqrt(x) is defined as the POSITIVE solution to x^2=4. Hence sqrt(4)=2 and not +/2.
#30
to #29

yunablade
Reply
2
(07/12/2013)
[]
Maybe it's a cultural thing, when I took math I was required to express the results to a square root always as +/ (unless imaginary number) and if the root was part of a bigger operation record both results (when the value is negative and when positive)
#144
to #30

shredheadxd
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
Don't say these things.
#45
to #30

kabuthefox
Reply
+1
(07/12/2013)
[]
math is "universal"
#14
to #7

anon
id:
2ca21213
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
Wut.. square root of 4 is 2, not 2
#24
to #14

nazrix
Reply
2
(07/12/2013)
[]
x² = 4
√x² = √4
│x│= 2
±x = 2
so,
x = ±2
#36
to #24

bronybox
Reply
1
(07/12/2013)
[]
You are 100% correct, there are two solutions to x^2 = 4, ±2
HOWEVER.
You are wrong in the fact that √x² = √4
It should be ±√x² = ±√4
Because √x is a function (let's denote it f(x) = √x)
f(x) can never equal both 2 and 2 when x = 4 by the definition of a function.
#192
to #36

nazrix
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
ever heard of an injective function?
f(x) = f(y) => x=y
there are, however, functions that are not injective. quite many.
#196
to #192

bronybox
Reply
0
(07/13/2013)
[]
An injective function is the basic function we always think of, I don't understand what you mean. The square root of x does happen to be an injective function by it's definition.
#191
to #36

nazrix
0
has deleted their comment
[]
#190
to #36

nazrix
0
has deleted their comment
[]
#42
to #36

metaldrone
Reply
1
(07/12/2013)
[]
STOP IT!!! I'm learning.
#37
to #36

bronybox
Reply
1
(07/12/2013)
[]
Or rather, you aren't wrong that √x² = √4 , it is simply an incomplete statement.
#25
to #24

pooplol
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
thats only if you bring in the square root yourself
#20
to #14

yunablade
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
You might want to reconsider
#15
to #14

palewolf
Reply
0
(07/12/2013)
[]
No, he's correct, 2 multiplied by 2 is 4. That's basic maths.
Back to the content 'Math = God'
Top in 24 Hours
Prehistoric Mosquito
344
2h ago
Hide from the truth
286
1h ago
Street Art 3
317
2h ago
good scary cynical Reindeer
381
2h ago
Honor the fallen
718
5h ago
Wholesome Post
342
3h ago
Who killed journalism
751
6h ago
What a savage man
237
2h ago
Itty bitty kitty committee
502
4h ago
Sharing is caring
1006
6h ago
F22
228
2h ago
Guide dog training.
253
3h ago
When you finish your last rep of situps
333
3h ago
ultra adorable Grouse
375
5h ago
Biggest Fan
183
1h ago
motionless sable Sparrow
645
5h ago
sue dan
720
6h ago
Multi threading
233
2h ago
arrogant squalid beautiful Pony
620
6h ago
Japanese ducks save rice farms from pests and weeds.
95
1h ago
Withdrawal help
1079
8h ago
Stockholm, Swedish Capital
57
45m ago
Hisoka??
143
2h ago
giddy mountainous Opossum
164
2h ago
used yoga pants
460
6h ago
New Erma comic
496
5h ago
good ol death
72
59m ago
About damn time
486
6h ago
Mars Curiosity
156
2h ago
He's been waiting for this moment
639
7h ago
Hungarian logic
496
5h ago
mean squealing Mouse
334
4h ago
David
137
1h ago
Climate change
176
2h ago
cuddly equable Seahorse
283
4h ago
awful clammy Cattle
268
4h ago
tiresome entertaining depressed Dolphin
387
4h ago
puny majestic Rail
704
7h ago
Bloodthirsty Party
150
2h ago
1997 CYOA
38
1h ago