Interesting. The wording is rather vague though... - #97237437 added by teamrocketninja at Burnt By Conan

Reply -2 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Fun fact I just found out: Jesus said some people are are born gay, and it's not a choice.

Spread the love fellow junkers.

#40 to #11 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Prove it fool. Tell us where.

#41 to #40 - calawesome

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

It has to do with a mistranslation about 'Eunuchs'. Jesus speaks about the three types of Eunuch, one being the Eunuch who chooses to be so for God, ie Priests and such, the Eunuch forced to be, ie those castrated, and the Eunuch born. Many think it has to do with men born without testicles, but it avtually has to do with the fact that in ancient hebrew, Eunuch was used to describe effeminate and those less 'masculine' than others, ie gays.

#43 to #41 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Can you find the actual passage? Id be interested in reading it.

#44 to #43 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I can give you a link to the page where it's discussed?

#46 to #44 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Please do.

#47 to #46 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

did you get it?

#48 to #47 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Uh... I dont think so? Can you just post it here?

#49 to #48 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

www.wouldjesusdiscriminate.org/biblical_evidence/born_gay.html

I tried to message you with it.

#51 to #49 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Interesting. The wording is rather vague though...

#52 to #51 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

but that IS what it says, doesn't it?

#53 to #52 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

It only says that some are born eunuchs though. I just dont like that vagueness... Leaves it open to different interpretations.

#54 to #53 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I don't see how that's vague. Some people are born straight, some are born gay.

#55 to #54 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Im not arguing that. But it doesnt say clearly if its a reference to homosexuality. Its an interesting possibility, I'll give you that.

#56 to #55 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I suppose, but if you look at the fact that this is translated from hebrew, I think you have to look at their use of the word to interpret it.

#58 to #56 - teamrocketninja

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I agree, we'd need to read Hebrew.

#59 to #58 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

a **** load of stuff in the bible makes more sense when read with the hebrew wording in mind.

#60 to #59 - teamrocketninja

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

It would be interesting to read it that way.

#35 to #11 - welfarekid

Reply -1 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

B... but, jesus said.

#22 to #11 - pubictears

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#42 to #22 - anon id: 03d4c00f

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

It was actually stated in court that In God we trust is more patriotic than religious.

#26 to #22 - pubictears

+1 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#36 to #26 - Eggdoodle

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I get your point, you're just coming off as a rude nob tho

#23 to #22 - welfarekid

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

In god we trust is on the money in your pocket.

#25 to #23 - citruslord

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

That just shows how hypocritical our nation really is. One of the main principles it was founded on was religious freedom and separation of church and state.

#28 to #25 - pubictears

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#33 to #28 - citruslord

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

That's what I said. It means that you have a right to practice any religion privately, but when it comes to political matters, Religion should be completely left out, because it leads to inequality for certain groups.

#31 to #28 - pubictears

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#13 to #11 - icewraith

0 123456789123345869

has deleted their comment [-]

#27 to #13 - citruslord

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I'm sure back in the civil rights movement alot of people felt suffocated with the amount of coverage the issue got. It's what it takes to change something that so many people feel strongly about and the government controlling over it is extremely biased in one direction.

#24 to #13 - sirnigga

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

i agree equal treatment people dont suffocate others with straight **** just do whatever

#14 to #13 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

I'm Catholic, and I recently found out that Jesus said some people are made gay.

#29 to #14 - citruslord

Reply +1 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Really, I don't think it matters to disprove these arguments. The people that come up with stuff like "it's a choice" and "It will lead to bestiality" are scared and pulling stuff out of their asses.

#30 to #29 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

That's true, but I still think it gives a wrong view of Christians and Catholics because the ones who pull **** out their ass are always the most vocal about it.

#32 to #30 - citruslord

Reply +2 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

Yeah, it always seems that the worst of a group gets the most publicity. Take bronies for example.

#34 to #32 - calawesome

Reply 0 123456789123345869

(07/12/2013) [-]

This dude gets it.