Burnt By Conan. . Televangelist Pat Robertson said that he wishes Facebook had a "vomit button" he could push whenever someone posts a picture of a gay couple k funny
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (61)
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#3 - spermanentthreat
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
I know a gay person, who is always posting some naked guys making out. After like 5 of these pictures I commented something like "Dude, please stop posting things like this, its a bit disturbing" because those pics were like always the first thing that popped up when opening facebook. And his response was: "Why? Becuase you hate gays? I'm proud of what I am and you can't stop me"    
And all I could do was agreeing like "yes, that's pretty cool keep going"   
   
MFW   
   
   
I am totally okay with homosexuals. I got plenty of gay friends. But that doesn't mean that I like to stare at naked gayguys!
I know a gay person, who is always posting some naked guys making out. After like 5 of these pictures I commented something like "Dude, please stop posting things like this, its a bit disturbing" because those pics were like always the first thing that popped up when opening facebook. And his response was: "Why? Becuase you hate gays? I'm proud of what I am and you can't stop me"
And all I could do was agreeing like "yes, that's pretty cool keep going"

MFW


I am totally okay with homosexuals. I got plenty of gay friends. But that doesn't mean that I like to stare at naked gayguys!
User avatar #9 to #3 - mutzaki
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
What if the situation was a lesbian posting a bunch of girl on girl pics? Would you feel uncomfortable then? What if a straight girl commented on it, saying "please stop posting this"? Would you care?
User avatar #16 to #9 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Some people are comfortable with certain things, it doesn't make them a hypocrite. I personally wouldn't mind seeing either. If you don't mind me asking, what's your sexuality?
User avatar #17 to #16 - mutzaki
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I'm straight.
User avatar #57 to #17 - heartlessrobot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
You'd be ok with seeing naked chicks, but you probably wouldn't be ok with naked furry chicks. (Bad example if you're a furry)
User avatar #61 to #57 - mutzaki
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
My main point is really that you should either just ignore it or unfriend people like that. Like, I understand not wanting to see naked guys if you're a straight guy, but at the same time, if some sensitive girl was all over a friend for posting a bunch of pictures of half-nude women, I'd feel they were being ridiculous.
#12 to #9 - anon id: 2eb23a26
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
If it was constantly to prove a point about how they were proud about being lesbian, you're damn ******* right I would care. One of my closest friends is lesbian, doesn't mean I wanna see them ************* preaching their **** about.
#18 to #3 - anon id: 5a9bba45
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
you could also just... you know... hide his stories from your wall...
#37 to #3 - nunubot
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Sexual orientation isn't something to be ashamed or proud off.
Sexual orientation isn't something to be ashamed or proud off.
User avatar #45 to #3 - sliferzpwns
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Simply post lesbian smut upon his wall, any retaliation must be met with swift and befuddled accusational judgement.
#50 to #45 - newforomador
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Let's give him some material.
#19 to #3 - foreveraloneninja
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
That's when ypu just say 'No I don't hate people due to their sexual preference but I do not share the same preference but I am respectful enough of other people to not constantly post naked. So I would hope you would respect others aswell by not posting pictures of naked men.'
#20 to #19 - foreveraloneninja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
naked chicks*
#10 to #3 - adamks
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
You mostly enjoy staring at naked heterosexual guys.
#15 to #10 - heterosexual
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
so do i
User avatar #11 - calawesome
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Fun fact I just found out: Jesus said some people are are born gay, and it's not a choice.

Spread the love fellow junkers.
User avatar #35 to #11 - welfarekid
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
B... but, jesus said.
#13 to #11 - icewraith
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #27 to #13 - citruslord
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I'm sure back in the civil rights movement alot of people felt suffocated with the amount of coverage the issue got. It's what it takes to change something that so many people feel strongly about and the government controlling over it is extremely biased in one direction.
User avatar #24 to #13 - sirnigga
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
i agree equal treatment people dont suffocate others with straight **** just do whatever
User avatar #14 to #13 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I'm Catholic, and I recently found out that Jesus said some people are made gay.
User avatar #29 to #14 - citruslord
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Really, I don't think it matters to disprove these arguments. The people that come up with stuff like "it's a choice" and "It will lead to bestiality" are scared and pulling stuff out of their asses.
User avatar #30 to #29 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
That's true, but I still think it gives a wrong view of Christians and Catholics because the ones who pull **** out their ass are always the most vocal about it.
User avatar #32 to #30 - citruslord
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Yeah, it always seems that the worst of a group gets the most publicity. Take bronies for example.
User avatar #34 to #32 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
This dude gets it.
#22 to #11 - pubictears
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Or you could leave the ******* bible out of it all together. Why should a book written hundreds of years ago in a country worlds a part from your own dictate who a person can and cannot love. I thought America was ran by a secular government.

Obviously not.



“Religious institutions that use government power in support of themselves and force their views on persons of other faiths, or of no faith, undermine all our civil rights. Moreover, state support of an established religion tends to make the clergy unresponsive to their own people, and leads to corruption within religion itself. Erecting the 'wall of separation between church and state,' therefore, is absolutely essential in a free society.”
― Thomas Jefferson
#26 to #22 - pubictears
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
By disliking this you are pissing all over your First Amendment.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof."

Is a British person really talking to an American on the importance of your constitutional rights?
#36 to #26 - Eggdoodle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I get your point, you're just coming off as a rude nob tho
#42 to #22 - anon id: 03d4c00f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
It was actually stated in court that In God we trust is more patriotic than religious.
User avatar #23 to #22 - welfarekid
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
In god we trust is on the money in your pocket.
User avatar #25 to #23 - citruslord
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
That just shows how hypocritical our nation really is. One of the main principles it was founded on was religious freedom and separation of church and state.
#28 to #25 - pubictears
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
The right of religious freedom does not mean it has any place telling the government what they can and cannot do.
User avatar #33 to #28 - citruslord
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
That's what I said. It means that you have a right to practice any religion privately, but when it comes to political matters, Religion should be completely left out, because it leads to inequality for certain groups.
#31 to #28 - pubictears
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
In fact I am wrong. It has every right to tell the government what they should do. However separation of church and state just means the government does not have to listen.
User avatar #40 to #11 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Prove it fool. Tell us where.
User avatar #41 to #40 - calawesome
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
It has to do with a mistranslation about 'Eunuchs'. Jesus speaks about the three types of Eunuch, one being the Eunuch who chooses to be so for God, ie Priests and such, the Eunuch forced to be, ie those castrated, and the Eunuch born. Many think it has to do with men born without testicles, but it avtually has to do with the fact that in ancient hebrew, Eunuch was used to describe effeminate and those less 'masculine' than others, ie gays.
User avatar #43 to #41 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Can you find the actual passage? Id be interested in reading it.
User avatar #44 to #43 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I can give you a link to the page where it's discussed?
User avatar #46 to #44 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Please do.
User avatar #47 to #46 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
did you get it?
User avatar #48 to #47 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Uh... I dont think so? Can you just post it here?
User avatar #49 to #48 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
User avatar #51 to #49 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Interesting. The wording is rather vague though...
User avatar #52 to #51 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
but that IS what it says, doesn't it?
User avatar #53 to #52 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
It only says that some are born eunuchs though. I just dont like that vagueness... Leaves it open to different interpretations.
User avatar #54 to #53 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I don't see how that's vague. Some people are born straight, some are born gay.
User avatar #55 to #54 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Im not arguing that. But it doesnt say clearly if its a reference to homosexuality. Its an interesting possibility, I'll give you that.
User avatar #56 to #55 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I suppose, but if you look at the fact that this is translated from hebrew, I think you have to look at their use of the word to interpret it.
User avatar #58 to #56 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
I agree, we'd need to read Hebrew.
User avatar #59 to #58 - calawesome
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
a **** load of stuff in the bible makes more sense when read with the hebrew wording in mind.
User avatar #60 to #59 - teamrocketninja
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
It would be interesting to read it that way.
User avatar #7 - thewaronbeingcool
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
I dunno, I mean a vomit button sounds pretty cool.

Maybe not for what he had in mind, but I'd love to vomit at some people's stupidity.
#6 - bandoslootshare
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
#8 to #6 - clinomania
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Well I guess they got ROCK hard
User avatar #21 to #6 - thenewmaroi
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
He's got a ROCKin' body.
#1 - satnaam
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
**satnaam rolls 752**

At rob
User avatar #38 - llpanic
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
well that's pretty weird i never search for girls with duckface, cancerous memes or ****** pseudo poetic ******** in facebook and i always see it

i mean i have nothing against gay marriage but facebook doesnt work like that
#39 - teamrocketninja
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/12/2013) [-]
Nothing against gay rights, but I do find it kinda nasty seeing pics of dudes making out. Its just... I find it icky.   
   
And a vomit button would be quite useful on facebook.
Nothing against gay rights, but I do find it kinda nasty seeing pics of dudes making out. Its just... I find it icky.

And a vomit button would be quite useful on facebook.
User avatar #5 - ivoryhammer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
I wish Pat Robertson would just die already.
#4 - anon id: a71f4bca
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
That wasn't really a burn.. (and it kinda loses it's affect when your housands of miles away surrounded by your locing fans and the other person has no chance to respond)
#2 - anon id: 6a7ba388
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(07/11/2013) [-]
Implying you have to search facebook to see **** that pisses you off.
I'm fine with gay marriage, but still, the sheer stupidity of some people.