Mkay... I'm afraid we'll have to ask you to leave the internet. It is in the best interest of everybody. See, on the internet, nothing is serious. Except the people who don't belong on the internet. This post, my dear sir, was a joke.

Your services are no longer required. Please leave your Guy Fawkes mask at the door.

I don't see why you'd think this. But whatever floats your boat.

Lmao. If everyone didn't blatantly ignore the obvious inferences in conversation they would never need to use twisted logic, which, is really all about manipulating.

This applies to this post completely. A court order to give someone a car infers that the entire car must be given. You would never see a judge say that someone gets a car chassis, tires, engine, windows, seats, seatbelts, etc.. That is where your brains frontal lobes would do a bit of "problem solving" and would see the obvious inference.

The judge didn't state what condition the car must be given in, and until the date of having to hand over the vehicle it is rightfully yours as is everything inside of it. Whatever damage happens to the vehicle before it is no longer owned by you happens to your personal property, therefore this twisted logic holds up in court and shall be used if necessary. When dealing with divorce court there are thousands of different reason to use twisted logic, if the court case is running smoothly it's suggested to never initiate using twisted logic, however both men and women can be crazy when their emotions are running loose and that happens often in the case of divorce so twisted logic becomes not only necessary in most cases but it becomes a art form as well.

it would hold up with a decent enough lawyer, but they cost more than a decent amount of money.