Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - delphine (06/27/2013) [-]
As an artist, I took the liberty of looking up the artist's explanation of this piece, and translated it into terms so non-artists will understand.
<<<
#59 to #3 - CIS White Male (06/28/2013) [-]
lost it at ******** to english lol
User avatar #13 to #3 - ScottP ONLINE (06/28/2013) [-]
Most explanations that they give their "art" consists of "it has a more spiritual meaning and if you don't understand then you're not civilized enough"
User avatar #11 to #3 - hudis ONLINE (06/28/2013) [-]
As an artist, I don't think that's an unreasonable explanation. The mundanity of the two objects together does make for a disturbing, anxiety-inducing combination, which seems to be the desired effect.
User avatar #54 to #11 - rockamekishiko ONLINE (06/28/2013) [-]
but how the **** is that art?
User avatar #21 to #11 - spyrothehedgehog (06/28/2013) [-]
That may be true, but I personally think that there's not enough effort put into this for it to be in a museum
User avatar #24 to #21 - hudis ONLINE (06/28/2013) [-]
Art is never about effort, though, but I understand that different people have different opinions on that. Personally, I don't see anything extraordinary about a beautiful portrait or depiction of a battle from the 18th century - anyone with a bit of talent can learn to paint like that with enough 'effort' - but I can appreciate art with more subliminal and implied meaning. It's much more personal.
User avatar #68 to #24 - andiminius (06/28/2013) [-]
Dude, it's ******* hair on cheese. If you see more than that you must have paid much for what you're smoking. I understand the artist meant something deeper. But seriously? ******* hair on cheese. That ****** gross.
User avatar #76 to #68 - xbonezbreaker (06/28/2013) [-]
Not saying I don't agree with you, but I believe the point of it is so that you feel that it's gross
User avatar #27 to #24 - spyrothehedgehog (06/28/2013) [-]
Yeah, I can see what you mean. Art is for the artist
User avatar #144 to #27 - delphine (06/28/2013) [-]
News Flash: Art is for the artist, unless you want to actually make a living making art. Then art is for your clients and if you want to make a living you need to create things that people will actually want to purchase and display. Not many people want to buy a hairy cheese to display on their mantle.
User avatar #165 to #144 - toosexyforyou (06/28/2013) [-]
You can't speak on other people's behalves when making an argument.
User avatar #4 to #3 - delphine (06/27/2013) [-]
I hate conceptual art. I hate it so, so much.
 Friends (0)