Derp. . FEMINISM : AND Ill THIS SCENE, WE AGAIN SEE ADMEN BEING DEPRESSED ,. to be fair back in those days a guy would beat his wife in front of the kid eating cereal and not giving a Derp FEMINISM : AND Ill THIS SCENE WE AGAIN SEE ADMEN BEING DEPRESSED to be fair back in those days a guy would beat his wife front of the kid eating cereal and not giving
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (57)
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#4 - lauryn **User deleted account**
+52 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#13 to #4 - anon id: a9bbb135
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
oh you, naughty gurl
#14 to #4 - anon id: 0a1da2b1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
**** you bitch
#16 to #4 - anon id: d6f0f8f9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
not allowed to study or read and completely reliable on the grace of their husbands, for everything. Practically no civil rights.
I bet stupid bitches back then were having the time of their lives as the *************** they were.
User avatar #38 to #4 - stijnverheye
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
You like basements ?
User avatar #5 to #4 - theincorrigibleone
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
I would be willing to pay for you to come to my house so I could oppress you all day, every day.
#7 to #5 - angelmitskano
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
I can smell the desperation.
I can smell the desperation.
User avatar #6 to #5 - mattseven
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Oppress me, you dirty slut ;D
#15 - anon id: d6f0f8f9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
kids still doing the feminism jokes? guess its a good way to compensate the fact that youre never going to be loved in your life because most girls see you as the shallow boy that you are.
#25 to #15 - jinapayne
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
More like let's play the white knight who is hoping to get laid from that comment
#22 to #15 - arziben
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
spotted the feminist
spotted the feminist
User avatar #17 to #15 - thewinkster
Reply +40 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
lets play spot the feminist.
#20 to #17 - willcutting
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Spotted !
Spotted !
User avatar #9 - herecomesjohnny
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
to be fair back in those days a guy would beat his wife in front of the kid eating cereal and not giving a ****
#18 to #9 - anon id: 13401d3a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
You must come from a pretty weird dinasty.
User avatar #10 - zaperzero
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
FEMINISM : AND Ill THIS SCENE, WE AGAIN SEE ADMEN BEING
DEPRESSED ,

...I just can't even...DJ 4DM1N, why are you being derpesed here?
#12 to #10 - largeheadphones
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
That's what im thinking, poor DJ 4DM1N, please get better soon, here's a picture of Hitler with boobs to help you through this difficult time.
#19 to #12 - nephritho
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #53 to #19 - largeheadphones
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Yes...
#21 - toxinajg
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
did you know that Hitler, Stalin and all other dictators combined could not produce the amount of evilness and stupidity that feminists produce in one second?
User avatar #23 to #21 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Eh, there's feminists and there's 'feminists'. There are decent feminists out there who are actually doing good, petitioning the government for certain rights or heading charities, but then there's bitchy, air head whining feminists who loud mouth the world and make all their work for naught.
#56 to #23 - anon id: 146d7b38
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/29/2013) [-]
We need new words, because now feminism mean two different things....And it's confusing.

Besides, feminism is a stupid word....It's just a slight alteration fo the ford feminine, and being feminine has nothing to do with having a vagina.
User avatar #57 to #56 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/30/2013) [-]
Feel free to send your complaint to Merriam-Webster.
#24 to #23 - jinapayne
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
But even good feminists believe in the patriarchy and their goal is to lift women's rights up to men's instead of trying to raise and lower both
User avatar #26 to #24 - thirdjess
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
As far as I can tell, their main goal is to preserve women's basic rights. Eg: Their right to abort. Or in less fortunate countries, their right to read or write. That sort of thing.
#27 to #26 - jinapayne
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
But most feminists dont even try to help less fortunate countries. And they think abortion is ONLY the woman's rights, as if the father has no say.
User avatar #28 to #27 - thirdjess
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
I believe that too. It's her body, if she doesn't want to carry a baby to term then that's her choice. It's more than simply having a baby, it's taking all that time off of work to take care of the child, putting their life aside and likely not being able to return to the place they were. For the first six months or so, it is unhealthy for the father to have the major roll in caring for the child.

If the father had a say in it, easily the result could be a business focused woman stuck in a house caring for a child she doesn't want, because the court told her she had to. That's not fair on anyone in the situation.
#29 to #28 - jinapayne
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Yeah, Im pro-choice, but if people want anti-abortion, they might as well let the government provide the mom with some money. But some pro-lifers are like "nooo"
User avatar #31 to #29 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
We have that in Australia. I think the colloquial term is 'baby bonus', but I think that only applies if they qualify for other financial aid.
#33 to #31 - jinapayne
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
But also are you saying if the father had a say in it, it would turn out horribly? That's what feminists believe though, men shouldn't have a say in it because they would make the wrong decisions
User avatar #35 to #33 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
I'm saying it has the opportunity to go horribly, and given the opportunity it will do so. I'd hazard a guess that 98% of the time, things would go smoothly; but pricks do exist. They'll abuse the power, and sometimes that abuse will be rewarded.
#37 to #35 - jinapayne
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
But bitches exist too and it could go wrongly if it was just the woman choosing
User avatar #41 to #37 - thirdjess
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
So sign the damn form! You have the option to just throw your hands in the air and walk away, women don't. That's what I'm saying. We can't sign a form that says "**** you, you can have the baby." We can't walk away and men can, you get it? Because we are the ones carrying the child, we are the ones who have the choice. We don't force fatherhood on you but you have the opportunity to force motherhood onto us, given this scenario were true.
User avatar #30 to #28 - thebannedzombie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
So instead the father has no say in the matter and will be forced to pay child support for a child he didn't really want even though the courts will probably award sole custody to the mother regardless of what a useless piece of **** she might be.
User avatar #32 to #30 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Oh I had it backwards. I suppose it would have to go both ways, though. I'm fairly sure that there's a thing you can sign saying you don't want anything to do with a child and you will never try to contact them, so you don't have to pay support.. so if you really do not want a child, there's always that. But I mean, it's fatherhood, you know? While the prospect of it might be terrifying and life changing now, when that little fella is five or six and asking you about your favourite games, it's something you'll regret missing out on.
#34 to #32 - jinapayne
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
A lot of men aren't ready for children or just simply dont want children
User avatar #36 to #34 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
So then sign the waver and be done with it. As I said, once you're little older and all your friends have mini-me's following them around with tonka trucks, you'll wish you had access to your kid.
User avatar #40 to #36 - thebannedzombie
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Right, the non existent "waiver" that you pulled out of your ass. Does that come with a free Ferrari or is that the the "i don't want to pay taxes" form?
User avatar #42 to #40 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
It does exist, or at least here it does. ******* google it or some ****, iunno.
User avatar #43 to #42 - thebannedzombie
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
The voluntary agreement has to be signed by both the mother and the father, otherwise the CSA just uses their little formula and takes it whether you want them to or not. If the mother doesn't want to sign it, he is **** out of luck.

Next time you should actually check before spewing **** out of your mouth.
#45 to #43 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
"This waiver that you pulled out of your ass" Yea, next time you should check before spewing **** out of your mouth.
"This waiver that you pulled out of your ass" Yea, next time you should check before spewing **** out of your mouth.
User avatar #48 to #45 - thebannedzombie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
The waiver you described doesn't exist. Thus you did pull it out of your ass. If the mother has to agree to the voluntary agreement, the father still has no choice in the matter while the mother just automatically gets the payments unless she decides she doesn't want them.

Seriously here, how ******* dense can you get?
User avatar #39 to #32 - thebannedzombie
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
That only works if the mother agrees to it. In the vast majority of cases the father has to pay child support while the mother gets custody. If the mother lies about being on birth control, pokes holes in your condoms, or jerks you off and uses a turkey baster shove your sperm into herself, it has no effect on the decisions of the courts.

There are documented cases of male rape victims being forced to pay child support (and custody is still often awarded to the female rapist in these cases).

It's utter ******** and the fact that you just tried to defend it with a statement beginning with "I'm fairly sure" means you have no idea what the **** you are talking about. If the father doesn't want the child, there is no "choice" in the matter, he just gets ****** by the court system and raped in the ass by the mother.

And your absurd, and utterly pathetic argument goes both ways. "But I mean, it's motherhood, you know? While the prospect of it might be terrifying and life changing now, when that little girl is five or six and asking you about your favorite makeup, it's something you'll regret missing out on."

How ******* dense can you get?
User avatar #44 to #39 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Hey *********, how's about we stop red thumbing the girl trying to have an intelligent discussion, mk?

Obviously this situation is uneven on both sides and that is why it is changing. Again I say that having a child takes a lot more out of a woman's life. For example, I am a graphic designer. Some day I would like to have a design firm and have people working under me. I don't think I would want to have kids and draw away time from that goal until I had achieved it. I would literally have to just have to put that on hold for YEARS, and likely give it up all together; where as the father can continue doin what his doin and visit the child occasionally.

As I said in a previous comment, when there is an opportunity for something to go horribly wrong, it will go horribly wrong but this is not the majority; of course thjere are crazy bitches out there with turkey ******* basters but that's probably like 1000 cases worldwide. I'm not a feminist, I'm not whining about how unfair it all is, I'm not gas-bagging at a guy for daring to oppress me, I just think that prochoice is the right choice- and even so your ******** is really starting to piss me off.
User avatar #46 to #44 - thebannedzombie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Your "intelligent discussion" is arguments based off of "I'm fairly sure" and absurdly sexist statements about how men should just automatically step into the fatherly role just because you think they might regret it later. Those were your only two arguments justifying why men don't deserve a choice in a matter. How the hell can you call that an intelligent discussion?
User avatar #47 to #46 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
As opposed to your side which is "Bitches con my bros with fake birth control."

I say I'm fairly sure and it's variation almost every sentence. Look at my ******* writing. It's littered with 'I think's, 'I suppose's and so on. It's called a non-committal speaking style.
User avatar #50 to #47 - thebannedzombie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Also, you have yet to ask me to provide sources for court rulings for the cases where the women won child support even in cases where they lied or forced the men to contribute their sperm. Women have robbed sperm banks and the "fathers" have still been forced to pay child support. My argument has nothing to do with "bitches con my bros" and everything to do with the courts supporting those bitches and throwing my "bros" to the curb with child support payments to a child they can never see.
User avatar #51 to #50 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
It's a non-committal speaking style, as in it is a style of writing. That does not mean that I am not committed to my point of view. Just like if someone says 'Um' a lot when they talk, does not necessarily mean they are an idiot.

You're one of those people that thinks the world is out to get him, aren't you? I'm betting you think this NSA ordeal is terrifying because the government is going to set you up at any moment!

The form does exist because contrary to your belief, most people aren't insane. Most people, if asked to sign the ******* form, will. I sure as **** would, because I'm one of the rare and illustrious 'decent human beings'. I said it is a form you can sign and that permits you to walk away from a child and that is exactly what it is.

Women abusing the system is still a very rare occurance. As it is with all systems, people abusing it does happen but successfully doing so is rare. ****, people abusing a casino by using a counting system is an example of that. There is literally a country with a population of one. Don't you think if that abuse of the system could be easily done, there would be more people doing that to avoid taxes and such?
User avatar #52 to #51 - thebannedzombie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
lmgtfy.com/?q=%22noncommittal+speaking+style%22
No results found
And while yes you are free to talk and type that way, even if you make up your own name for the style, it really detracts from the point you are trying to make.

No, I don't do anything illegal and so I have no reason to care. If commenting on the failings of many countries child support systems becomes illegal, then I would probably have a problem with it.

You said it did exist, and it does not. Most people aren't serial killers, but it is still illegal. Most laws exist to counteract the deviant members of society who do immoral things, and the fact that your magical form requires consent of the mother even in a case where the "father" was raped is absurd.

Women abusing the child support system is not even close to being a rare occurrence because the entire point of the child support system is to force people who don't want to pay for a child they aren't allowed to live with to pay money to the parent who got to keep the child. The VAST majority of these cases award custody to the mother and demand payments of the father. So unless you are about to tell me that women are more qualified to care for a child and are unable to work and make money of their own, the system is broken and sexist. Also, after the moment of conception, voluntary or not the mother is the only one who has any choice.

The mother can conceive the child with or without the consent of the father, though forcing this results in minor legal repercussions which do not impact her eligibility for custody. The mother is the only one with any say during the pregnancy, and she is the only one with any choice regarding child support once the baby is born.
User avatar #54 to #52 - thirdjess
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
And you called me dense? Yes, the entire point of the child support system is to get men to pay child support. Number one: so many of those cases are from preexisting children. As in, they were married, they had kids, and then they decided they didn't want to be married anymore. Number two: What I was saying is that there are not a whole bunch of woman out there planning to rob a sperm bank. When those women do rob a sperm bank, I'd say most of them get shut the **** down. But again, it is a ******* system to be abused; I really do not know how many more times I can say that.

Think of it this way. Is stays the way it is. Crazy women force men to pay up, so they have one extra thing to pay for. Oh deary me, less cornchips. Or, men do have power the power to force women to have a child, oh deary me, there goes my life. I honestly do not even see how this is a problem. The court aren't that ******* stupid, they do this **** professionally; yes, sometimes that one judge was an asshole or that other dude totally fell for that chicks puppy dog eyes but for gods sake most of the god damn time they do the right thing because that is what they're paid to do. They're paid to look upon a situation objectively and make an informed decision thus. Women have conned men into child support, lets reference my previous number of 1000 turkey basters worldwide. How many do you think have a) not gotten away with it and b) didn't ******* do that in the first place. So many. So god damned many.

Now if you don't entirely ******* mind, I am seriously irritated, tired and going to bed. Good god damned night.
User avatar #49 to #47 - thebannedzombie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
If you aren't committed to your argument, why should I take it seriously?
User avatar #55 to #39 - flemsdfer
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Yes, courts do get their heads up their asses when it comes to custody, BUT A) you can't cut a baby out of a woman against her will. You don't get a say in abortion just like any woman can't make you get a vasectomy. B) Fathers can't just abandon unwanted children that easily because if it WAS that easy there would be far too many unsupported children in the world. Use protection, and don't sleep with loose women that are crazy enough to do that ****.
User avatar #11 - thedumbledore
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Then he could go back and beat the **** out of her if he liked and it would be acceptable.

I can't tell if you are a troll or not, will all this 'effect of feminism' ******** content you put out.
User avatar #1 - charpentier
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(06/26/2013) [-]
Taking a picture out of context to make your point? Isn't that the kind of things feminists do?
User avatar #2 to #1 - teranin [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/26/2013) [-]
it's a joke, guy
User avatar #3 to #2 - charpentier
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/26/2013) [-]
I know. I'm just saying.
#8 - anon id: 6895c893
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
In this scene the men are being equally oppressed.