Why is this allowed to continue. . Circumcision Double Standard It' s those They are Muslim men. They disgusting are pigs wha animals. The want women tn wemen d Why is this allowed to continue Circumcision Double Standard It' s those They are Muslim men disgusting pigs wha animals The want women tn wemen d
Upload
Login or register

Why is this allowed to continue

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
Circumcision Double Standard
It' s those They are
Muslim men. They disgusting
are pigs wha animals. The
want women tn wemen dcn' t
leek a certain even have a
I can' t believe
these barbaric
Muslims and their
female genital
mutilation
I' ll definitely Well, duh! Absolutely!
I' d never gs
my sens when I dicks near a In
have children WJI' JEE ‘Fagin t
circumcised
...
0
Views: 1294 Submitted: 06/25/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (29)
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #1 - dagyo
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Circumcision removes extra skin that could lead to medical conditions.

Muslims remove the clitoris for no medical reason. It's done to lower sexual desire.

They are not the same thing.
User avatar #2 to #1 - snowshark
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Yeah... this, pretty much.
User avatar #3 to #1 - teranin [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
The foreskin contains a tremendous amount of nerve endings, and can permanently damage the genitals with it's removal at a young age. It is also a religious practice that has it's origins in judaism, and was primarily used to prevent masturbation in children and reduce sexual pleasure. It is the exact same thing.
#7 to #3 - darakremen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Actually the clitoris contains more nerve endings than the foreskin.
And the process of female circumcision is often done in a much more savage way. _ " It may take place in a hospital, but is usually performed without anaesthesia by a traditional circumciser using a knife, razor or scissors."_
.
To make female and male circumcisions equal you would have to cut off the glans of the penis with a pair of scissors without anaesthesia.
#8 to #7 - teranin [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
they may not be completely equal as to the degree of damage, but the fact is they are both mutilations performed on children that originate from religious drive to reduce sexual pleasure, and both should generate disgust in the populace and be banned as a routine practice.  The USA is the only non-theocratic country that still performs circumscisions with any regularity, and it's time we caught the **** up on basic human rights.
they may not be completely equal as to the degree of damage, but the fact is they are both mutilations performed on children that originate from religious drive to reduce sexual pleasure, and both should generate disgust in the populace and be banned as a routine practice. The USA is the only non-theocratic country that still performs circumscisions with any regularity, and it's time we caught the **** up on basic human rights.
#27 to #8 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
why the **** do you have thumbs down? this world is ****** up mange lol
User avatar #4 to #3 - dagyo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
It's called female genital MUTILATION for a reason. Normally, when the procedure is performed, the child is 4 years old or older. It's performed by muslims, making it a religious practice, done to lower desire and the chances of "infidelity". No anesthesia is used. In some cases everything but a hole for urination and menstruation is removed. This practice causes SEVERAL health problems for the woman later in life, including recurrent urinary and vaginal infections, chronic pain, infertility, fatal hemorrhaging, epidermoid cysts, and complications during childbirth.

Circumcisions are performed with anesthetic. Only the foreskin is removed. It's performed at a young age, normally before the first birthday, and while it is common with Judaism, it can also be a personal preference and have no ties to religion. Circumcisions also prevent medical conditions like urinary tract infections and lower the risk of penile cancer, HPV, STD's, and HIV.

THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING.
User avatar #6 to #4 - teranin [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
ALL of the information you presented on circumcision is incorrect EXCEPT the age of the baby. There is no evidence of a reduction of danger from circumcision of any of those diseases, and in fact the evidence points to uncircumcised men having better immunity to catching HIV. Furthermore, the damage done is permanent, regardless, and it is a mutilation of the genitals. You are cutting into and removing the flesh of the male genitals. They are the same thing.
User avatar #9 to #6 - dagyo
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
"Better immunity to catching HIV"?

Everything I have said has been proven. Read this article by the Mayo Health Clinic.

www.mayoclinic.com/health/circumcision/MY01023/DSECTION=why-its-done

Circumcision might have various health benefits, including:

Easier hygiene. Circumcision makes it simpler to wash the penis. Washing beneath the foreskin of an uncircumcised penis is generally easy, however.
Decreased risk of urinary tract infections. The overall risk of urinary tract infections in males is low, but these infections are more common in uncircumcised males. Severe infections early in life can lead to kidney problems later on.
Decreased risk of sexually transmitted infections. Circumcised men might have a lower risk of certain sexually transmitted infections, including HIV. Still, safe sexual practices remain essential.
Prevention of penile problems. Occasionally, the foreskin on an uncircumcised penis can be difficult or impossible to retract (phimosis). This can lead to inflammation of the foreskin or head of the penis.
Decreased risk of penile cancer. Although cancer of the penis is rare, it's less common in circumcised men. In addition, cervical cancer is less common in the female sexual partners of circumcised men.
User avatar #10 to #9 - dagyo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Oh, and from that article...

Circumcision doesn't affect fertility, nor is circumcision generally thought to enhance or detract from sexual pleasure for men or their partners.

THEY ARE NOT THE SAME THING
User avatar #12 to #10 - teranin [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
False, circumcision is the removal of around 10,000 nerve endings from the end of the penis, it does reduce sexual pleasure. Furthermore, both practices involve the cutting into and alteration of the genitals of either sex, without consent of the party being cut. Ethically they are the same, even if yes, you are right that female genital mutilation does have far worse overall effects.
User avatar #11 to #9 - teranin [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
and here is a paper countering those opinions, and the validity of the studies performed. www.4eric.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/MC.pdf

You shouldn't believe everything you read on the internet, a lot of scientific studies are performed under biased pretenses.
User avatar #13 to #11 - dagyo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I see your 2010 paper and I raise you a 2013 Study.


You need to login to view this link
User avatar #14 to #13 - teranin [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Let's operate on the premise that you're right about it reducing the risk of HIV, just for the sake of argument. Does that make using a knife on a baby's genitals to remove a portion of them, while they are a baby and are unable to make that choice, in some way NOT genital mutilation? Does that take away the effectiveness of a condom in preventing STDs, which can be worn regardless of foreskin? No, of course it doesn't. The fact is, either way, you are CHOPPING UP A BABY'S PENIS to please either a societal asthetic concern or a relgious one, and it is a practice that must stop being inflicted on those who cannot make the decision for themselves.
User avatar #15 to #14 - dagyo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
You're comparing removing extra skin (while anesthetized) that's not required, and frankly, not that common in today's society with completely gutting a vagina, removing all the pleasurable parts for a woman, using no anesthesia.

Arguments can be made that they are both done against the will of the child, however, seriously think about the repercussions. They're not the same. I didn't lose any sleep over missing my foreskin. My lack of foreskin hasn't given me any less pleasure. I was a baby, the procedure was painless, and I don't have any nightmares over it. I must admit, the whole thing was pretty pleasant for me and made my life easier because I don't have to have any extra cleaning in the shower.

Now, take a 4 year old girl. Imagine she has to have the procedure performed on her because her parents want to make sure she's not going to be unfaithful to her future husband. They cut out parts of her reproductive organs, without using anesthesia. Imagine the nightmares she'll have in the future.

You can't honestly think that these are the same. A little bit of foreskin vs. an entire vagina.
User avatar #16 to #15 - teranin [OP]
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I think that they are ethically the same, not functionally the same.
#17 to #16 - dagyo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I can see we're not going to agree, which I guess is the whole point of the internet.    
   
If you ever have the urge in the future, you can ask me about my wiener.
I can see we're not going to agree, which I guess is the whole point of the internet.

If you ever have the urge in the future, you can ask me about my wiener.
User avatar #18 to #17 - teranin [OP]
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I'm circumcised as well, I have all the knowledge I need about it.
#28 to #16 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
WUT DA HELL why are all the empathic and ethically aware people getting thumbed down so hard??! "dis world i leave it" -hubert farnsworth
User avatar #5 to #3 - AmekoHakujin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
You're right, though you're getting red thumbs; Funnyjunk.
#22 - sxxxxxxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I never even knew what foreskin was until this last year or so. I just assumed that's what it was supposed to look like. I don't remember ****, and honestly, it sounds weird to me. Having a second layer that you have to pull back? ...ok.
I never even knew what foreskin was until this last year or so. I just assumed that's what it was supposed to look like. I don't remember ****, and honestly, it sounds weird to me. Having a second layer that you have to pull back? ...ok.
#23 to #22 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
imagine that the extra layer acts like protection for your sense of feeling. you can get off on ******* anything, **** is cash!

also dont gimme ******** about it not being true cause ive tried both worlds when i actually got incredibly calloused skin on my dick because of a reason i later discovered was using some sort of intense hair repair shampoo as bodywash.. lost around 50% of feeling on the tip cause i got guitar finger dick lel (anyone who plays guitar will know the difficulty of picking their nose with the chord hand cause of loss of sensation due to calluses)

tldr: having experienced both having foreskin is ******* awesome.
#29 to #23 - sxxxxxxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
Huh. While that does sound cool, doesn't that also mean that you wouldn't last as long? With a higher sense of feeling, it seems like it would make everything feel better, bringing you to orgasm faster. Also, I absolutely know what you mean by guitar finger.
#20 - anon id: 08d499ce
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
I have foreskin. My mother was one of the good ones. She understands that it is mutilation and could never inflict such an amazing amount of pain on a little, tiny, baby. Regardless of "oh he wont remember it, just chop it off!"

My beautiful mother has the kindness and empathy to leave me UNCUT. I love her for it. Girls cant even tell the difference either, as long as you're always rock hard before the action gets started. There is almost ZERO difference between an uncircumcised ERECT penis and a circumcised ERECT penis.

At least, this is how I have avoided uncomfortable moments. It helps to not like blowjobs either, I think it's an uncut thing.
User avatar #21 to #20 - Crusader
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Except, y'know, the fact that due to your extra sensitivity you won't last as long.
#25 to #21 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
believe it or not its actually easy to last long enough to give the woman an orgasm, even easier if you make her go topside. and if its been a while since your last time, just clean the pipes before the act lol.
#24 to #20 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
yeah like the penis is so god damn sensitive when uncut lol ******* teeth man.
#19 - anon id: 4da4d89d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/25/2013) [-]
Although I'm not a fan of male circumcision (you're messing with a healthy body, without that persons actual consent and without any proof it actually helps), you can't say male and female circumcision are the same. Circumcised guys can still get pleasure from sex etc, while a woman without a clitoris will have difficulties having pleasure for sex. Circumcised males wil often feel no pain in their later life. Women, however, can still feel the pain brought on by circumcision while going to the bathroom etc.
#26 to #19 - anon id: 3bd944c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/27/2013) [-]
THEY CUT THE CLITORIS OFF??!!? I THOUGHT IT WAS JUST THE DANGLY BITS :<<<<<