fuck you dc. . How can they kiss with all that destruction around? Booboo!!!! Shawarma" Hehehehehehehe. <<<<<<Where's his movie??
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

fuck you dc

How can they kiss with
all that destruction
around? Booboo!!!!
Shawarma"
Hehehehehehehe
...
+1193
Views: 48274
Favorited: 71
Submitted: 06/24/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to epicisthefun E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(221):

[ 221 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - anonymous (06/24/2013) [+] (14 replies)
they were both terrible movies
#4 to #3 - outerfiend ONLINE (06/24/2013) [-]
#48 - moonseye (06/24/2013) [+] (17 replies)
<<<<<<Where's his ******* movie??
#12 - anonymous (06/24/2013) [+] (44 replies)
most of marvel fans never picked up a comic in their life, they base their opinions on the movies alone,

dont get me wrong if you are a marvel fan and proud and read the comics, i salute you.

but these retards who never heard of iron man untill his 2008 movie and now think he's the ******* best even tho he had one good movie (which was the avengers)

avengers was ******* amazing and now these asshole think marvel **** on everybody cause of one good movie, when in retrospect most marvel movies are a pile of wank,

I love marvel, i love dc, but dc is the original of all comics, superman is the worlds first hero who inspired the great writers to make great heroes we have today, give dc the respect it deserves you ungrateful peace of **** , because if there was no dc to start this all off, there would be no marvel,
#15 - fcrocker (06/24/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Fun Fact: The reason Chris Evans is holding his hand over his face in this scene, is that he was holding on a prosthetic that covered up his beard which he had to grow for another role.
#168 - Yojimbo (06/25/2013) [+] (2 replies)
When it comes down to DC vs. Marvel films, Marvel will always make more money/ be more successful with it's films. It comes down to two very separate styles, and two very different corporate entities behind the films.   
   
DC is going for a more serious approach, dramas with a plot, some action, and a need to be taken seriously by adults. They are past an age of &quot;campy&quot; films like Batman Forever. They see comic books as more than cartoons, but as serious writing, with dark storylines and meaning behind character's existence.   
   
Marvel on the other hand is going for a more light-hearted approach.  The plots to their movies may be weak, but they make up for it with star power, lots of injected humor, and fun action. They see comic books as colorful and sometimes laughable cartoons with memorable characters.   
   
All that being said, Marvel has the Disney juggernaut backing it, so it will always be able to afford more advertising/ get more appeal out to it's intended audience. In addition, although I am a die hard Batman fan, I think Avengers took the right approach. I believe more people like to laugh than to cry, so to speak. A lighthearted film will always be more appealing than a drama when it comes to comic book movies anyhow   
   
Just my two cents
When it comes down to DC vs. Marvel films, Marvel will always make more money/ be more successful with it's films. It comes down to two very separate styles, and two very different corporate entities behind the films.

DC is going for a more serious approach, dramas with a plot, some action, and a need to be taken seriously by adults. They are past an age of "campy" films like Batman Forever. They see comic books as more than cartoons, but as serious writing, with dark storylines and meaning behind character's existence.

Marvel on the other hand is going for a more light-hearted approach. The plots to their movies may be weak, but they make up for it with star power, lots of injected humor, and fun action. They see comic books as colorful and sometimes laughable cartoons with memorable characters.

All that being said, Marvel has the Disney juggernaut backing it, so it will always be able to afford more advertising/ get more appeal out to it's intended audience. In addition, although I am a die hard Batman fan, I think Avengers took the right approach. I believe more people like to laugh than to cry, so to speak. A lighthearted film will always be more appealing than a drama when it comes to comic book movies anyhow

Just my two cents
#141 - Cambro (06/25/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Marvel's goal is to bring back comic books for the younger ages. Thus why they are making a monopoly of movies in the same universe. They want a young fan base and build off of it while still keeping the adults involved with some adult concepts and jokes that kids wouldn't really understand. They are reviving the superhero for the kids.

DC's movie goal is to reimagine superheroes in a realistic light that can be grasped by adults primarily and relates to the modern day culture and themes. The Batman films were dark and gritty, but the trilogy as a whole stood as "be a hero no matter the circumstances" with linings of hope. It even dismisses the 'greater good' idea that this society had been holding. If Batman saved Ra's, Talia and Bane would never have sought revenge on him and Gotham. If Gordon and Batman had not chosen to lie about Dent, the Bane situation would have been alleviated a bit with less initial support from the people of Gotham. it even goes farther back. Batman is a symbol of justice and hope. Killing is always wrong because it muddies the image. The image of a hero never dies (thus Gordon Levitt being implied as taking up the cowl at the end of TDKR).

Man of Steel does the same: you do right no matter what. Even if someone deserves less than good treatment, you do the right thing. Not only does Superman imply "do not harm," it advocates for supererogatory actions, going above and beyond the call of action like a true hero. Killing, even when it is absolutely necessary, is to be mourned as a loss of life like the end of the film. Yet again we have visions of hope in this DC movie. DC has taken the noble effort against post-modern society and art, saying being good is not meaningless and bringing back the idea of hope. The era of Watchmen is over, we are in a more Golden Age again, though with necessary grit.
User avatar #86 - iwanttousenumbers (06/24/2013) [+] (9 replies)
Shawarma is pretty good
User avatar #80 - mjjrussell **User deleted account** (06/24/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Too be fair. The shawarma eating was after the battle. The kiss happened before the final battle with Zod
User avatar #83 to #80 - demandsgayversion (06/24/2013) [-]
In all appearances he was dead at that time. And he just stopped the world from being destroyed, he earned that kiss. Same with the Shwarma. You save the world, you can do whatever the **** you want afterwards. If humans honored the wookie life debt - as we all should - they would own their respective Earths.
#124 - TheSchwartz (06/25/2013) [+] (6 replies)
To be fair, the Avengers were actually trying to contain the destruction of the invasion. The total damage of the war with Loki resulted in approximately $160 billion. Plus, Loki was captured alive.

Superman, on the other hand, did not make any attempt to contain the city's destruction, resulted in $2 trillion in damages, about 129,000 dead, 250,000 missing, over 1 million injured, and deliberately killed General Zod. Even Mark Waid nearly stormed out of the theater after that gem.

So on one hand, there's the Avengers saying, "Yeah! We just saved a city and minimized damages incurred! Let's have Shawarma!" While Superman is all "Hey, I just saved the city, but caused as much damage as the nuking of Nagasaki, only with more deaths, way more injuries, and a hell if a lot more monetary damages. Kiss me!"

Sauce: www.firstshowing.net/2013/discuss-zack-snyders-new-superman-and-death-in-man-of-steel/
#26 - jinapayne (06/24/2013) [+] (8 replies)
I also think now is a good time to do a little rant/review on Man of Steel
I feel like Im the only one that think Man of Steel is incredibly overrated
Everyone is loving it because they think it is underrated because of the critics when actually it's getting so much love as being one of the best superhero movies
They think it is deep, because there is emotion and jesus metaphors, but it just looks deep because there is no lightheartedness in it. They try to be deep, but remember, this is a Snyder film. There are tons of logic holes in the film too. The main reason why DC fans are loving this is because it is the first Superman film with action, which is nice, but I want more. I want an interesting exciting story. They should of done something with the Phantom Zone a bit more like in the comics. So it isnt that great of a film, I liked it, but it's no Dark Knight
#73 - anonymous (06/24/2013) [+] (13 replies)
I think DC is 10x better not just in movies they make better video games better animated movies and their live action movies are pretty damn good
Watchme, Man of steel ,Dark Knight trilogy ,Green lantern (wasnt that bad) ,R.E.D ,V for vendetta ,Constantine ,arkham video games ,injustice ,dc universe online

and the dark knight returns part 1 and 2 and under the red hood are better than any live action superhero movie ever
#1 - eclecticparadigm **User deleted account** (06/24/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I guess if it wasn't Batman, Marvel would've monopolized super hero comic books.
I guess if it wasn't Batman, Marvel would've monopolized super hero comic books.
#14 to #1 - anonymous (06/24/2013) [-]
actually marvel didnt get popular untill the 60's,
even then dc where bigger,

just because they make more movies doesnt mean they have more or better heroes

personally i prefer dc,

when you look at it most of marvel heroes are rip offs, but what you expect dc was out first and made great heroes that inspired marvel
#56 - senorfrog (06/24/2013) [+] (4 replies)
This is off topic, but how can they make a Guardians of the Galaxy movie without Nova? Richard literally made the team possible (combining Starlord and Gamora and Drax, finding Knowhere, convinced Starlord to be Starlord again.) Just seems weird that they skip this important piece.
#21 - jinapayne (06/24/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Seems to be a lot of Marvel hate recently.
I like DC and I like Marvel but I prefer Marvel
DC fanboys think their movies are so deep and Marvel is just mindless action and that all Marvel fans are teen girls
I hate fanboys and fangirls of everything, they are either retarded or all they do is bitch
#6 - anonymous (06/24/2013) [+] (11 replies)
They are boh amazing movies,

deal with it

so sick of marvel fan boys comparing ****
User avatar #150 - Sethorein ONLINE (06/25/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Still can't bring myself to watch man of steel... blue/orange tint makes me nauseous... Every picture I've seen from it is either blue tint or orange tint...
#131 - bighairyfart (06/25/2013) [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #139 to #133 - orgodemir (06/25/2013) [-]
"Suddenly" decided?
#119 - TehFunnyMan (06/25/2013) [+] (4 replies)
People liked the Shwarma bit because it was a joke, and was genuinely funny.   
People (justifiably) despise the Man of Steel kiss because it was    
A). A completely forced conclusion to an unrealistic and boring romance subplot   
and    
B). The line that followed that 						********					 kiss was so goddamn 						*******					 terrible it gave me hives.
People liked the Shwarma bit because it was a joke, and was genuinely funny.
People (justifiably) despise the Man of Steel kiss because it was
A). A completely forced conclusion to an unrealistic and boring romance subplot
and
B). The line that followed that ******** kiss was so goddamn ******* terrible it gave me hives.

User avatar #75 - goodcheese (06/24/2013) [-]
shawarma is pretty delicious.....although so is amy adams...
#69 - mrmarc (06/24/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Aaand as usual, Stark's not giving a 						****
Aaand as usual, Stark's not giving a ****
#138 to #69 - darknesking (06/25/2013) [-]
A Stark kinda giving a **** .
[ 221 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)