high playing mario bros. . in PIXELS or nun us:. So when I see a blurry image... the universe has dropped into low resolution to allow for faster play?
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

high playing mario bros

in PIXELS or nun us:
...
+1073
Views: 49994
Favorited: 36
Submitted: 06/22/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to epicisthefun E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(90):

[ 90 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #95 - neoexdeath (06/23/2013) [-]
There's actually a theory that all we see is a hologram, and a group of scientists is currently, or was, I forget how old the idea is. Trying to find a loss of resolution in the universe.
0
#108 to #95 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
0
#106 to #95 - lieutenantshitface **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#91 - pikininja (06/23/2013) [-]
Never thought of it that way.
#87 - snaresinger (06/23/2013) [-]
Wrong. Planck units are the pixels of real life. Maybe you've heard the term "quantum leap"- that actually refers to discontinuity in motion and matter. And there is indeed a theory that we ARE in a simulation, and Planck units ARE our pixels. Since we can create simulations and things like artificial intelligences, there's no reason we couldn't be in one, or in an Inception-style situation. This is hinted at by the fact that we have things like universal pixellation and universal limits to things like speed and temperature. So, yeah. Everything you know is likely wrong.

inb4 "you must be lots of fun at parties"
User avatar #85 - chuckbillrow (06/23/2013) [-]
if atoms are the pixels of life explain subatomic partials like electrons and bozons and quarks
User avatar #86 to #85 - trollgiggity (06/23/2013) [-]
The colours that make up to pixel?
#84 - ethaniscool ONLINE (06/23/2013) [-]
I at to be the one to say this but the realization guy would have been a better use of this
#83 - nigganinja (06/23/2013) [-]
www.youtube.com/watch?v=y-4_1ZnJHvQ

a new way to get all lol champs for free!
Christ I thought they would never make something like this, thank god, ******* love Aatrox though
#81 - anonymous (06/23/2013) [-]
Actually that would be the String Theory.

>inb4 it hasn't been proven. It's a Theory
#78 - anonymous (06/23/2013) [-]
9gag?
User avatar #73 - namesboo (06/23/2013) [-]
I feel sorry for the person playing my life.... 10/10 like skyrim with masterbation
#72 - hellbourne (06/23/2013) [-]
If thats the case then this game has a pretty ******* nice resolution
User avatar #45 - garentei (06/23/2013) [-]
I had thought of that at the age of 10
+21
#35 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#92 to #35 - cramperzombie (06/23/2013) [-]
The fat **** looking into the camera ruined this meme for everyone.
User avatar #67 to #35 - rapsuskiller (06/23/2013) [-]
Both are ecually well used with this caption: 10Guy is all about high moments and highdeas (like this one could be a highdea)
The sudden realization guy is used for, you know, realizations, as this one
-2
#75 to #67 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#77 to #75 - rapsuskiller (06/23/2013) [-]
Oh 						****					 me, I don´t know the names to all the 						*******					 memes ever invented. I should really know my meme, right? How can I be so stupid to not know the name to every 						*******					 meme?
Oh **** me, I don´t know the names to all the ******* memes ever invented. I should really know my meme, right? How can I be so stupid to not know the name to every ******* meme?
0
#101 to #77 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #110 to #101 - rapsuskiller (06/24/2013) [-]
U r 1 cheeky **** m8
0
#112 to #110 - absolutnignog **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #113 to #112 - rapsuskiller (06/24/2013) [-]
Man, not everything has to be perfect, you know? Right, I didn´t use the exact name of the meme and you ******* understood what I was saying. Yous because you are a fussy bitch, that is not pretext to force the WHOLE ******* WORLD to use perfect vocaboulary. Douche
User avatar #34 - tarekmig (06/23/2013) [-]
If there was no 9fag there weren't those awesome memes!
User avatar #23 - InglushMayjur (06/23/2013) [-]
Why the **** don't I realize things like that when I'm high? No, instead, I ask titillating questions such as "What if Australia was us?"
#21 - EventHorizon (06/23/2013) [-]
Here's a mental titty twister for you: What is the smallest unit of time? Time is a dimension, just like our three spatial ones. We believe that the string is the smallest unit in the 1st-3rd dimension, as you cannot get any smaller. But what about time? For example, when you heat up your oven, the temperature doesn't just smoothly flow from one temperature to the next. The heating elements actually exchange packets of energy in the form of heat known as Quanta (this discovery by Max Planck solved one of thermodynamics biggest problems of theoretical infinite heating). So if you were to look at a 1,000,000,000x zoomed in view of the heating graph of an oven, the temperature would be increasing in discrete steps, like a terraced hillside. So the question is, if we know that there is a size limit to every other type of energy and mass, then what is the smallest single unit of discrete time?
Here's a mental titty twister for you: What is the smallest unit of time? Time is a dimension, just like our three spatial ones. We believe that the string is the smallest unit in the 1st-3rd dimension, as you cannot get any smaller. But what about time? For example, when you heat up your oven, the temperature doesn't just smoothly flow from one temperature to the next. The heating elements actually exchange packets of energy in the form of heat known as Quanta (this discovery by Max Planck solved one of thermodynamics biggest problems of theoretical infinite heating). So if you were to look at a 1,000,000,000x zoomed in view of the heating graph of an oven, the temperature would be increasing in discrete steps, like a terraced hillside. So the question is, if we know that there is a size limit to every other type of energy and mass, then what is the smallest single unit of discrete time?
User avatar #80 to #21 - ofmiceandmen (06/23/2013) [-]
The smallest unit of time would be the time it takes light to travel 1 planck length.
User avatar #107 to #80 - EventHorizon (06/24/2013) [-]
Bingo
User avatar #36 to #21 - newforomador (06/23/2013) [-]
That is nearly impossible to find because time is completely relative to perspective. When closer to an object of large mass time goes slower (or faster, I forget which), and the same goes for different speeds. If you were to be traveling at the speed of light, time would come to nearly a stand-still (or the opposite, once again, I forget). However, even the other dimensions can be relative to perspective, since, at the speed of light, one of the three dimensions (width I believe) completely disappears. All of this is theoretical however, so this could all be false.
User avatar #93 to #36 - obese (06/23/2013) [-]
There is no such thing as time. It is all an illusion. You create yourself and time itself is relative to what you perceive. The past doesn't exist, the present is dying and the future is life.
User avatar #97 to #93 - newforomador (06/23/2013) [-]
Once you start talking about things like that it can become really weird. I start thinking about things like how all of us could see different colors but call them the same name just because thats how we know it. Like, I see object A as red, when you see it as what I would call green. Or how time could be moving at a different speed for all of us but we would be used to time going at that speed so it wouldn't be abnormal, even if your time was moving at 1/10th the speed of my time. My god I love **** like this but it can be so confusing sometimes.
User avatar #99 to #97 - obese (06/23/2013) [-]
Beautifully said.
User avatar #89 to #36 - snaresinger (06/23/2013) [-]
Or perhaps that's not what he was asking, but it's what came to my mind
User avatar #88 to #36 - snaresinger (06/23/2013) [-]
That's not what he's asking though. He's saying, why is our universe discrete? Why isn't it continuous? And since it seems to be discrete, what happens in between the gaps? Things don't actually move- they "teleport" in a huge number of quantum leaps. So what happens between quanta, and why? I personally think it's very likely that we're in a simulation.
User avatar #22 to #21 - EventHorizon (06/23/2013) [-]
I actually gave you a hint up there for those actually interested.
User avatar #38 to #22 - bthebigoldb **User deleted account** (06/23/2013) [-]
Hmm... is it a planck time? (This question is stupid.)
User avatar #40 to #38 - EventHorizon (06/23/2013) [-]
Most people don't know, and there's no such thing as a stupid question. Being an egotistical prick is pretty stupid though...
User avatar #42 to #40 - bthebigoldb **User deleted account** (06/23/2013) [-]
Yeah, it's stupid if you know the answer. You're like the kid in class who asks questions when he already knows the answer. If you really wanted people to know then you should have just told them. Also just so you know scientists don't agree that the planck length or planck time are the smallest possible lengths. So you're wrong anyways. IF M-Theory is correct then yeah, but it has no experimental evidence.
User avatar #46 to #42 - EventHorizon (06/23/2013) [-]
One, I was asking for the benefit of everyone else. Of course I knew the answer, I wanted other people to think about it though. Two, I'm not "wrong anyways" because it has been neither proven nor disproven. You, on the other hand, are like the kid in class who lashes out at people for no good reason.
User avatar #20 - namnori (06/23/2013) [-]
Sudden clarity Clarence would work better
#19 - capnwetnipples (06/23/2013) [-]
This image has expired
[ 90 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)