| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Channels |
| User Rankings |
#18 to #7
-
2scared2login (06/17/2013) [-]
that movie sucks donkey *** , some dirty ******* jews and gypsies are the good guys and hitler gets shot down at a cinema. historicaly incorrect too. Then there is that blond chick who is married to a ******* ****** . A ******* ****** . I dont know about you guys but race mixing is disgusting and hollywood should not use that as propaganda. And then we have Django unchained that is about a ****** who hates his rightfully owner. The ****** and his friend WHO IS WHITE then kills other whites, only because the white guy wants the ****** to go free. ******* disgusting. The movie ends to a white genocide and the ****** and his friends wins. That ******* quentin ************ tarrantino should be hanged for his betrayal against his white bretheren.
#120 to #18
-
halor (06/17/2013) [-] when you said the movie sucked i was obliged to agree with you as it was as i thought it was being marketed as an action comedy,i was sorely disappointed in how unfunny it was (funniest part with Hitler screaming nein wasn't even in the damn movie) and the overall lack of action that occurred (most of it seemed to occur at either the very beginning with the bear jew or very end when they were in Paris getting ready for their attack on the theater/attacking the theater)...also why the hell was half the movie from the perspective of a random jewish girl with a movie theater
#29 to #18
-
toughactintinactin (06/17/2013) [-] Are you the same anon who was going on about how all Arabs are terrorists?
#133 to #128
-
fourthusername (06/17/2013) [-]
You do have a point but that is a hugely debatable statement. ****** (in Canada at least) is defined as a culpable killing of another person. "culpable" means "to blame" (in case you didn't know) and whether a soldier killing another soldier is culpable is an interesting topic.
Literally, of course, the soldier is to blame for the killing of the other soldier. It was the soldier who shot the gun and the it was likely intentional and premeditated.
On the other hand, self defence is not considered "culpable" in law and if the other soldier has a gun this could come into play.
Back to the self defence point, the killing of unarmed soldiers (such as this scene) is illegal under the Geneva Convention. That being said, the United States (who the Bear Jew represents) does not follow the Geneva Convention. This means the United States does not consider this killing to be a ****** but other countries would.
You have inadvertently brought up a pretty good topic and I get really ******* bored over the summer.
Literally, of course, the soldier is to blame for the killing of the other soldier. It was the soldier who shot the gun and the it was likely intentional and premeditated.
On the other hand, self defence is not considered "culpable" in law and if the other soldier has a gun this could come into play.
Back to the self defence point, the killing of unarmed soldiers (such as this scene) is illegal under the Geneva Convention. That being said, the United States (who the Bear Jew represents) does not follow the Geneva Convention. This means the United States does not consider this killing to be a ****** but other countries would.
You have inadvertently brought up a pretty good topic and I get really ******* bored over the summer.
#137 to #133
-
thechurchchurch (06/17/2013) [-] The united states does follow the geneva convention,it just leaves open provisions that allow the people of the united states to still have a vote because the usa doesnt subscribe to international law that denies the citizens of the us a vote. Many countries have similar provisions.
the geneva conventions were also not adopted until 1949,after the germans on the western front were all wiped out.
Also during this point of the movie the bastards were a covert operation team deep within enemy lines,there was no reason or battle strategy in taking prisoners as they would have only been detrimental to their mission. When you're behind enemy lines you dont have to take prisoners,or at least practically it would be ridiculous.
the geneva conventions were also not adopted until 1949,after the germans on the western front were all wiped out.
Also during this point of the movie the bastards were a covert operation team deep within enemy lines,there was no reason or battle strategy in taking prisoners as they would have only been detrimental to their mission. When you're behind enemy lines you dont have to take prisoners,or at least practically it would be ridiculous.
