Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#110 - SubjectThree (06/14/2013) [-]
What about bows and arrows? They have several advantages over guns.

*Genuinely silent, and leave no smoke cloud.
*Can penetrate most commercial issued body armors because arrowheads cut and slice, and can go through the holes in a kevlar weave with ease.
*Can be poisoned
*Cheaper than guns
*Modern carbon-fiber arrow shafts cannot be broken off without risk of further damage to the victim.

Why aren't we banning these then?
User avatar #129 to #110 - ltsparky (06/15/2013) [-]
They weren't mentioned in the Constitution
User avatar #124 to #110 - jorah (06/15/2013) [-]
Because they are useless for mass killing
User avatar #112 to #110 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
Because how many mass shootings can you name that have been done with a bow and arrow? As interesting as that would be to witness...
User avatar #126 to #112 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
have you played Crysis 3?
User avatar #127 to #126 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
I have not. Although, I obviously should...
User avatar #128 to #127 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
quite its basically arrow after arrow
#111 to #110 - 4chan refugee (06/14/2013) [-]
thats more of a assasination weapon than a self defence weapon
 Friends (0)