Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#110 - SubjectThree (06/14/2013) [-]
What about bows and arrows? They have several advantages over guns.

*Genuinely silent, and leave no smoke cloud.
*Can penetrate most commercial issued body armors because arrowheads cut and slice, and can go through the holes in a kevlar weave with ease.
*Can be poisoned
*Cheaper than guns
*Modern carbon-fiber arrow shafts cannot be broken off without risk of further damage to the victim.

Why aren't we banning these then?
User avatar #129 to #110 - ltsparky (06/15/2013) [-]
They weren't mentioned in the Constitution
User avatar #124 to #110 - jorah (06/15/2013) [-]
Because they are useless for mass killing
User avatar #112 to #110 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
Because how many mass shootings can you name that have been done with a bow and arrow? As interesting as that would be to witness...
User avatar #126 to #112 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
have you played Crysis 3?
User avatar #127 to #126 - secretdestroyers (06/15/2013) [-]
I have not. Although, I obviously should...
User avatar #128 to #127 - captainsheperd (06/15/2013) [-]
quite its basically arrow after arrow
#111 to #110 - anonymous (06/14/2013) [-]
thats more of a assasination weapon than a self defence weapon
 Friends (0)