Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #12 - Hyoukin
Reply +67 123456789123345869
(06/13/2013) [-]
This is a raging femnazi.

The feminist movement is about EQUALITY. Not proving one better than the other, not trying to rise higher than each other, but being completely equal.

Crazy ass femnazis like this cunt do not speak for the feminist movement.
#178 to #12 - anon id: e0ca1f91
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I think we found the feminist
#125 to #12 - anon id: 40be1dd3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Then why call yourself a femenist and not a humanitarianist?
#99 to #12 - anon id: 2874a4b6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
>Achieving gender equality by focusing solely on the issues of one gender.

Nah bro. Feminist theory requires you to believe in 'the patriarchy', which is absolute delusional horse ****.

Both genders have equality issues, you wanna focus on both? Join humanism you cunt.
User avatar #54 to #12 - baconfattie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
They should change the name in today's society to "Equilitarian" or.. "Gender Equiality" or whatever you want. But not feminisim.
User avatar #47 to #12 - gammajk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
>equal rights
>has "fem" in the name
>"equal" nowhere in sight

Why call yourself a feminist? Why not equalist or humanitarian or similar?
User avatar #29 to #12 - daIRONman
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I agree with you wholeheartedly, however, I never understood the point of Feminism. It would make more sense if they were "equal rights activists," but instead, they're "feminists."

Feminism in itself is the belief that both sexes can be equal by focusing on the problems of one gender. I would feel so much better if feminist focused on the whole picture, instead of half of it.
#64 to #29 - qwertywtf
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
well the whole point of feminism was back when it was guaranteed that men had better rights than women. therefore, the movement was focused on women because while "everyone having equal rights" was part of it, it was largely "women are oppressed (because they were) so we want the same rights as men". Even though they for the most part do have the same rights, people still support it because of perpetuation of oppressive stereotypes, which ironically are pointed out by feminists, which makes them the reason anyone pays attention to stereotypes. Also what bugs me is the whole "70 cents for every dollar a man gets". Last I checked minimum wage was the baseline, and servers at restaurants are usually women, so you get tips which allows you to make more money.
Anywho, my point is that feminism was good at its induction, but has overstayed its welcome.
User avatar #185 to #64 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Okay but think about it, even back then, men got in way more trouble punching a woman than punching a man. So yeah...
User avatar #46 to #29 - zaggystirdust
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
pretty much what you said.

To create a group that focuses on gender equality then naming it "feminism" really defeats the purpose.

that's like saying "Let's create a group that focuses on equality for all races, we'll call it 'white people'"

I just call women who are like the one in the content feminists and the one's who actually make a difference "equal rights activists" like you stated