Shrek? is that you?. . I want to sage" a man (tten to a bloody pulp witll it highchool sh aired in h is morth, like scrapple in .. of a pig." Andrea Twerkin It' Shrek? is that you? I want to sage" a man (tten bloody pulp witll it highchool sh aired in h morth like scrapple of pig " Andrea Twerkin It'
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (198)
[ 198 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #14 - galacticboner
Reply +154 123456789123345869
(06/13/2013) [-]
Too bad this is not a feminist. It's a fat ugly woman who got rejected her whole life and build a raging hate for men.
User avatar #181 to #14 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Sounds like every active feminist to me.
#183 to #14 - thorwald
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
She had a husband, he had beaten her during their relationship and burned her with cigarettes and knocking her out by pushing her head against the wall.
I hate feminists, men and women are different, period. I kinda get why she's angry, although she's generalising men...
The things I hate most is women punching a man and then saying that the man can't punch back because she's a girl...wut
My opinion(not that anybody gives a ****):Women who can act like a man can take a punch like a man
User avatar #196 to #183 - galacticboner
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
You really need to get your facts straight about feminism.
User avatar #110 to #14 - ilikebuttsex
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I thought that was jaba the Hutt
#111 to #14 - recio **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #28 to #14 - teranin [OP]
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
She is Andrea Dworkin, one of the best known and most well respected feminists of our time.
User avatar #51 to #14 - brettyoke
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I'm missing your point.
User avatar #12 - Hyoukin
Reply +67 123456789123345869
(06/13/2013) [-]
This is a raging femnazi.

The feminist movement is about EQUALITY. Not proving one better than the other, not trying to rise higher than each other, but being completely equal.

Crazy ass femnazis like this cunt do not speak for the feminist movement.
User avatar #47 to #12 - gammajk
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
>equal rights
>has "fem" in the name
>"equal" nowhere in sight

Why call yourself a feminist? Why not equalist or humanitarian or similar?
User avatar #54 to #12 - baconfattie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
They should change the name in today's society to "Equilitarian" or.. "Gender Equiality" or whatever you want. But not feminisim.
#99 to #12 - anon id: 2874a4b6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
>Feminism
>Achieving gender equality by focusing solely on the issues of one gender.

Nah bro. Feminist theory requires you to believe in 'the patriarchy', which is absolute delusional horse ****.

Both genders have equality issues, you wanna focus on both? Join humanism you cunt.
#125 to #12 - anon id: 40be1dd3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Then why call yourself a femenist and not a humanitarianist?
#178 to #12 - anon id: e0ca1f91
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I think we found the feminist
User avatar #29 to #12 - daIRONman
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I agree with you wholeheartedly, however, I never understood the point of Feminism. It would make more sense if they were "equal rights activists," but instead, they're "feminists."

Feminism in itself is the belief that both sexes can be equal by focusing on the problems of one gender. I would feel so much better if feminist focused on the whole picture, instead of half of it.
#64 to #29 - qwertywtf
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
well the whole point of feminism was back when it was guaranteed that men had better rights than women. therefore, the movement was focused on women because while "everyone having equal rights" was part of it, it was largely "women are oppressed (because they were) so we want the same rights as men". Even though they for the most part do have the same rights, people still support it because of perpetuation of oppressive stereotypes, which ironically are pointed out by feminists, which makes them the reason anyone pays attention to stereotypes. Also what bugs me is the whole "70 cents for every dollar a man gets". Last I checked minimum wage was the baseline, and servers at restaurants are usually women, so you get tips which allows you to make more money.
Anywho, my point is that feminism was good at its induction, but has overstayed its welcome.
User avatar #185 to #64 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Okay but think about it, even back then, men got in way more trouble punching a woman than punching a man. So yeah...
User avatar #46 to #29 - zaggystirdust
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
pretty much what you said.

To create a group that focuses on gender equality then naming it "feminism" really defeats the purpose.

that's like saying "Let's create a group that focuses on equality for all races, we'll call it 'white people'"

I just call women who are like the one in the content feminists and the one's who actually make a difference "equal rights activists" like you stated
#8 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+18 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#50 to #8 - orgrok
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#186 to #8 - anon id: 183931a2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
This has nothing to do with job pay and employment.

And it says right there there are quadruple the amount of male rapists with anger issues than with women. Which means four times the rape. Which means four times the potential for people to go to jail. Which means four times the potential prison population for that crime.

Man are abused because we go to jail more when we commit more crimes! DD:
^ You.
User avatar #202 to #8 - srskate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
third and fifth statistic are ****** too. The confounding variable is "What crime were they convicted of."

Fifth doesn't allow comparison to women, since 99.99% of all women are the mothers of the children they are pregnant with.
#169 to #8 - niggasinafrika
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Funny how the first graph left out victims of rape
#62 to #8 - qwertywtf
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
why is mustard part of the last link
User avatar #53 to #8 - srskate
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
You realize that second graph is ENTIRELY ****** up!

You forgot the confounding variable! There are more fatherless children than motherless. It skews the damn data.
User avatar #174 to #53 - KazumaKyu
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Oh, I'm sorry, is only one side allowed to skew data in their favor? Just one more thing men shouldn't be able to do, I guess.
User avatar #200 to #174 - srskate
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Do you realize how bad that is as a response?

Thats a 5 year olds response. We have proverbs to explain why that is such a bad response.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_make_a_right

We have a wikipedia page explaining why thats a bad response.
User avatar #203 to #200 - KazumaKyu
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/15/2013) [-]
... Maybe I should have put that in italics or something? I wasn't trying to argue with you or defend the image in question, I was attempting to give a typical response that an unthinking anti-feminist might make to the accusation of skewed data. I apparently failed spectacularly, though. /shame/

It was intended to be ironic, not... well, moronic. My apologies.
#204 to #203 - srskate
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/15/2013) [-]
Oh, my bad. I didn't interpret the sarcasm. In retrospect, I was a bit harsh anyway. Sorry about that man. Anyway, it's all good now, right man?
Oh, my bad. I didn't interpret the sarcasm. In retrospect, I was a bit harsh anyway. Sorry about that man. Anyway, it's all good now, right man?
User avatar #192 to #53 - toosexyforyou
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Okay dude, lets see your graph that shows how many more fatherless children than motherless there are in the world. You could've just made that up, where are your sources?
User avatar #199 to #192 - srskate
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
The first graph just said that women are more likely to get the children in divorce cases.
That isn't even accounting for the fact that men can run out on an unborn child. While women can run out, they can't necessarily do it until after the birth of the child.
so, numbers

Single fathers: 1.96 million: Number of single fathers in 2012; 16 percent of custodial single parents were men. You need to login to view this link

Single Mothers: 10.3 million The number of single mothers living with children younger than 18 in 2012 www.infoplease.com/spot/momcensus1.html#ixzz2WDNIafor
#9 to #8 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+32 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#10 to #9 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#11 to #10 - swiftykidd **User deleted account**
+10 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#148 to #11 - weenieandthebutt
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
#152 to #148 - weenieandthebutt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
#155 to #152 - weenieandthebutt
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
User avatar #91 to #9 - rhc
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
on the plus side, that is some beautiful penmanship.
#66 - Wumbologist
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Ok, just because a person who identifies themself under a certain movement doesn't mean that the movement is evil. Examples include...   
   
Stalin was a communist—clearly not all communists are evil, just him.   
Gaddafi was a Muslim—clearly not all Muslims are evil, just him.   
Urban II was a Christian, by all measures very devout since he ordered the first crusade—clearly not all Christians are evil, just him.   
And finally, not all women's rights activists are evil, just this miserable ******* cuntface.   
   
Every movement or ideology has people who are ******* and people who are not, and we shouldn't judge the movement by its most ******* proponents.
Ok, just because a person who identifies themself under a certain movement doesn't mean that the movement is evil. Examples include...

Stalin was a communist—clearly not all communists are evil, just him.
Gaddafi was a Muslim—clearly not all Muslims are evil, just him.
Urban II was a Christian, by all measures very devout since he ordered the first crusade—clearly not all Christians are evil, just him.
And finally, not all women's rights activists are evil, just this miserable ******* cuntface.

Every movement or ideology has people who are ******* and people who are not, and we shouldn't judge the movement by its most ******* proponents.
#71 to #66 - anon id: cea57b67
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Urban II was a helicopter used by the NYP you ignorant twat.
User avatar #78 to #71 - Wumbologist
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Well he was also a pope
Two things can have the same name
#113 to #78 - recio **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #161 to #66 - poniesnstuff
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
******* finaly, you go dude
User avatar #194 to #66 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
The difference is the amount of bad eggs we notice with that movement.
User avatar #190 to #66 - carsausage
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
WHY BECAUSE I RAP ABOUT REALITY!
LIKE ME AND MY GRANDMA DRINKIN' A...CUP OF TEA
There ain't no party like my grandma's tea party.
Hey! Ho!
User avatar #68 to #66 - blakekendrick
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Well said. A few rotten eggs don't spoil the whole bunch, or whatever.

On another note, I consider myself a feminist but I know a girl that is so over-the-top in-your-face about the fact that she is, it kind of makes me ashamed to say it sometimes because of the stigma associated with the word, all due to people like her.
User avatar #19 - notsoscotia
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Can we stop slapping the word feminism on sexism please?
#20 to #19 - lolabunny
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Don't worry, it's only misused by 14 year olds trying to earn their 'man card'.
#25 to #19 - teranin [OP]
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I'll stop mixing the two together when the actions of feminism stop equating to misandry.
#33 to #25 - anon id: e91258e6
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
But they don't! You can find crazies in every group! Are you personally being oppressed? Is anyone in your country, for that matter? Are the big bad women trying to take away your man toys? Move to a country like Saudi you cunt.
User avatar #52 - srskate
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Funnyjunk

Its not about hating women.
#153 to #52 - teranin [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Nope, and neither is this post.  It's about hating an ideology, namely feminism, and the negative impact it has on men's lives in the western world.  Women are awesome and are not what this post is about.
Nope, and neither is this post. It's about hating an ideology, namely feminism, and the negative impact it has on men's lives in the western world. Women are awesome and are not what this post is about.
User avatar #197 to #153 - srskate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
but here is the thing. This women isn't a feminist. This women was chosen specifically because she is an extremist, because some of the little 14 year olds on funnyjunk get upset because they've been rejected. Sure, this doesn't apply to all of funnyjunk, but its ridiculous for the ones it does apply to.
#198 to #197 - teranin [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Uh, no, I chose this quote because it's a prominent feminist activist who achieved much in her efforts to engineer female superiority, and she is representative of the sick truth of feminism, that it is not about equality but it is about standing women up above men, through litigation and social manipulation. But it is far from being negative to women.
User avatar #201 to #198 - srskate
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=feminazi

This women is the westboro baptist church of feminism.

She is to women's rights what Peta is to animal rights,


Here is what actual feminist do: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feminist_Majority_Foundation#Accomplishments
User avatar #195 to #52 - toosexyforyou
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Except almost every comment putting down feminazis also says that this woman is not a real feminist and that real feminists don't think like she does.
User avatar #92 - Ehwhat
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Christ, that's a woman?
User avatar #95 to #92 - oceanmist
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
No, thats a rare land-whale, indigenous to the drivethroughs of McDonalds.
#132 - thechosentroll
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
This image has expired
That's a woman? No, I'm not even cracking a joke right now. I genuinely thought that was a man until I found out it's about feminists. How is this even possible? It's not even about the body build. Even "her" facial features are manly.
#134 to #132 - lemleet
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
same here
#94 - marnammin
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I didn't know Bobby was a feminist
#80 - ohnotwoone
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Ok seriously can you shut the **** up about feminism. You've proven that you have no understanding of women or feminists at all.

Sincerely,
Someone who comes here to laugh not tear my hear out.
#105 to #80 - whippersnapper
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
All feminism is wrong feminism.
User avatar #114 to #105 - mysticana
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
How the hell can you put that statement forward?
#116 to #114 - whippersnapper
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
The genders are not equal. Ultimately equality is not desirable, productive or possible.
User avatar #118 to #116 - mysticana
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Is this a girl or guy I'm talking to? Because I don't understand how equality COULDN'T be a good thing to strive towards. That's like saying black equality shouldn't have happened, as it is discriminating against a person because of the way they are. Also, the 'productiveness' I don't see a point in, as I'm pretty certain a woman can work just as hard as a man. And if you're talking about the biological differences between men and women causing this rift in equality as females are meant to be caring etc. you're ignoring the fact those qualities are from being brought up that way, and have changed dramatically since the past.
User avatar #128 to #118 - phtholognyrrh
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
i agree with you, so long as we dont try to go back and fix every past inequality on our way to the future.
#124 to #118 - whippersnapper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
It is not at all like talking about the equality between races.

Women are superior at the the unconscious act of gestating children and at lactation to feed those children, in every other field of endeavor males are superior in capability and potential. Nothing can change this and no one should want to change it. There may be cases where talented females may equal mid level males or a extremely rare genius female can sit down on the bottom rung of the elite but in general and overall males are designed to be the dominant and active sex. The only equality that is real is potential lovability and healthy reproductive necessity.

In order for women to have the illusion of equality men must carry them and or handicap themselves. Women are designed to be helpers and mother and to make the world a sweeter, cuter more comfortable place, anything beyond this is just the pursuit of vanity and inefficient for society.

As for equal rights, as things are today in America women are given superior consideration under law. Even though there must always be different consideration given to women under law, the situation today is skewed toward injustice as part of social destabilization agenda. True legal equality would not be desirable to most western women, but it would be somewhat more fair to men.

In my eyes if woman tells me she is equal, I take it to mean she wants to be given an advantage, because if she was actually to be treated as a really little man and judged in the same light, very few women, especially women dumb enough to claim equality, would enjoy the result at all. Consider having the same expectations upon you as even a small man your size would have, and consider how you would be seen based purely upon your personality with no extra sugar given because of the girlish features. Consider also losing many of the legal advantages, in fact just think of yourself as a little man, if you insulted a guy and he whupped you, in the male world character not courts count
User avatar #135 to #124 - mysticana
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
As for women being there to make the world a 'sweeter, cuter place' I can't even try to comprehend an argument for you, because I now know it will be ignored.

And total equality is what many people want, I personally don't want to be paid a pound more than a man doing the same job with the same qualifications, with the same attitude towards the work. Also, if I've pissed off a girl or guy enough for them to want to physically assault me, I shouldn't and wouldn't hide behind the 'woman beater' excuse.
#141 to #135 - whippersnapper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Well, if you are willing to play fair and to earn your position in life then you are within your rights, but remember, men aren't even equal to each other, you don't just show up and get a trophy for participating, and you dont get to throw a hissy fit until people give in like some chicks try to do, if you want to be equal, really equal, not just told that you are to shut you up, you have to earn it. Some women are bigger and stronger and smarter than other women, that doesn't mean that the whole gender is equal to men, it just means that certain women are exceptional.

But I promise that nature doesn't care about what fads people get into or your ideas of 'equality', it only cares about what is efficient and needed, and nature, through your instincts (which are not and never will be 'obsolete'), will not let you feel totally satisfied until you do in fact become a helper, mother, sweetener and cutener (natural woman).

At least you didn't call me names, most quickly prove their inferiority by so doing. You take care.
User avatar #146 to #141 - mysticana
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
I agree with some of the points in your argument, but there are weak men as well as women. You name the stronger woman an 'exception' whilst a stronger man would be the norm, which does link back to survival, but in modern society I don't believe that pure strength is the most important factor in employment especially.

I personally have been indoctrinated enough to want to be a mother and a helper, but I know quite a few women who have absolutely no desire to aid others, or have any children.

I refrained from doing so, have a nice day.
#151 to #146 - whippersnapper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
Yes todays work force is not entirely about physical strength. The part about you wanting to be a mother and helper is not the indoctrination part, that is the nature part, the indoctrination part is the part that says otherwise and if you look closely at biology and history you will see it has always been that way. Those women who do not desire to follow their instincts are generally either underdeveloped so the instincts have not kicked in or they are just confident that if and when they want to take that road it will always be waiting there for them, which is a mistake many older modern women lament having made.

Have a nice day too.
User avatar #127 to #124 - phtholognyrrh
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
holy **** whipper snapper calm your damn tits for a second and get over being dumped by your ex and yelled at by your mom for a moment and just calm the **** down!
and just an fyi, female boxers can punch with more pounds of force than males per square unit of are (not sure what system they use where youre from) and if youre talking about design, most every creature on the planet is designed for the female to be bigger and stronger. human women may not be "stronger" but matriarchal societies tend to have longer living citizens, less wars, and more societal advances.
#136 to #127 - whippersnapper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
That is an assortment of lies. Female boxers cannot punch with even as much force as a man the same weight and height. Most mammals are patriarchal and the males are larger. Matriarchal societies are rare and weak and generally very primitive. Patriarchal societies have accounted for the survival of the human race and have produces the greatest achievements have the greatest longevity. Women, when unrestrained by the modesty which is their natural substitute for discretion, are the most violent selfish creatures on earth, fortunately they are too ineffectual to run their full course or else American women would have long ago destroyed the world.

As for my many ex girlfriends, I did most of the dumping, and my mother, she and I get along and chat online daily, and my wife and our girlfriend all get along just fine. Just because someone tells you something your indoctrination didnt want you to acknowledge doesnt mean that I am somehow dysfunctional.

People are taught to make fun of those who tell certain unpopular truths, when it comes to feminism, the reaction is generally to tell someone that they are either unattractive and or that something is wrong with their genitals.
#88 to #80 - anon id: 56717e1d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/14/2013) [-]
There are many types of feminist, this is the loudest, and most rage educing type so people are going to talk about it. I have more or less 3 categories i apply to feminist. Man-haters (Depicted above) self explanatory. The Double Negative, or the type that Likes chivalry or men treating them like they are delicate flowers and pays for ****, but who then turns around and complains when they get paid less for the same reasons they are treated better earlier. Then their are the Logical Feminist, they believe that humans as a general rule should be equal whenever possible, they pay for their half of dates, open doors if they arrive first and do not act demure but try to show themselves as rational thinking individuals. The first should be shot, but in return i offer any woman to be allowed to reciprocate should an equally chauvinistic male pop up. The second I've seen be both adorable and annoying in various degrees, they seem most common. The last can be annoying or frankly cool as ****