Personality. . I like van tumour mtt' Personality I like van tumour mtt'
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (196)
[ 196 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - Znoflats
Reply +93 123456789123345869
(06/03/2013) [-]
#11 - insaneflame
Reply +58 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
So are there any ugly girls with horrible personalities or it is you're either beautiful and are **** to people or ugly as **** and nice?
User avatar #111 to #11 - BubsyB
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
I know plenty of Ugly females with horrible personalities, still sort of nice but you wouldn't want to hang around them because they're ****** up.
User avatar #154 to #11 - lukasv
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
A coach of mine once told me: "If you want people to still like you, you can be mean or you can be ugly, but you can't be both."
User avatar #165 to #11 - Dap
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
I think the point was the picture says "Personalitits" lol..
User avatar #95 to #11 - meganinja
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
a lot of fat chicks are very entitled. Not being mean or anything, but a good percentage of fat chicks I know have a horrible personality.
User avatar #199 to #95 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/09/2013) [-]
A lot of fat chicks aren't just entitled, they think they are as attractive as every other chick. There is a girl in my college class who is the size of a blimp, and when her boyfriend cheated on her with a normal sized decent looking girl, she honestly believed she looked better then her.
#46 to #11 - Seority
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Anyone can look beautiful (to an extent). Beauty is an outward thing, that does take time and knowledge to accomplish. Same with personalities, accept it's inward.
Those who take time to look nice I think deserve it. Those who have gone through the ordeals to have a "good personality" deserve respect too.
#162 to #46 - anon id: 019eefdb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Dear God it looks like Selphie.
Inb4 that's racist
Asian people love golf
#116 to #11 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
+6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #198 to #116 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/09/2013) [-]
Many girls who come of as mean while fat and ugly are fighting a battle in their head that's not really happening.

example: "He thinks I'm gross and is looking down at me well I'll just blow him off then!" "Out of my way jerk, I'm in a hurry."
User avatar #14 to #11 - rocksteady
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Unfortunately very sexy women like the one above can go their whole lives without constructive criticism. This is know as "Being inside the bubble." and it can lead to an awful, offensive, undeveloped, and crude personality. The person in the bubble will never know though, their looks will prevent anyone from popping the bubble.
User avatar #94 to #14 - rieskimo
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Conversely people who grew up as "ugly" or "plain" did receive criticism/had to develop a personality in order to make friends. Then you have people like Aisha Tyler or Felicia Day who grew up dorky/homely and had to develop a personality and then also developed into hot awesome women.
#189 to #94 - anon id: 2c48e95e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
I grew up in the categories of ugly and plain and have been unable to form a personality because I was raised not being allowed to make friends. (extremely racist parents in a town with basically just us being white. I have successfully been able to make friends as an adult and am only slightly more awkward around black people than I am other people because of an irrational fear of them perceiving me as racist just for being white, which in itself makes me feel like I am racist and sad) So now I'm plain without any real personality besides what I've been able to leech off my acquaintances to appear normal. I'm fairly certain I'm a borderline sociopath because of it. If you ever find a plain looking person with no personality then they might just be a sociopath so it would be best to stay away from them.
User avatar #193 to #189 - rieskimo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/05/2013) [-]
Hey man, don't put too much stress on yourself. I know it's easy for me to say but it is really as simple as that. The hard part is finding peace in yourself. I was abused all throughout my childhood and that mixed with some extreme poverty lead me to be a very bitter and anti-social child. I didn't trust anybody and wouldn't let anybody in(I didn't even hug my mom) until I was well into my preteen years(I didn't make my first real friend until I was about 13). That awkward "what will everybody think" or "everybody is just going to make fun of me" feeling is really just what you are putting on you. So give yourself a break and become more reactive. Let loose and try and enjoy the people around you. Yeah, there are going to be assholes(there always are) but just think to yourself that they have to live with themselves and you don't. Personality is really just people knowing what they like and defining themselves as the person they want to be. Share your interests, people will respond to that. As for race, that's kind of a sticky situation for all of us and how we've been raised(some more than others). Don't let your family and your past dominate you, let you shine. People respond positively to you owning yourself. After you let yourself breath it's just a matter of finding propriety boundaries, you'll trip and fall just pick yourself back up again.

Good luck man.
#150 to #14 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #208 to #150 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
I took a snapshot of this conversation, and I'm going to show everyone in class so we can point and laugh at you.
#209 to #208 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #210 to #209 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
I love that I am going to a Sociology class to show this and you said that

_So how do we know this is Sociology well for starters this man had his findings published in a Sociology text book by John. J. Macionis, which is taught in a level 3000 Sociology med class, while his work nicknamed the looking glass pertaining to our little subject rewarded him the title of being one of the most influential Sociologists.
_

This is gonna be so awesome
#211 to #210 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #212 to #211 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
Oh and when meads work went from the theoretical approach to thestrictiral-functional approach it then had to go through the positivist sociology which of course breaks down into the sub evidence of empirical evidence and science. Which of course all of meads work did now making his old theories accepted as facts of human nature.

Keep going please, this is to awesome. You are wrong but you can't handle it mentally so your breaking down.
#213 to #212 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #214 to #213 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
Of course the book didn't say Oh, are you retarded? I was explaining the steps to how sociology gets moved from theory to human nature, its all there you can google it since I can tell you have no education on the matter.
#215 to #214 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #216 to #215 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
I have the book Society by John J, Macionis Which has a full explanation on the matter. I would be happy to teach you about this; however, first we need establish a few things, so I know you are actually absorbing this.

You need to say:

That this was retarded make-believe ******** - Not really, it even says in my psychology textbook that his theory is a psychological theory. Cute, you say "cute" when you've ran out of things to say and want to put down the other person.

That this is again some dumbass **** - For a start, your theory would be "basic psychology" Secondly, it's a theory because you have no way of proving this effectively, we just have to rely on your knowledge/past experiences.

Oh and that obviously you didnt read this in you imaginary text book - I've read about George Herbert Mead, his theory comes under the psychological category of behaviourism.

Do that and I will be happy to take the time to teach you the entire chapter on the matter if you like, don't and I realize you are just having a mental break down because you are wrong about something.
#217 to #216 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #218 to #217 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/11/2013) [-]
I have the book Society by John J, Macionis Which has a full explanation on the matter. I would be happy to teach you about this; however, first we need establish a few things, so I know you are actually absorbing this.

You need to say:

That this was retarded make-believe ******** - Not really, it even says in my psychology textbook that his theory is a psychological theory. Cute, you say "cute" when you've ran out of things to say and want to put down the other person.

That this is again some dumbass **** - For a start, your theory would be "basic psychology" Secondly, it's a theory because you have no way of proving this effectively, we just have to rely on your knowledge/past experiences.

Oh and that obviously you didnt read this in you imaginary text book - I've read about George Herbert Mead, his theory comes under the psychological category of behaviourism.

Do that and I will be happy to take the time to teach you the entire chapter on the matter if you like, don't and I realize you are just having a mental break down because you are wrong about something.
#219 to #218 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #220 to #219 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/12/2013) [-]
I have the book Society by John J, Macionis Which has a full explanation on the matter. I would be happy to teach you about this; however, first we need establish a few things, so I know you are actually absorbing this.

You need to say:

That this was retarded make-believe ******** - Not really, it even says in my psychology textbook that his theory is a psychological theory. Cute, you say "cute" when you've ran out of things to say and want to put down the other person.

That this is again some dumbass **** - For a start, your theory would be "basic psychology" Secondly, it's a theory because you have no way of proving this effectively, we just have to rely on your knowledge/past experiences.

Oh and that obviously you didnt read this in you imaginary text book - I've read about George Herbert Mead, his theory comes under the psychological category of behaviourism.

Do that and I will be happy to take the time to teach you the entire chapter on the matter if you like, don't and I realize you are just having a mental break down because you are wrong about something.
User avatar #197 to #150 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/09/2013) [-]
It's not a theory, it's basic Sociology.

I didn't say this happens to every attractive woman, but it does happen to some attractive women for the reasons listed above.
#201 to #197 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #207 to #201 - hahahahah
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
It's Sociology you dumbass.
User avatar #202 to #201 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
It's Sociology not Psychology you idiot.

It has already been proven effectively by George Herbert Mead's research.
#203 to #202 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #204 to #203 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
"For a start, your theory would be "basic psychology" "

Cute, you are ignoring that when you tried to correct someone with underlines and quotes, that you were dead wrong and looked stupid.

Mead had a theory but it is considered proven, its now taught as fact.
#205 to #204 - downtoabsolutezero **User deleted account**
-1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #206 to #205 - rocksteady
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/10/2013) [-]
Psychology pertains to the study of the human mind, whereas Sociology pertains to learning human behavior.

I love how wrong you are, and are making up text book quotes and nonsense to try to dig your way out of being so wrong, cute.

Common' admit it you never knew of mead until I said his name, then you just goggled him. Yeah, I know.

So how do we know this is Sociology well for starters this man had his findings published in a Sociology text book by John. J. Macionis, which is taught in a level 3000 Sociology med class, while his work nicknamed the looking glass pertaining to our little subject rewarded him the title of being one of the most influential Sociologists.

Sorry kiddo, but you're the "******* dumbass." I almost feel bad for you that you got this embarrassed.

Oh and when meads work went from the theoretical approach to thestrictiral-functional approach it then had to go through the positivist sociology which of course breaks down into the sub evidence of empirical evidence and science. Which of course all of meads work did now making his old theories accepted as facts of human nature.

Oh you sure take the "******* dumbass" award today. This is too fun little buddy.
#12 to #11 - itrinx
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
According to funnyjunk it is. But why would you trust someone who's only learning for what peoples or the internet says ?

Of course i get it, that's a joke. But by overusing it you're just giving yourself a reason to be a coward. Still not everyone, but some of us are like this.

Red thumbs if you like, so more people will see what i said.
#7 - xturboxx
Reply +51 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
#13 - itrinx
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Same girl but without makeup. Yes she's a banal girl that could give you a chance.
#25 to #13 - anon id: 4ae38542
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
yes, you can even make men pretty with makeup. we would be better off without it
User avatar #180 to #13 - thewhimsicalfox
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Ahh - but who is she?
User avatar #75 to #13 - nebuchadnezzaurus
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
But who is girl
User avatar #102 to #75 - PlasmaFace
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Claire Sinclair
#84 to #13 - voltwaffle
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #37 to #13 - Haiku
Reply +39 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
*Same girl but without makeup, shown in the most unflattering posture with a ridiculous look on her face and unkempt hair* We all look like ****.
#8 - angelmatvey
Reply +31 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Hehe boobies
Hehe boobies
#147 - gibroner
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#33 - konradkurze
Reply +24 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
kinda like the Ghost Whisperer from family guy
#83 - nimblewalrus
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(06/04/2013) [-]
And it's off to **** for me...
And it's off to **** for me...