Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#54 - xxxsonic fanxxx (05/30/2013) [-]
Are you Americans really THAT dumb? 1930... Highest wages possible... ???
Its not even funny anymore HOW good you are at lying to yourselves. Freedom,
Democracy, Economic Competitiveness xD xD xD
You have two political Parties which basically have the same Agenda and differ only in Opinions about minor, unimportant **** that gets inflated via Media so you dont have to worry about the Real problems of your Nation. And everybody who has not the same dumb Opinions as you is either called a Socialist or a Fascist (depends on which party you vote for) Its ridiculous that you even Consider yourself a free Nation. No wonder that the whole world hates you
#141 to #54 - xxxsonic fanxxx (05/30/2013) [-]
We don't like the rest of the world either so who gives a **** if they hate us?

But that's most likely because you guys are more self centered and retarded than us but refuse to believe it.
User avatar #139 to #54 - osimonmagus (05/30/2013) [-]
...1910-1920's. You know...right after America saved Europe for the first time? It was America's golden age. The date for Ford on this content is 'circa' 1930. In the 1920's the wages in America were at their highest, business was at it's highest, the southern cotton business was at its peak, the GDP was the best it had been since the boom after Thomas Jefferson rejected the central bank system in circa 1800.

You're ignorance proves that your young foreign teenage angst blindly makes you follow falsified American hate speech. Please, troll harder.
User avatar #112 to #54 - colegaleener (05/30/2013) [-]
are you serious?
#108 to #54 - Gewdaism (05/30/2013) [-]
I love how people who don't live in america always think they know it better than the people who do
#104 to #54 - kmichel (05/30/2013) [-]
I agree completely. The two parties are the same, and differ significantly only in their marketing. Having passion for the apparent differences between either is as silly as having passion for the differences between Coke and Pepsi when both contain a corrosive acid, cut with sugar, and bloated with gas analogous to these politicians. After the Women's League gave up power over the elections as a neutral party, and the Chairmen of the RNC and DNC took control, the two parties drafted unfair laws that have effectively prevented 3rd parties from ever having a chance to win an election.

The Women's League said this upon leaving, "The League of Women Voters is withdrawing sponsorship of the presidential debates...because the demands of the two campaign organizations would perpetrate a fraud on the American voter. It has become clear to us that the candidates' organizations aim to add debates to their list of campaign-trail charades devoid of substance, spontaneity and answers to tough questions"
User avatar #76 to #54 - inamerica (05/30/2013) [-]
There's so much freedom here I bump my shin on it every time I turn a corner!

In America!
User avatar #75 to #54 - salts (05/30/2013) [-]
all i read was an attempted troll you never made any actual points ....good job
User avatar #63 to #54 - defender (05/30/2013) [-]
Why do you care so much about what we do and how we run our country, sounds to me you are a closet american you act like you hate us but on the inside you want to be like us kinda like every other swinging dick that puts as much of there time and energy into mentioning the US. There are several political parties in the US its only Republicans and Democrats that get the most attention and votes hell I could of voted for myself the last election.
#60 to #54 - xxxsonic fanxxx (05/30/2013) [-]
We're free to leave but we don't.

We freely choose to subject ourselves to our country's laws.

I'd say we're free.

are you foreigners really that hateful towards a country? If it doesn't affect you stop caring. Especially if you don't actually live in this country, you don't have a say.
User avatar #56 to #54 - therealpokemon (05/30/2013) [-]
Log in and say it like a man you ******* pussy, don't be scared of people disagreeing you or you're no less of a faggot than the OP.
#57 to #56 - xxxsonic fanxxx (05/30/2013) [-]
I dont even have an account, *******
#68 to #57 - ratchkae (05/30/2013) [-]
make one, pussy.
User avatar #58 to #57 - therealpokemon (05/30/2013) [-]
Hm. Well then.

Your point is still incorrect and malicious towards capitalism, therefore I hate you. Have a nice day, kind sir.
#55 to #54 - crotchlesshotpants (05/30/2013) [-]
This is not only a typical American problem although is really huge in the States.
#59 to #55 - conagheraxe (05/30/2013) [-]
I hope you realize that there's a difference between war-time bombings and a random terrorist attack.


Just sayin'
#77 to #59 - yunonomynameeh (05/30/2013) [-]
Not so much when you nuke somebody -it's pretty close to a terrorist attack no matter when you do it.

Not exactly a surgical strike, if you know what I mean.

Also, we technically had troops on the ground in that terrorist's country when 9/11 occurred (one of them being myself), so although you don't think we were "at war with them", we were a little. Just because that war wasn't happening in your back yard, as it was theirs -doesn't mean it wasn't happening.

And seriously, we killed a **** ton of innocent people with 2 nuclear bombs -does the fact that we were at war really make you feel better?
#166 to #77 - conagheraxe (05/30/2013) [-]
Well damn, I digress.
#168 to #166 - yunonomynameeh (05/30/2013) [-]
And I salute you, ol'chum -for your willingness to listen to another perspective, and reconsider at least part of your own.

I say! This has been quite civil.
#171 to #169 - yunonomynameeh (05/30/2013) [-]
ah, a new gentleman's response -you can never have too many of those.
User avatar #142 to #77 - osimonmagus (05/30/2013) [-]
Before your ignorance plagues the universe anymore; The dropping of the Atomic Bombs saved millions. <<<<MILLIONS. If a mainland invasion of Japan and China (American and British forces advance from Burma and India to push the Japs towards the coast) it would have been the extinction of the Japanese people. Over half a million purple hearts were pre-made in preparation for the invasion if the bombs would not work. The bombs killed less than half a million people (including radiation deaths). The world would have seen nearly the entire Japanese nation committing suicide as they had done on Iwo and Guadalcanal. They also would have indoctrinated every child and woman into the fight or would have had them kill themselves also. All you ignorant ******* don't know what you're doing when you criticize the brutality of war. Making mar people friendly makes war not seem as bad. If you have a war that kills every mothers son, daughter, and husband then the world will hesitate in having another one. You can't even begin to understand why the decisions had to be made. You're nothing but an ignorant teenager going along with the ignorant crowd who take everything as black and white and at face value. You know nothing and you have proven that.
#145 to #142 - yunonomynameeh (05/30/2013) [-]
There's certainly some ignorance here -first, there's a whole lot of assumption in your argument (a whole lot). There's also a whole lot of exaggeration (a whole lot).

Second, you clearly didn't even read everything I wrote in that comment. You were so fkn excited to share with us what you learned on the history channel, that you couldn't even finish reading my comment.
#152 to #145 - learned (05/30/2013) [-]
Well, in his defence i can say that the japs were ready to defend the emperor at all costs. They even trained nurses to suicidebomb tanks, as in crawl under them with a bomb belt. I personally think both the 9/11 and the nukes were wrong incase of civilian casualties. But yes, both times both parties were at war insome matter.
It's that, I find it lame that they labeled nuke attacks important and the 9/11 a terrorist act. IMO both were an act of terror, as in killing huge number of civilians.
I also agree with you that the fact that both were at war, doesn't justify nor of those options.
(i know i know, double negative, big whoop)
User avatar #148 to #145 - osimonmagus (05/30/2013) [-]
What I learned on the history channel? 1.Try watching the History Channel, it's not history anymore. 2.At least I have learned something. 3. None of that was exaggeration and the assumptions are based off what happened on every single island campaign in the pacific. Nearly every single Japanese soldier was killed or committed suicide. At Tarawa and Guadalcanal the women were told to kill themselves so they would not fall into the hands of the American demons. This would have not changed on the mainland of Japan. The numbers are adjusted from the statistics of casualties of prior island campaigns. Try learning something before you defend your own ignorance.
#157 to #148 - learned (05/30/2013) [-]
Well you kinda did miss the point of what he was saying....but most of your facts are correct
#153 to #148 - inamerica (05/30/2013) [-]
When we nuke a country it's for their own good!

In America!
User avatar #159 to #153 - osimonmagus (05/30/2013) [-]
It protected their citizens from their own military and government.
User avatar #79 to #77 - durkadurka (05/30/2013) [-]
The nuking of Nagasaki and Hiroshima was by far the least bloody outcome.
User avatar #109 to #79 - zorororonoa (05/30/2013) [-]
yeah, i mean, the nukes burned and disintegrated all the blood
User avatar #114 to #109 - zorororonoa (05/30/2013) [-]
I-I didn't know that : and ) automatically turned into the emoticon
User avatar #64 to #59 - defender (05/30/2013) [-]
he either doesn't or is making a joke and is smart enough to know the difference
User avatar #143 to #64 - osimonmagus (05/30/2013) [-]
Never underestimate the stupidity of the internet.
 Friends (0)