Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
User avatar #1 - threadz
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
For those wanting to know, monsanto is a company that's producing some kind of plant growth hormone or something like that.
#2 to #1 - kanedam
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
are you serious?

"The company also formerly manufactured controversial products such as the insecticide DDT, PCBs, Agent Orange, and recombinant bovine somatotropin.

Monsanto was among the first to genetically modify a plant cell, along with three academic teams, which was announced in 1983,[6] and was among the first to conduct field trials of genetically modified crops, which it did in 1987. It remained one of the top 10 U.S. chemical companies until it divested most of its chemical businesses between 1997 and 2002, through a process of mergers and spin-offs that focused the company on biotechnology.

Monsanto was a pioneer in applying the biotechnology industry business model to agriculture, using techniques developed by Genentech and other biotech drug companies in the late 1970s in California.[7] In this business model, companies invest heavily in research and development, and recoup the expenses through the use and enforcement of biological patents.[8][9][10][11] Monsanto's application of this model to agriculture, along with a growing movement to create a global, uniform system of plant breeders' rights in the 1980s, came into direct conflict with customary practices of farmers to save, reuse, share and develop plant varieties.[12] Its seed patenting model has also been criticized as biopiracy and a threat to biodiversity.[13][14][15] Monsanto's role in these changes in agriculture (which include its litigation and its seed commercialization practices[16]), its current and former agbiotech products, its lobbying of government agencies, and its history as a chemical company, have made Monsanto controversial."
just a bit...
i know, tl:dr...
User avatar #5 to #2 - dxninjaxo
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
*cough* *cough* AIM *cough* *cough*
#8 to #5 - zacsuntibidea
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
I'm strangely okay with this.
User avatar #3 to #2 - threadz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
ya... i just skimmed it
#4 to #3 - kanedam
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/28/2013) [-]
i'd say it was skimmed down so much that it became a wrong answer... or a misleading information rather.