Upload
Login or register
Refresh Comments
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #4 - Mahazama
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/24/2013) [-]
What are standard issue cammy BDU's meant to blend in with, anyways?
User avatar #18 to #4 - failtolawl
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
rather than set lines, like in the old 80s camo, it's more of a pixelated mesh setup where it's more blurry and less to be seen rather than a focusable splotch, it's not perfect, but it's much better than the previous one.
User avatar #15 to #4 - waffies
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
In concrete environments it would be somewhat deceptive.
User avatar #13 to #4 - imonagoat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
The ACU or army combat uniform is meant to be a universal camouflage pattern that was rushed into service in 2006-2007 without being properly tested first. It was the first time in military history where all the services decided to make their own work uniform different. Air force got the grey tiger stripe pattern, marines got marpat, navy got that gayass aquaflage and the army went with the ACUs but when deployed we get multicam uniforms now which are pretty tits. Though now I really only use them for paintball.
User avatar #8 to #4 - mrwalkerfour
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
combat dpm is designed to blend with multiple enviroments. it deosnt but given enough time it gets dirty and blends better then for example:

gets lots of sand and light on it= looks more deserty

gets muddy and grass stuck to it and its wet= jungle looking

#7 to #4 - thumblocked
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
It's meant to blend in with everything, thus it doesn't blend in with anything.
#12 to #7 - ajweston
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/25/2013) [-]
Except this couch and clothing racks in the px.