Upload
Login or register
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#15 - konamicode
Reply +124 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Meanwhile in a nearby museum...
#49 to #15 - anon id: 392deb26
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Hi, it's Vince with ShamArt!
#42 to #15 - kernelstack
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Modern art doesn't always have to suck, just because of its simplicity. A skilled artist can evoke emotion through a few simple strokes.
User avatar #69 to #42 - thephantur
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Looks like something I made back in preschool.
User avatar #71 to #69 - kernelstack
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Quite spot on despite the sarcasm. One of the things Miro tried to achieve during various stages in his life, was to awaken the artistic child in himself. As we grow, we tend to bury the simple but extremely creative and imaginative aspect that characterized our childhood. Creativity becomes such a complex process, most of the times overly-complex, so much that it actually can hinder itself.
User avatar #74 to #71 - thephantur
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
In other words he can't draw.
#76 to #74 - kernelstack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
No, he can't.
User avatar #77 to #76 - thephantur
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
He should draw more like that. That's talent. The one above is fingerpainting.
#78 to #77 - kernelstack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Maybe he would if he wasn't dead since 1983.
User avatar #79 to #78 - thephantur
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Oh well. At least there won't be anymore "overly complex" drawings.
#66 to #42 - anon id: 4a7a0bd0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
It doesn't suck because it's simple. It sucks because it's literally spilled paint. Don't even try to glorify it and give people the deeper meaning ********.
User avatar #43 to #42 - plutobr
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
Picture unrelated, right?
User avatar #46 to #43 - kernelstack
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
It's Miro...
User avatar #48 to #46 - plutobr
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
And?
I won't judge a painting based on who made it.
User avatar #50 to #48 - kernelstack
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
You really don't seem to be in a position to judge paintings anyway. You can't "judge" the quality of art when you lack basic knowledge of its representatives.
User avatar #39 to #15 - chupiter
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
These two canvases represents the duality in life. The slates puts us into different groups and divides us not only in the material plane, but also in the abstract one. The bright yellow hue is a homage to everything that is yellow. But also a homage to everything that isn't yellow. When hung so close we might be able too cross from one group or plane into another, but still the gap between is dangerous and risky. Only the bravest take the leap, and only the most skilled succeed. Therefore it is a game of money and business. One slate is pure and yellow, whereas the other one is a bit worn. This symbolizes the transfiguration from loser to winner in a society of this particular way of thinking.

Tl;dr - This artwork sucks.
#81 to #39 - anon id: bb0b5d2b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
The bright yellow hue is a homage to everything that is yellow.
The bright yellow hue is a homage
yellow hue is a homage
yellow hue
hue
huehuehuehuehuehuehuehuehuehuehue
#33 to #15 - butiloveu
Reply +16 123456789123345869
(05/19/2013) [-]
fixed