fucking math. .. Cancelling out the (10-10) in both the numerator and the denominator is akin to dividing by zero, which, internet jokes aside, is a mathematical impossibility.

Comments(47):

[ 47 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - markertemp (05/11/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Cancelling out the (10-10) in both the numerator and the denominator is akin to dividing by zero, which, internet jokes aside, is a mathematical impossibility.
#11 - magnusos ONLINE (05/12/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Errors.... Errors and mistakes everywhere!!
Errors.... Errors and mistakes everywhere!!
User avatar #4 - jovanlisac (05/11/2013) [-]
that is just a proof that you cant divide by zero
#27 - Fagdust (05/12/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Comment Picture
#36 - gravitystereo (05/12/2013) [+] (1 reply)
1. Where the **** did this come from?
2. Cannot divide by 0
#40 to #36 - karlossacramento (05/12/2013) [-]
1. is legit, 100-100 = 0

2. is also legit, since 10 * (10-10) = 0 = 100-100
the step after 2. is where he ****** up, since canceled the term by 0, which is not allowed, therefore getting an invalid result
+1
#56 - adzo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44 - kevinipples (05/12/2013) [-]
too bad 10(10-10) is 0 so you cant cancel something and magically turn 0 into 10
#15 - curses (05/12/2013) [+] (14 replies)
I'm more confused how he got the 100 - 100/ 100 - 100 to 10.10.

Because 100 - 100 = 0
The other will also become 0 and the answer from that should be 0. How does he suddenly get 10.10 from it? Even if it was 100/100 he'd get 1 from it and not 10.

Did they change math in school? :/
User avatar #22 to #20 - hopcroft (05/12/2013) [-]
Dont be a retard, look at the progression, it is clear that it is implied to be 10*10. Your comment looks nothing more than a troll.
User avatar #14 - phoenix grinder (05/12/2013) [-]
amazing you got dozens of thumbs off this, on a site that was so perplexed and angered by the capcha wars
#2 - bioparticles (05/11/2013) [-]
mfw I had not yet noticed the divide by zero
#67 - thahobomaster (05/12/2013) [-]
Take the "ing" out of the title and you will have me on agreeable terms
#66 - fuckinjunk (05/12/2013) [-]
The Funnyjunk Community really needs to learn some basic math.
#64 - devilhare (05/12/2013) [-]
This seems to be a specific example of generic proof that dividing by 0 is equal to infinity (any number) . If we rearrange op's starting equation with x for 2 we find 0 = 0 * x. Because 0 times any number is zero the proof works for 2. Nothing is wrong with any of op's other steps and he has not disobeyed any mathematical syntax. PEMDAS need not apply because factoring both the top and bottom by (10-10) and dividing to get (10-10)/(10-10) can be done and equals 1. /explanation
User avatar #60 - huntertde (05/12/2013) [-]
Parenthesis
Exponent
Multiplication -or-
Division
Addition -or-
Subtraction
in that order.
0
#58 - hugotr **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#23 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Actually, 0/0 is equal to anything.
0=0*3 and 0=0*69 so 0/0=3 and 0/0=69
#12 - ArcaciaStrain (05/12/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Solved it. Sorry about the text colour, paint wasn't working with me whatsoever.
#24 to #12 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Bitch, did you just call it Pedmas instead of Pemdas?
#5 - clphewitt (05/12/2013) [-]
102Euquals10=10
#3 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Cute, but there are logistical errors
[ 47 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)