fucking math. .. Cancelling out the (10-10) in both the numerator and the denominator is akin to dividing by zero, which, internet jokes aside, is a mathematical impossibility.
Home Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

fucking math

+181
Views: 11958
Favorited: 38
Submitted: 05/11/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to overworld E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(47):

[ 47 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#67 - thahobomaster (05/12/2013) [-]
Take the "ing" out of the title and you will have me on agreeable terms
#66 - fuckinjunk ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
The Funnyjunk Community really needs to learn some basic math.
#64 - devilhare (05/12/2013) [-]
This seems to be a specific example of generic proof that dividing by 0 is equal to infinity (any number) . If we rearrange op's starting equation with x for 2 we find 0 = 0 * x. Because 0 times any number is zero the proof works for 2. Nothing is wrong with any of op's other steps and he has not disobeyed any mathematical syntax. PEMDAS need not apply because factoring both the top and bottom by (10-10) and dividing to get (10-10)/(10-10) can be done and equals 1. /explanation
User avatar #60 - huntertde (05/12/2013) [-]
Parenthesis
Exponent
Multiplication -or-
Division
Addition -or-
Subtraction
in that order.
#59 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Why was OP late for his math class? He caught the Rhombus.
0
#58 - hugotr **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
+1
#56 - adzo **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #44 - kevinipples ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
too bad 10(10-10) is 0 so you cant cancel something and magically turn 0 into 10
#37 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Assuming 0/0 is actually possible, I found a proof that 0/0 can equal any even number.

Starting at OP's step 4:
(10+10)(10-10)/10(10-10) = (10+10)/10 * (10-10)/(10-10);

Because (10-10)/(10-10) = 0/0 = 2;

(10+10)(10-10)/10(10-10) = (10+10)/10 * 2 = 4;

0/0 = 2, 4, 6, ...
#36 - gravitystereo (05/12/2013) [-]
1. Where the **** did this come from?
2. Cannot divide by 0
#40 to #36 - karlossacramento (05/12/2013) [-]
1. is legit, 100-100 = 0

2. is also legit, since 10 * (10-10) = 0 = 100-100
the step after 2. is where he ****** up, since canceled the term by 0, which is not allowed, therefore getting an invalid result
#27 - Fagdust (05/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#39 to #27 - Aidansub (05/12/2013) [-]
Good is good and evil's bad, kids get killed when god gets mad, so you better take a good look at the good book!
#23 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Actually, 0/0 is equal to anything.
0=0*3 and 0=0*69 so 0/0=3 and 0/0=69
#15 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
I'm more confused how he got the 100 - 100/ 100 - 100 to 10.10.

Because 100 - 100 = 0
The other will also become 0 and the answer from that should be 0. How does he suddenly get 10.10 from it? Even if it was 100/100 he'd get 1 from it and not 10.

Did they change math in school? :/
User avatar #21 to #15 - hopcroft (05/12/2013) [-]
10 . 10 is the same as saying 10 X 10 YAY MATHS.
#25 to #21 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
The thing is, the picture has it written down by hand. If it was on PC I could accept it but he used hand writing.

He clearly puts the dot at the bottom on both of them which gives him 10.10 which is where my confusion starts. How does he get that out 0/0?
#28 to #25 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
So what? People write equations in different manners in different parts of the world. Its 10*10 deal with it
#30 to #28 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
Really now? Because Math tend to be the same no matter where you go. Moving that dot around changes quite a bit and I doubt it's supposed to be like that.
#38 to #30 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Were you experienced in math, you'd realise putting a dot is WELL ACCEPTED convention.

It's used for two (main) reasons:

1) writing an "x" every time becomes tiresome and mathematicians are all about efficiency.

2) when you use the symbol "x" as a variable, it can be confusing to have a sign with character.
User avatar #19 to #15 - europeanswallow (05/12/2013) [-]
10.10 is the same as 10 times 10
#20 to #19 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
10.10 is not 10 times 10. If it was the dot would be in the middle and not at the bottom. So now it's just 10.10 and not 10*10.

So I don't see how it's 10*10 at all. Where did he get that other 0.10 from? When there where two equal numbers being divided? Well the equal numbers where 0 so it shouldn't become 10.10 to begin with.
User avatar #22 to #20 - hopcroft (05/12/2013) [-]
Dont be a retard, look at the progression, it is clear that it is implied to be 10*10. Your comment looks nothing more than a troll.
User avatar #63 to #22 - lolollo ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
No, it's not. You can't just say "it's implied" as an argument for anything. The guy wrote the dot wrong. It's incorrect syntax. You can't just ******* use improper syntax and say "Well it's implied!" because you could've just wrote it the right way the first time like someone who's not a god damn moron.
#26 to #22 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
But how the hell does he get 10*10 from that above?

Because the above is 100 - 100 / 100 - 100 which should be 0. Because they zero themselves out. Also anything split by 0 will become 0.
How on earth does he get 10 times 10? Also it looks like hand writing to me so I'm going with 10,10 on those numbers. I'd buy it if it was on a PC but those double zeros does not look like a PC writing to me.
#31 to #26 - brainy (05/12/2013) [-]
he gets 100-100=10*10-10*10
since you multiply before retracting
#32 to #31 - curses (05/12/2013) [-]
But in the first part with 100 - 100/100 - 100 there is no multiplication.

The person indicated that whatever would come from the above would be the same that below.
So that 10 times 10 is a separate problem from the one above because it's after the =

Also looking a bit more, he suddenly lost 90 points on the bottom side for no good reason and 80 points on the bottom right side. That does not add up at all. You can not just remove points like that when you've had two equations that have come down to 0.
#34 to #32 - brainy (05/12/2013) [-]
you can expand 100 to 10*10 that is totally legal in math problems
he then says 10*10=10^2 so its (10^2-10^2)/10*10-10*10 he can then simplify 10*10-10*10 on the buttom to 10*(10-10) also legal
and 10^2-10^2 to (10+10)*(10-10) also legal
he then says that (10-10)/(10-10)=1 meaning he can remove it, also a legal move in math.
this leaves (10+10)/10=2
All he does is abusing mathematical rules.
#16 to #15 - bigmanblue ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
he goes from 100-100 to 10.10 -10.10
which is the same as 10^2-10^2 =100-100
User avatar #14 - phoenix grinder ONLINE (05/12/2013) [-]
amazing you got dozens of thumbs off this, on a site that was so perplexed and angered by the capcha wars
User avatar #13 - Sethorein (05/12/2013) [-]
3rd line is a bit bananas
#12 - ArcaciaStrain (05/12/2013) [-]
Solved it. Sorry about the text colour, paint wasn't working with me whatsoever.
#24 to #12 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
Bitch, did you just call it Pedmas instead of Pemdas?
#11 - magnusos (05/12/2013) [-]
Errors.... Errors and mistakes everywhere!!
Errors.... Errors and mistakes everywhere!!
0
#17 to #11 - slipons has deleted their comment [-]
#9 - anonymous (05/12/2013) [-]
1/0 = 0

0*0 = 1

You simply cannot put up 0/0
#5 - clphewitt (05/12/2013) [-]
102Euquals10=10
[ 47 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)