Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #10 - KayRed (05/10/2013) [-]
That article is ******** . The writer says that the actor doesn't matter, all marvel movies need are the special affects "the hulk movies prove'. I really hope he is being sarcastic, if not, he's an idiot. Even with all the special affects, those movies would be **** without those actors portraying. This isn't replacing that asshole Terrance Howard with Don Cheadle; Ruffalo and Evans portray their characters awesomely (and Tom Hiddleston, but it is unlikely he'll be in the next one), and I doubt anyone else can portray them as well.
#198 to #10 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [-]
Tom Hiddleston is returning as Loki in the next Thor movie
#150 to #10 - spankcakes (05/11/2013) [-]
This will be the cast of next avengers movie and it will only cost 5 bucks to make it.
#112 to #10 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [-]
I preferred Edward Norton's portrayal of Hulk
User avatar #80 to #10 - arborday (05/11/2013) [-]
so... chris evans is on the level of JGL and ryan gosling? lolwut
User avatar #83 to #80 - KayRed (05/11/2013) [-]
I've only seen Chris Evans as Cpt. America, and I thought he did a fanatastic job, and I never seen a movie with Ryan Gosling, so I would say yeah.
User avatar #85 to #83 - arborday (05/11/2013) [-]
...

That is completely fair.
User avatar #36 to #10 - jeudyfeo (05/11/2013) [-]
Yeah but Iron Man/Tony had pretty much the same amount of screentime as, Captn America, Hulk/Bruce, ect. and Robert Downey Jr. Got paid 50 Million while the rest of the cast got 4 million and below.
He's just saying they deserve more
User avatar #12 to #10 - infinitereaper (05/10/2013) [-]
The old Hulk was better

And yes, special effects let people tell a story they couldn't without them.

Like Avatar. Great movie, great story, but impossible without effects.

Actors are important.
User avatar #57 to #12 - condormcninja (05/11/2013) [-]
You could tell the story without special effects, it's called Dances with Wolves
#52 to #12 - carlfroch (05/11/2013) [-]
Avatar? you mean Pocahontas 3d?
Avatar? you mean Pocahontas 3d?
#53 to #52 - infinitereaper (05/11/2013) [-]
You people are all so original.
You people are all so original.
User avatar #13 to #12 - daboomee (05/10/2013) [-]
>Avatar
>Great story

Oh, my sides.
#63 to #13 - vycanismajoris (05/11/2013) [-]
Just let him ******* have his ******* opinion about a ******* movie, you ******* piece of **** , what ******* harm does it make if he ******* likes something and you don't, you ******* bitch ****** . I bet your mom's taste is fashion is questionable at best.
#23 to #13 - infinitereaper (05/10/2013) [-]
Meh I don't care about the hipster 						********					 surrounding this movie, it was good, "ripoff" oh 						*******					 please half of the blockbuster hits today can be considered "rippoffs" but its about originality and unique twists.   
   
I liked it. Don't be hate'n
Meh I don't care about the hipster ******** surrounding this movie, it was good, "ripoff" oh ******* please half of the blockbuster hits today can be considered "rippoffs" but its about originality and unique twists.

I liked it. Don't be hate'n
User avatar #31 to #23 - deescalation ONLINE (05/11/2013) [-]
I don't count "but in space" as a unique twist
User avatar #46 to #31 - infinitereaper (05/11/2013) [-]
Well you people can hate all you want but I liked it and thought it was good. That's enough for me. Thankfully I go through life enjoying a lot of different things. Can't say the same for a lot of other people.
User avatar #15 to #13 - Keleth (05/10/2013) [-]
what was wrong with Avatars story? it set a ******* record for profits. i think a lot of people agree it was a great story
User avatar #25 to #15 - BmanX (05/11/2013) [-]
Because the story was why people went to see Avatar, right?
#24 to #15 - shredmaster (05/11/2013) [-]
Avatar was shiny Pocahontas, and it didn't deserve to be longer than 90 minutes. I didn't give one singular **** about any of the characters. The main protagonist was the most two-dimensional character I've ever seen. The effects were absolutely gorgeous, the plot itself was nothing special or unique at all.
User avatar #16 to #15 - daboomee (05/10/2013) [-]
You mean other than the fact that it just basically ripped of Dances with wolves, Pocahontas and Ferngully? It's the same story over and over again about how "the white man is evil and wants to take over the natives".
User avatar #26 to #16 - infinitereaper (05/11/2013) [-]
So what movies do you like then?
#69 to #26 - anonymous (05/11/2013) [-]
The movies other people like that he hasn't actually seen.
 Friends (0)