Random fact: Good guy fetus. . During pregnancy if the meme ' sur ers organ damage, the baby in the womb ends stem cells to repair the damaged organ. This is why pregnant women make the best soldiers.
x
Click to expand

Comments(121):

[ 121 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#2 - jakatackka (05/08/2013) [-]
This is why pregnant women make the best soldiers.
User avatar #107 to #2 - vangoz (05/09/2013) [-]
Yup all those ******* hormones raging at once and the enemy combatants will **** themselves and run away.
#34 to #2 - applescryatnight ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
sooooo....what you are saying is....
we need to attatch babies to people to make super soldiers?
we need to get right on this!
User avatar #27 to #2 - retardedboss ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
Here I was thinking it was because they had all that extra fetus class body armor.
#44 to #27 - sliferzpwns ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
Fetus Class Body armor you say?
User avatar #45 to #44 - retardedboss ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
That's infantry class armor. noob.
User avatar #96 to #44 - pokeface (05/09/2013) [-]
Those aren't fetuses, those are actually babies. Does anyone on this site know what they are talking about, ever?
#59 - ishotthedeputy (05/09/2013) [-]
"Sir, we have a damaged liver."
"Has it requested backup?"
"No. All communications are down."
"Send in the recon cells. I want...a W-672 formation"
"But sir-"
"DO WHAT I ******* TELL OR I SWEAR TO GOD I'M BRINGING YOU DOWN WITH ME IN THE ABORTION"
#9 - pocoyothegreat (05/08/2013) [-]
Gotta love FJ, where any random fake/falacy fact post gets to the frontpage.
Gotta love FJ, where any random fake/falacy fact post gets to the frontpage.
#53 to #9 - outlawgentleman ONLINE (05/09/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #1 - MatthewChad (05/08/2013) [-]
Could you tell me where you got this information? It sounds awesome, but I have never heard or the infant sending anything to the mother.
User avatar #7 to #1 - bramdk (05/08/2013) [-]
well fetuses do send things to their mother
they gets oxygen and other stuff from the mother and gives of the leftover carbon dioxide and other waste products
User avatar #8 to #7 - martycamp (05/08/2013) [-]
That's completely different. Yes, they exchange gases, nutrients and waste products. But cells CANNOT cross the placenta. Even if this were possible, the mother's immune system would attack it.
User avatar #11 to #8 - bramdk (05/08/2013) [-]
yea i was reffering to the fact that he said anything instead of cells
while some things do get transferred
User avatar #118 to #1 - mcrut (05/09/2013) [-]
Actually, inside your mother are bit of your cells in her blood and other places left inside of her.
#58 - javalavalay **User deleted account** (05/09/2013) [-]
So they live longer

they can reproduce

and even regenerate organs?!

That's like cheating maaan.
User avatar #51 - sirbutterballs (05/09/2013) [-]
I could just imagine that.
Alright let's have a system check
Heart: Well
Stomach: Well
Lungs: Well
*Mother falls on her side*
The kidney's have taken critical damage,
Repair Function:Activate
Location: Right Kidney
All systems are stable.
User avatar #29 - TheOriginalNerd ONLINE (05/08/2013) [-]
it doesnt send them

the mom simply steals the cells because **** the baby
User avatar #39 to #29 - tonicwater (05/08/2013) [-]
Because if something goes wrong with the mother, the baby will be totally fine anyway.
#69 - neosonic (05/09/2013) [-]
I read it as system damage....
User avatar #4 - martycamp (05/08/2013) [-]
That sounds like bull **** to me. There's no way a cell can get across the placenta. The only things that go across the placenta are nutrients and IgG antibodies (and some viruses). Besides, if it did, it'd get attacked by the mother's immune system.
#46 to #4 - anon (05/08/2013) [-]
Though I don't think this is true. A mother and her child actually have extremely similar immune systems. We are attracted to a person that has differing immunities to promise the best outcome of surviving offspring. And in fact, after my son was born, he would only have colds when I did for the first year or so.
User avatar #125 to #46 - martycamp (05/09/2013) [-]
It doesn't matter if your immune system is "similar" or not. On the surface of your cells, you have markers called "antigens". These antigens are unique to each individual, and mark your cells as "self", so your immune system doesn't attack it.

And the reason your son had colds at the same time as you was because you infected him. His immune system was up and running properly yet, and he got exposed to the cold or virus from you.
User avatar #78 to #46 - crazyhindu (05/09/2013) [-]
well actually its not extremely similar its exactly the same the baby has the mothers immune system until it can develop its own.
User avatar #124 to #78 - martycamp (05/09/2013) [-]
Yes, you're correct in thinking that the foetus doesn't have its own immune system yet. However, it's not exactly correct in thinking that the foetus "has its mothers immune system". The foetus in the womb is encased in an amniotic sac, which acts as a barrier to anything that tries to get in via the vagina. The umbilical cord is attached to the placenta, which is attached to wall of the uterus. Inside the placenta, the mother's and foetus' blood comes very close, within about a cell of each other, but the DO NOT mix. This is because the mother would identify the foetal blood as foreign, and it'd be exactly like getting the wrong type of blood during a transplant. Also, this prevents many pathogens from crossing from the mother to the foetus because the baby doesn't have any sort of protection yet.

However, on specific type of antibody can cross from the mother into the foetus (IgG as I mentioned above). This isn't really to the same degree as having your own immune system, and though it helps, it wouldn't be enough to battle a full on infection.
User avatar #129 to #124 - crazyhindu (05/09/2013) [-]
Oh, well thank you for educating me on that.
#20 to #4 - anon (05/08/2013) [-]
But stem cells haven't been 'allocated' to a specific role in the body. So they would not be detected as a foregin cell until differentiation occurs which suggests this could actually happen o.o
User avatar #22 to #20 - martycamp (05/08/2013) [-]
Actually, stem cells have antigens on their surface even before differentiation.
#79 to #22 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
no they dont
User avatar #126 to #79 - martycamp (05/09/2013) [-]
Yes, actually, they do. EVERY SINGLE cell in your body produces antigens, some of which are different based on what role it plays. Stem cells are no different. They have antigens marking them as stem cells, and this changes after differentiation.
User avatar #100 - onezeroeight (05/09/2013) [-]
I dont know about you guys, but i saw this and thought "no **** . If something breaks in my house, i fix that **** too"
#28 - Thinngol (05/08/2013) [-]
For everyone saying doubt, source, etc.: http://circres.ahajournals.org/content/110/1/82.short

Not a huge journal, but the experiment seems sound.
#26 - davvi (05/08/2013) [-]
really ..
really ..
#31 - felixjarl (05/08/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #82 to #77 - Ottovan (05/09/2013) [-]
Because of Christianity.

And don't anyone tell me it's not, because it is.
User avatar #88 to #82 - iamkagji (05/09/2013) [-]
That's also the same reason that cloning is so heavily restricted. Also gene research, brain mapping and countless other branches of science that could be universally beneficial. I don't hate religion, but more people need to stop giving a **** about it.
User avatar #89 to #88 - Ottovan (05/09/2013) [-]
We mix religion and state.

That is not what the founding fathers wanted.

We are allowed to believe whatever the hell we want, but were NOT allowed to let our religions interfere with our laws and choices.
User avatar #93 to #89 - iamkagji (05/09/2013) [-]
I agree. Laws should be based on logic, and religion by definition does not require that for its moral code. Therefore, imposing these rules on anyone outside of the religion is oppressive and unjust.
User avatar #98 to #89 - aceofshadows (05/09/2013) [-]
No separation of church and state was meant to keep any church entity from having a government position (the pope stopping a law from being passed for example). Nowhere does it state that a value or the values of any religion can not be applied to law.
User avatar #108 to #89 - Ruspanic ONLINE (05/09/2013) [-]
I disagree. The First Amendment forbids the "establishment of religion" by government (i.e. imposing a state religion or making laws designed to promote a religion), but it's inevitable that religious beliefs will inform morals and decisions. That's not unconstitutional and it's certainly not against the founding principles.

If your religion causes you to believe that humans have the same right to life pre-birth as post-birth, you are not Constitutionally required to ignore those beliefs when you're voting or making policy. If you hold that premise to be true, it makes perfect sense to want to protect the unborn from abortion and research procedures. That's not the same as wanting to criminalize "sin" or apostasy or something.
0
#97 to #89 - aceofshadows has deleted their comment [-]
#87 to #82 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
it's not.
User avatar #43 - bobindun (05/08/2013) [-]
Thumb for tittle.
#92 - wherethawhitewomen (05/09/2013) [-]
So if a retarded girl gets pregnant her baby will repair her brain?
So if a retarded girl gets pregnant her baby will repair her brain?
#99 to #92 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
NO DUMBASS IF SHE IS ALREADY RETARDED NOTHING HAPPENS IT HAS TO HAPPEN WHILE SHE IS PREGNANT READ MORE CAREFULLY NEXT TIME
User avatar #103 to #99 - angreif (05/09/2013) [-]
I didn't even know the north Koreans had internet. pretty sure that if they're gonna pay for something they'd pay for something more luxurious. like food.
User avatar #111 to #110 - angreif (05/09/2013) [-]
Look at anonymous's name today. Think about the fact that most north koreans are starving. Realize I was just making a joke that I thought most people would understand. Good night.
User avatar #112 to #111 - hammarhead (05/09/2013) [-]
its been like that for week. dont be offended, friend
User avatar #114 to #112 - angreif (05/09/2013) [-]
Aha, I haven't been on in weeks. And i didn't mean to sound offended, I'm just damned tired, hence the good night.
#10 - yunablade (05/08/2013) [-]
**yunablade rolled a random image posted in comment #56 at HELP ME **   
   
So tehcnically speaking, geting pregnant gives you a healer on your party?   
   
Dude!
**yunablade rolled a random image posted in comment #56 at HELP ME **

So tehcnically speaking, geting pregnant gives you a healer on your party?

Dude!
#63 - benighted (05/09/2013) [-]
SCIENCE!!!
#120 to #63 - anon (05/09/2013) [-]
Science is what we need to understand how you get to fit so many dicks in your butt, faggot. There's no science in this **** .
#122 to #120 - benighted (05/09/2013) [-]
explain to me how we were able to discover, view and study this process then faggot.
explain to me how we were able to discover, view and study this process then faggot.
User avatar #91 - shinobidesu (05/09/2013) [-]
>only so they can be born
[ 121 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)