The way it should be. .. but the leader doesn't drop any loot The way it should be but the leader doesn't drop any loot
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (401)
[ 401 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #35 - anomsssssss
Reply +510 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
but the leader doesn't drop any loot
User avatar #47 to #35 - wersand
Reply -13 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Except they do drop a lot of loot. To bad the kill always goes to the closest relatives.
#343 to #35 - repostpatrol
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #39 to #35 - sonoobish
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
that was good
#425 to #39 - anon id: 2afa0c1d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
Faggot.
User avatar #423 to #35 - obeyweegee
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
At least the game doesn't end when you defeat the final leader.
User avatar #43 to #35 - reican
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
no, the leader bring you to the boss and share the loot with you even if you hardly did anything
#206 to #43 - anon id: 063088b2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
ASIANS CAN ACTUALLY READ MINDS!!!!!!!!!!!
They can hear, and see what you're visually thinking. This is the absolute complete truth!!!!!

The reason a lot of Asians have completely expressionless faces is so they don't accidently show facial expressions when people think things they don't like, find funny, astonishing, etc, and Asians segregate so their not nearly as susceptible to that happening.
Asians also segregate, and are untalkative to avoid accidently saying things that are similar to what people are thinking and going to say.

Try thinking, and visually picturing things that are as wild as you can when you are around Asians, and look for Asians who give people dirty/particular looks for what appears to be for completely no reason.

PLEASE SPREAD THE MESSAGE!!!!! THE WORLD NEEDS TO KNOW THIS!!!!!
#276 to #206 - dafuckisthisshit
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
User avatar #389 to #276 - swalshy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Can I borrow this?:)




Forever
User avatar #408 to #389 - dafuckisthisshit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
of course
#152 - kernelstack
Reply +250 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Real life.
#426 to #152 - anon id: d2a7a8dc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
suck up = Dwight K Shrute
User avatar #79 - sirfisticuffs
Reply +175 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Boss:"Work harder"!
Leader: "Work harder"!
Employee: "******* cunts".
#264 to #79 - anon id: fd0f0c1a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Yeah but with a leader you're doing less work, because he's pulling his weight, and he's pushing the hardest
#87 - ghouleyed
Reply +103 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**ghouleyed rolled a random image posted in comment #9 at Rifle cal. ** <- This is the leader which all respects
#197 - retrochris
Reply +47 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**retrochris rolls 61**
#243 to #197 - koneella
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**koneella rolls 702** let your lord show the way
#260 to #243 - batwill **User deleted account**
Reply +23 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**batwill rolls 66** I wish for dubs!
#395 to #260 - bagofshit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
*********** rolls 78** ****
User avatar #396 to #395 - bagofshit
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
So...Someone got a 7?
#289 to #197 - anon id: 7c624ede
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**anonymous rolls 2** here ya go take this
#198 to #197 - retrochris
Reply +75 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
#296 to #198 - anon id: 156df14f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
**anonymous rolls 64**
#107 - dwarfman
Reply +62 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
/sigh this is not commetary on socialism but leadership. An active leader is not a communist ideal but a role any successful venture should strive to have.
User avatar #131 to #107 - tinyer
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I didn't know what you were talking about until I scrolled down
#55 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +38 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
The reason I don't trust socialism or communism is because every time a country tries to convert to communism look what happens, masses get slaughtered and the system gets bastardized. Tell me, what about the people who refuse to work? Should they be punished? If no then why should anyone work? If yes then what are you gonna do? Shoot them? Socialism and communism are flawed systems of government, they have never worked and will never work. It's wishful thinking, end of story. The only people who support socialism have never lived in a "socialist" society or are so brainwashed by it that they feel they need to support it. If you want to prove me wrong show me an example of communism or socialism working on a large scale. We're living in a society where trying to be successful is wrong, anyone with money is shunned if they even spend a dime on themselves and people who sit on their ass all day are praised.
Communism doesn't mean nobody suffers, it means that if one person suffers then so does everyone else.
#88 to #55 - anon id: 89947c76
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Too long, didn't read.
User avatar #91 to #55 - kuromegane
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Well, lets face facts. In capitalism we have the freedom to choose, to work, to live. To work harder and earn more is entirely up to a person's will power. Communism does have its pros and cons, and so does any political system. Every system has its flaws, what not that it is filled with human beings which are susceptible to evils? Appreciate what we have now.
User avatar #98 to #55 - avatarsarefornoobs
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
you definitely used that picture wrong. you are preaching to the choir. i dont think very many people here are convinced that socialism/communism is a good idea.
#140 to #55 - anon id: eb6adf70
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
are you talking about my glorious country? come here and feel the peaceful and wealthy country you ever imagined
#143 to #55 - anon id: 2dffc87b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, socialism and communism are flawed, but as long as mankind are the ones making the systems, they will always be flawed. So all we have to do is try and find the right one.
#238 to #143 - anon id: 2dffc87b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Uh, what I meant to say was all we can do it try and find the one that works the best, even though it will still be flawed
#89 to #55 - neznanc **User deleted account**
Reply +15 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Yugoslavia was a fine example of pretty healthy socialism until the serbian/croat nationalism spoiled it. If you ask anyone in Slovenia about Yugoslavia they will tell that it was a calm and peaceful country where everyone had a job, good payments that were almost the same for everyone, rights to vacation, free school education and health care for everyone. What people don't know is that Yu had a socialistic regime much milder that it was under the Soviet block, and it actually worked for almost 50 years when it collapsed in a war because of stupid nationalism. What are ex-yu countries today? Just a bunch of small insignificant areas whose corrupt politics fight each other on Haag courts because of border disputes, war crimes and recklessly spend national reserves, while citizens of this states only want peace, jobs and payments. Do not throw all socialist regimes under same roof, cause there might be huge difference between them just like between capitalist regimes.
User avatar #115 to #89 - alfjnn
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
YEAH MAN.
I grew up in Yugoslavia, I remember the 90s and ****.
"SMRT FASHIZMU DRUZO."

Serb here, btw. Nationalism ruined our great nation, and still plagues it to this day. I mean. Tito was pretty cool guy, but at the same time, it wasn't fun when everything you owned was made by Zastava
Even the soap was made by Zastava, rofl. If you wanted like a decent pair of pants, you'd have to pay unlimited dinar.
User avatar #99 to #89 - schnizel
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Smrt Fašizmu druže neznanc!
User avatar #106 to #99 - neznanc **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
svoboda narodu!
#435 to #89 - edemylove **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
Da ti kazem nesto.
Ti si vjeroatno ono godiste koje nije ni bilo u ratu, nego rodeno za vrijeme njega ili poslje.
I sad tebi je neko tulio da je juga bila obecana zemlja i ti to prihvacas, a neznas ni sam ni za udbu ni za radne akcije ni za ostale stvari poput manjka slobode. Ako je to bila dobra zemlja za zivjet onda neznam kakvo razmisljanje vi imate.
User avatar #438 to #435 - neznanc **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
Juga je imela veliko napak, kot vsaka država ki se je rodila iz vojne. Res je, živeli smo v diktaturi, prikrajšani za veliko stvari, ki so jih imele druge (zahodne) države. Ampak, če ne bi bilo razpada Jugoslavije in posledično vojne, bi se Jugoslavija lahko POSTOPOMA liberalizirala in sprejemala prvine demokracije. Samo neumni nacionalizem je uničil to državo in danes je bivša Juga kup enih vukojebnih nacionalističnih prepotentnih držav ki so brez veljave in v svetu pomenijo en drek saj lahko vsak manipulira z njihovimi suverenostmi.
#157 to #89 - anon id: 31ad45c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Too bad the "calm and peaceful country" executed anyone who criticized it for stamping out old cultures.
#223 to #157 - anon id: 7d1c2ed5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Yeah, that's why so many ex-yugoslavs are praising it.
User avatar #353 to #55 - ryander
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
from what i've been told:
"The morals and ethics under a Communist government are not only sensible, but fair and are all aiming toward an equal and non-prejudiced society.
The problem with Communism is the way it is executed.
In all cases it has resulted in a distinct separation of two classes, rich tyrannical state officials and their working impoverished."
#277 to #55 - anon id: 25b30fbd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
You rag on about communism and socialism and yet this content has nothing to do with what socialism and communism is about.
This lack of basic knowledge shows you have no idea what you are talking about. Not saying communism/socialism is a good thing, but why should I listen to someone who can't even recognize what is and is not socialism/communism?
User avatar #286 to #277 - thatguywhohasbacon
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
To clarify this for you and everyone else.
This comment is almost entirely irrelevant to the content, I felt the need to post this because of all of the pro-socialism and anti-capitalism crap that was brewing in the comments section below my comment. It has nothing to do with the content but it had everything to do with what was going on in the comment section at the time. I haven't replied to anyone in this comment string for the simple fact that I was hoping it would die out, obviously I was terribly mistaken, it's also become irrelevant to the comment section in it's current form. I'm sorry for anyone who wasted their time reading my rant above thinking it was anything important but I was attempting to nip the problem at the bud and it seems I was premature in my actions. And to clarify: I didn't delete my comment because, on principle, I almost never delete any comments of mine no matter how stupid or irrelevant.
#418 to #55 - anon id: bffd7462
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
This content had nothing to do with socialism or communism.

Jimmy-rustler.
#109 to #55 - tomthehippie
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Three things;
1; Socialism=/=Communism
1; There has never been a true Communist country, every country that has become "Communist" has in fact been Stalinist. The simple fact is that Communism was never meant to be applied at a national level, the "Communist Utopia" that Lennon and Marx wanted was a world wide community level communism. No government above city or perhaps county level.
3; America is socialist.

Socialism is where the government uses public funds (taxes) to do things for the people it governs.

For instance; public schools, public roads, libraries, the interstate highways, police, fire departments, social security, medicare/medicaid, food stamps, social security disability pay, so on and so forth.

These are all socialist programs. We live in a Socialist Republic, not a Democracy or pure Republic.

This is completely in line with the Founding Father's vision of what America should be. In fact, we are actually LESS socialist than they wanted. For instance, Colleges when first introduced where supposed to be free for any and all citizens (with only minor fees for non-citizens). No lab fees, no book fees, no cost at all.

Note that in countries that have their college system like the Founding Fathers wanted, every citizen pays 9,600 dollars (or the equivalent of in their currency) in taxes that go directly to running the colleges through out the country. These countries have nearly three times as many college graduates as we do, and these graduates are not burdened by debt, meaning they can immediately go and start their own business or get started in their field with no debt to for profit banks, meaning their earnings after graduation go straight in to the economy.
User avatar #113 to #109 - alfjnn
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Communism still doesn't work, regardless, the whole idea that all works and labors are equal, is silly.
#114 to #113 - tomthehippie
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I never said otherwise, merely that communism has never been done as Marx and Lennon wanted. It has always been done in the mold of Stalinist Communism.
User avatar #116 to #114 - alfjnn
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Yugoslavia was a Pan-National State, and completely different from the Stalinistic Regimes of the time.
#118 to #116 - tomthehippie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
And still, there was a National government, which is against true Marxist Communism, which holds the ideal of government being done purely at the city or county level world wide.
User avatar #121 to #118 - alfjnn
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Pan National Government, you have to understand. Yugoslavia was a collection of Nations, held together under the Banner of Panslavicism.

Marxism is null because no one wants to be ******* communist anymore. Pan-National is the closest thing you'll get to globalization.

Pan National =/= National.
#124 to #121 - tomthehippie
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I never said Marxism was a good idea, you still seem to not understand this. All I have said is that it was never done the way Marx and Lennon intended.

That being said, there is still a national government (or governments) correct? If so, then it still is not being done the way Marx and Lennon intended.

I'm hoping you can actually understand this concept this time.
User avatar #128 to #124 - alfjnn
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Keep in mind that Communism =/= Anarchism, and that for a communist state to exist, it must be governed in some way or another, else it becomes anarchy.

Read the Manifesto, guy.
#130 to #128 - tomthehippie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I never said no government. Please do us both a favor and actually read what I say.

I said a world wide group of governments that do not go beyond a city or county level. That is not Anarchism.

I'm hoping you can comprehend this simple concept.
User avatar #136 to #130 - alfjnn
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Try actually reading the Manifesto, man.
It's short quick, and easy.

You're completely misguided about anything Marx and Engels had said. Never mind Lenin, who didn't give a **** about the world outside of Russia.
User avatar #134 to #130 - alfjnn
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
"And still, there was a National government, which is against true Marxist Communism"

You blatantly said that for proper communism to exist, you cannot have a government.

Lack of Government, by definition, is Anarchy.
#137 to #134 - tomthehippie
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
No. Try reading. No NATIONAL government.

That does not mean no county or city government. In fact I stated several times that the "Communist" utopia was made of world wide CITY or COUNTY level governments and nothing beyond that.

Seriously, try actually reading. It helps you to understand what people are saying.

"There has never been a true Communist country, every country that has become "Communist" has in fact been Stalinist. The simple fact is that Communism was never meant to be applied at a national level, the "Communist Utopia" that Lennon and Marx wanted was a world wide community level communism. No government above city or perhaps county level. "

"And still, there was a National government, which is against true Marxist Communism, which holds the ideal of government being done purely at the city or county level world wide."

Here's hoping you can actually comprehend basic English this time around.
User avatar #138 to #137 - alfjnn
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Country = National.

Please don't tell me you're getting anal about semantics.

Also That's not what Lenin and Marx Wanted.
Read the ******* manifesto, man. Lenin and Marx were two completely different people with different ideals. Lenin didn't give a **** about the world outside of Russia.

I'm reading what you're saying. But you're absolutely wrong. Hell, you're even using the wrong Lenin.

Read the Manifesto, and then come back to the internet.

A country is a Nation, dude. Don't be ridiculous.

And why are you insulting me bro?
I'm just pointing out why you're wrong, and telling you to read the Manifesto.
#141 to #138 - tomthehippie
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
COUNTY, NOT COUNTRY.

Seriously *******, if you don't want to be insulted, TRY READING.

I never said COUNTRY, I said COUNTY. A COUNTY is a collection of cities that is smaller than a state or territory, ect.

And no, I'm not getting anal about semantics, I'm getting anal because you keep trying to argue against things I'm NOT SAYING.

******* retard.
User avatar #142 to #141 - alfjnn
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Pardon me. English is not my first language.

Even then you're still wrong, county or borough, whatever you want to call it.

Read the manifesto bro. Seriously. You have no idea what you are talking about.
www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/sw/course/mscp.pdf
User avatar #145 to #141 - alfjnn
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
And relax guy.
You're getting mad as **** over virtually nothing.

I'm not arguing anything, I'm just telling you to read a ******* book before you say things that aren't true.
#139 to #138 - tomthehippie
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #126 to #124 - alfjnn
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I understand completely. I'm just pointing out that without the will of all 7 Billion Humans on earth, Marxism is impossible. Marxism also said nothing about globalization.

Lenin only cared about a Russian Communist State, he had no interests in the world beyond Russia. He was a Nationalist.
That was the whole ******* point of the revolution.

Have you not read the manifesto?
User avatar #129 to #124 - alfjnn
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
>inb4 communism still needs to be stateless.
Then Communism cannot exist without being anarchic.

You'll have to accept that Communism, as it stands, is not only an economical standing, but also a political standing.

Marx said nothing about Communism and States.

Same way Lenin said nothing about Communism outside of Russia.
User avatar #69 to #55 - itrooztrooperdown
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Communism/Socialism/Anarchy are all utopic ideas. They would work in a island with a population of 20 friends. Atleast somebody tried. These sytems are wrong. They are as wrong as our current system of living. There is always an edge to get things better than we have them. Maybe, hopefully, in the future, people will look at us and think about our primitive system of living as we look and think about medieval politics now.
#73 to #69 - flufflepuff
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
A truly Utopic government is anarchy.
we don't need to pay taxes if we're all delightful enough to pay for our roads ourselves.
we wouldn't need a military, no war.
no cops, no crime.
people wouldn't need to be watched.

Communism, just like all government, was made under the assumption that people need to be given rules to operate under. With this very assumption, it fails.
User avatar #95 to #73 - admiralen
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
i know its an ideal and all, but people wont stop being assholes just cause you make a good society
User avatar #81 to #55 - fictionaddiction
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
the actual problem is that we never realy had any success in establishing a goverment that works on al large scale. in todays society are winner and looser, rich and poor, and in the future there will be only a few winner and the rest will be the looser. The goverment can't controll the economy anymore, in fact, global player, the bosses of the economy have much more influence on the goverment then most people are aware of. and even if you say : " look, western society, most people are healthy and have a job and are not poor" then there is still the rest of the world that suffers from sweatshops and polution and poverty. In fact every success of western culture (in short : making its people happy by easy access to resources and food and water and electricity) was only possible by exploiting developing countries.
#90 to #81 - anon id: 31ad45c8
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Oh look, the old "somebody will inevitably have all the wealth" argument. Marx tried that a century and a half ago, and we're not any closer to it today. In other economic systems, you get money by forcibly taking it from others. In capitalism, you get it by freely trading goods and services. I.E. the only way to get all the money is by making others' lives unimaginably better, and even then they can barter with all the goods that they'll have.

As for every success of western culture (aside from the Industrial Revolution and the majority of modern inventions that rely upon machine power more than human/animal power), cheap labor comes from a supply and demand imbalance. Overpopulated foreign countries can only blame themselves for trying to expand before working their way to success. If not for the Western "exploiters," even more of them would be jobless and starving.
#307 to #90 - anon id: 11d30272
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
so communism and socialism rants and ********** expand from simple lighthearted jokes of smoke breaks in the content
User avatar #112 to #55 - alfjnn
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I grew up in a Communist nation.
Twas a very silly place.
#67 to #55 - anon id: 3b571eae
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I should point out that the world has only relly experimented with a few different types of socialism. Most of the "communist" countries are based off of the Stalinism. So it seems a shame to not try to make an inherintly better system because the first few have failed. whereas communism will always have more control over the citizen, it does not necessarily mean that it has to turn into a toteltarian system. There are checks that can be put in place. Not to mention how many failed governments there have been that were based on capitalism. I do not think you are making a fair assessment. Its like attempting something 5 times (almost the same way) and then claiming its impossible when you fail.
#57 to #55 - anon id: 5e861701
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
It's not only that but you create a people who are generally lazy.
Why would you study/work harder and longer then someone else if you earn little to nothing more then what he does?
Pure socialism and communism are always going to fail in reality because people will get lazy and/or try to live off of the system. Where I'm from we have that problem. A lot of people just do nothing all day and live off of the welfare they get. In others words off of the taxpayers. The taxpayers pay a standard of 21% of their salary already, but it goes up to 55% for some people. This is just insane. The entire thing is going to ****, economy is failing because everyone with money/brains is getting the **** out of here. And all they do is keep complaining that big corporations/factories are moving out instead of looking at the stupid rules and what the politicians are doing wrong...
#58 to #57 - anon id: 5e861701
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
(continued: still me)
And we're supposed to be a first world country? I feel like I live in a country filled with idiots.
This is like my life motto right now: "70% of the population is retarded."
And the worst part is that I actually think it's more than 70%
#66 to #58 - tittylovin
+4 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#190 to #55 - anon id: eb6adf70
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
socialism, communism, capitalism are all man-made laws, if we follow God's law then we will prosper, live peacefully and happily through generation over generation, come... and join us in Kingdom of God
User avatar #210 to #190 - ningyoaijin
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
******* Christians...
User avatar #153 to #55 - garymotherfingoak
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
France

/thread
#421 to #153 - anon id: bffd7462
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
Greece

//thread
User avatar #188 to #153 - hpnerd
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
France is socialist?
#144 to #55 - anon id: e1c75734
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Denmark is pretty socialistic, i don't see use having major problems=)
User avatar #189 to #144 - hpnerd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Scandinavian countries are exceptions to rules due to their economy. They have low city populations, low financial sectors, and high agrarian systems. It means that socialism could work better (as it works best in more rural areas).
#105 to #55 - dwarfman
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
What does this have to do with Socialism? It states hands-on leadership gets the job done. This is true in war (Alexander), in politics (Gandhi), and the work place (CostCo).
#161 - mudkipfucker
Reply +46 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
fixed
#385 to #161 - anon id: bd885a01
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
now, what shall we put instead of the stone?
#345 to #161 - leeroy
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
made a tiny improvement
User avatar #347 to #345 - mudkipfucker
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I thought of adding that but I forgot to
#150 - crazyolitis
Reply +36 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
ITT: people who thinks this is about socialism/communism, despite it actually being about leadership.

User avatar #183 to #150 - pianoasis
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Why would it be about communism if communism requires a non-leading leader as well?
#195 to #183 - batwill **User deleted account**
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Why would you lead communists when leaders lead lead jobs but lead with a lead fist?
User avatar #217 to #195 - exclamation
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
I can't make sense of this myself!
User avatar #192 to #183 - crazyolitis
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
If a leader's non-leading it isn't really a leader, is it?
User avatar #193 to #192 - pianoasis
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Pretty much just a dick who tells everyone what to do.
User avatar #194 to #193 - crazyolitis
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Ah, I see.
#338 - whitprather
Reply +33 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Hello my name is whit and i am new. I recently downloaded a huge reaction folder but alas i CANNOT figure out how to put pictures/gifs in my comments. Could someone pleaseeee help me? thanks
User avatar #350 to #338 - angelmatvey
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
What he said, you just have to get enough thumbs on your comments.
User avatar #341 to #338 - klokwork
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
you have too be at a certain comment level, just make good comments and it'll let you post gifs and pics.
#362 to #338 - DrWeird
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(04/29/2013) [-]
Welcome to Funnyjunk, newfriend. Just remember: you're here forever.
Welcome to Funnyjunk, newfriend. Just remember: you're here forever.
User avatar #416 to #362 - dyldoemackinson
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/30/2013) [-]
"Quick, name 10 things that aren't Jackie Chan!"
"Toothpaste, pizza, lamps, Jackie Chan-"



BWAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH