Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#551 - gernab (04/22/2013) [-]
In 2010 358 deaths from rifles and on average 2,500 deaths from choking. Heue hehehe ueuhehueheuuheeeu heueuheehu.
In 2010 358 deaths from rifles and on average 2,500 deaths from choking. Heue hehehe ueuhehueheuuheeeu heueuheehu.
User avatar #564 to #551 - Crusader (04/22/2013) [-]
More people eat than shoot guns.
User avatar #571 to #564 - gernab (04/22/2013) [-]
Yeah but no one intends to fucking choke, people intent to shoot guns, and people.
User avatar #593 to #571 - Crusader (04/22/2013) [-]
Still, it's a logical fallacy.
Of course more people are going to choke, because more people eat.
It's like saying "There are more people with cars in America than in Canada"
Of course there is, there are more people in america than Canada.
User avatar #619 to #593 - gernab (04/22/2013) [-]
Caution makes it so less people choke, guns are intended to kill food is meant for eating. Additionally I was including rifles alone but including all guns the deaths are around 20-30 thousand. But people feel its necessary to blame a certain weapon because the looks. More people eating means little to nothing when there is no intent to choke. But even then knives contribute to more murders than rifles.
User avatar #641 to #619 - Crusader (04/22/2013) [-]
It's still a fallacy.
Saying more people choke than are killed by rifles is not a proper comparison, because there are more people eating than owning guns.
It doesn't matter the amount of caution, the base numbers are so grossly different that there are going to be massive margins of difference.
User avatar #674 to #641 - gernab (04/22/2013) [-]
This post compared the two regardless stating its a fallacy simply isn't true less people own cars than eat but still more people die in car crashes. And even then judging this by how lethal they are. You can't give accurate data when you don't even consider every variable. You cannot simply becomes irrelevant just to prove you point. Even more people fucking breath air but nobody dies from air. This isn't about more or less this is about how many people die from it. Less people die from rifles than choking that is what this compares so stick to it.
 Friends (0)