Upload
YouTube Videos
Funny Pictures
Funny GIFs
Funny Text
Funny Movies
Login or register
Your Posts
Login or register
Login / Create Account
Create Account
Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
Click to Create Account
Login to FJ
reset password
Stay logged in
Click to Login
Log in/Sign with Facebook.
Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
Create Channel
WholesomeMemes
vidyagaems
4chan
aww
politics
Tumblr-Content
animemanga
twitter
marvel
dccomics
cute
CartoonGoodness
fallout
FJNN
UnlimitFateWorks
tf2
cat
gameofthrones
art
Daily-Jokes
MemeComps
starwars
OneForAll
polandball
dank-webms
cringe-channel
overwatch-time
darksoulstime
Raven
videogames
RainbowSixSiege
Randomthoughts
overwatch
oc-comic-makers
pokemon
loudhouse
dungeons-n-drags
CuteKemonomimis
Remaining character count: 4000
Spoiler Image
[ + ]
Image or Video File:
Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
Record voice message?
0:00
Click to start recording.
Enter Captcha Code:
Scroll to comment?
Back to the content 'Muricaaaa'
Refresh
Options
asd
2
new threads.
1
new replies.
#276
-
pivotmasterdm
Reply
+20
(04/21/2013)
[-]
Ok here we go.
Kinder eggs are banned cause children would choke on the candies inside. Not saying they should still be banned. But assault rifles don't hurt anyone. The shooter is the one hurting people. Forgive me, as I'm about to reference other arguments without the ability to quote the exact person.
"If guns kill people, spoons make people fat. Cars get in accidents. It is the person holding the gun that kills people. They make the decision to kill the people."
"Saying guns kill people is like picking up a cat and throwing it on someone and then claiming the cat attacked you."
In short, guns shouldn't be banned because it's not the guns fault. It's the decisions of the shooter that put people in harms way.
Rant over.
Go on with your life.
#928
to #276
-
anon
id:
0d03f21f
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
That's the stupidest comment I've read in years. "Guns don't kill people, people do". It's obvious that if there's a school massacre, and the person responsible has a better, more dangerous weapon he's more likely to kill more people. If you ban automatic weapons, he wouldn't be able to shoot that many people.
However, do as you please - I'm just glad I don't live in a country where some people are so ******* dumb they have to ban kinder-eggs to protect their safety.
#539
to #276
-
anon
id:
10baf789
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
When anybody with any mentality (and or mental illness, life issues etc) can easily get a hold of a legal gun to do what he pleases with it, means your law system is pretty poorly designed. But since america has a strong economy based on gun production and sells i doubt we will see any changes any time soon. It is less probable to have gun related deaths somewhere where guns aren't handed out to everybody. So now is America really interested in it's population's safety?
#589
to #539
-
anon
id:
9d62e428
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
Gun deaths will just be replaced if not surpassed by violent deaths in general (knives, for example).
#624
to #589
-
anon
id:
10baf789
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
it's far easier to pull the trigger of an automated fire arm and kill a dozen people, then stab them or violently kill them.
#789
to #624
-
anon
id:
f56c4639
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
guess what ******* retard, they used
semi
automatic guns, not full auto there is a ******* difference, and guess what else ppl in the military dont even go full automatic, it is less accurate. now before you go and bitch about it, yea i know they have 50 cals but that is not what was used or has been ever used here on us soil to kill innocent civilians
#444
to #276
-
anon
id:
41483da3
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
It's a shame how blinded you guys are to guns. Just look at your own gangs. Why do you have troubles with them? Because guns can easily be acquired and they can shoot you right back.
#519
to #444
-
brisineo
#173
on comments
Rank
#173
Reply
+6
(04/22/2013)
[-]
Using gang violence as an argument is pretty invalid mostly because gangs majorly get their weapons through illegal means, therefore making any gun control invalid. Not to mention a few of them have military-grade, fully automatic weaponry, which is completely UNAVAILABLE to obtain legally for any average citizen.
Not to mention, if gun control is strictly enforced like the probation amendment did on alcohol, America is in a unique position because the black market and smuggling jobs would boom and illegally obtained guns would be everywhere.
#922
to #519
-
anon
id:
0d03f21f
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
That's funny, because that's not the case in any other western civilized country where you have gun control. But I guess it's because it's just America, after all you had to ban kinder-eggs because you ate it's ******* content.
#935
to #922
-
brisineo
#173
on comments
Rank
#173
Reply
+1
(04/22/2013)
[-]
There is a very distinct difference that America has and Europe doesn't, and that's a major organized crime-run black market and trade route.
No matter what, as long as there is an illegal substance in demand, there will be people who smuggle it here, because we're conveniently placed next to places where guns and drugs are made and sold like candy, and have international access to distribute.
Also, while gang violence is a problem, it's a statistical fact that it occurs a lot more in areas with stricter gun control, such as in LA and Chicago, while in Texas, where everyone is armed, there's practically none in comparison, even though it's on the border with Mexico. Here's a picture with a bunch more facts to read up on.
PS. The Kinder Eggs have been unbanned since March. The controversy was because of a bunch of sue-happy soccer moms who didn't know the heimlich.
#1030
to #935
-
anon
id:
0d03f21f
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
I was done writing a reply for you, but my PC turned itself off. So instead of the long post that got deleted, I'll just write you a little recap :P
I'm sure there's a big black market in the US, but I am also confident that the creation of stricter gun laws would make it harder to illegally smuggle in arms, and illegally sell them.
Gang violence may be a problem, but I think connection this to guns among the civilians is a bit far fetched. Yes, it is a statistical fact, but if you look more closely into it, there's probably a bigger connection between population density and gang violence than between guns per capita and gang violence. I think that even wealth and unemployment could check in before guns per capita. I do not know, I just think it sounds reasonable.
I'm sure you're right about the Kinder eggs, but I have to laugh. USA is the only country who could ban Kinder eggs because it's dangerous to eat for children in the first place.
#296
to #276
-
garymuthafuknoak
Reply
-5
(04/21/2013)
[-]
Yes, but if you don't have the gun there in the first place it makes it less easier to shoot up your school :D
#356
to #296
-
stigman
**User deleted account**
Reply
+1
(04/21/2013)
[-]
That makes no difference though. If there were no guns for the mad men to use, then what's stopping them from just using a stick to kill kids.
#429
to #356
-
benvinnyandmia
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
But if you go to a school with a stick then you won't kill 20 kids.
No, I don't think all guns should be banned, but I do think there should be restrictions on them.
#1301
to #429
-
stigman
**User deleted account**
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
depends what kind of stick he has.
#587
to #429
-
revanthewin
Reply
+1
(04/22/2013)
[-]
If you go to a school with a bomb, though...
#298
to #296
-
pivotmasterdm
Reply
+3
(04/21/2013)
[-]
What's stopping them from doing the same thing with bombs? Man will always find another way to kill man.
#556
to #298
-
anon
id:
10baf789
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
That takes us to our next lesson: "Education"
#308
to #298
-
garymuthafuknoak
Reply
-4
(04/21/2013)
[-]
Like I said. Less easier. Pretty sure you would need to go to quite the extent to get a bomb that will actually cause casualties.
Whereas, with a gun, you just need to go in your dad closet.
#557
to #308
-
bothemastaofall
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
>"less easier"
What's the word for that again?
#432
to #308
-
Laddie
Reply
+1
(04/22/2013)
[-]
You can literally walk over to Walmart and get all the supplies you need to make a bomb.
#459
to #432
-
garymuthafuknoak
Reply
-2
(04/22/2013)
[-]
so if there is no guns, everyone is going to be blowing each other the **** up?
just like all the other first world countries with strict gun laws right?
#600
to #459
-
anon
id:
9d62e428
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
Violent maniacs who perform mass shootings will. Going back to your original argument, are you seriously going to pretend there are no gangs or terrorists in countries with gun control?
#314
to #308
-
pivotmasterdm
Reply
0
(04/21/2013)
[-]
You're implying that every father owns a gun. You can also make mustard gas out of house hold items that everyone owns, which is easier than guns.
#330
to #314
-
garymuthafuknoak
Reply
-5
(04/21/2013)
[-]
It was a figure of speech. I wasn't saying every dad will have a gun I'm just saying it's much easier to acquire a weapon in a society where it's common.
And besides, mustard gas isn't even much of a killer as it is an irritant. When was the last time you heard someone using ******* mustard gas?
#788
to #330
-
deadrifler
Reply
0
(04/22/2013)
[-]
"Mustard gas is a minor irritant"
Yes, a chemical weapon banned under the CWC that is an extremely powerful mutagenic is only a minor bother. You just went from trying to defend your position to full-retard.
Just because a weapon does not kill(Mustard gas was only lethal in about 1% of cases) does not mean it is only "irritating". It was commonly used as an area denial and it could linger for days in one location. Granted, previous poster who mentioned mustard gas probably did not know this.
I would rather be exposed to mustard gas than phosgene though, because at least then you would know you were exposed. Phosgene smells much like fresh cut grass or hay, so you would probably not even realize exposure until already displaying symptoms.
#339
to #330
-
pivotmasterdm
Reply
0
(04/21/2013)
[-]
My point is that there are easier things to aquire than guns, such as knives, bombs or chemical agents.
Back to the content 'Muricaaaa'
Top in 24 Hours
When you're shy, but you also have a crush on someone
262
3h ago
grouchy efficient Fly
421
3h ago
marvelous possible Goldfish
499
4h ago
overfortress
385
4h ago
Reeee
215
3h ago
Puppy slide
192
3h ago
Deploy the Boy
308
4h ago
They call me the "Master of Romance™"
370
3h ago
This geometry ...
487
5h ago
easy afraid Fly
89
1h ago
What the fact?
435
5h ago
Finland Cancelling Basic Income
81
1h ago
graceful pastoral Rabbit
133
2h ago
By condemning the previous, we could have stopped the following.
467
6h ago
phone
247
3h ago
Lemme toot you a good song
351
6h ago
tenuous outrageous Horse
110
2h ago
Box maze
406
6h ago
funny aback helpful Rail
135
2h ago
THE MAGIC OF THE INTERNET
247
4h ago
watch
203
4h ago
some god of war memes
428
7h ago
brutal
834
10h ago
Panja is over qualification
148
3h ago
Melon
777
11h ago
How Do We Stop The Train?
79
1h ago
Jane Lane
234
6h ago
ARE YOU ----ING SORRY?!
141
3h ago
This is still one of my all time favourite gif
55
1h ago
Vault Luck Roll
304
8h ago
macabre clammy Kouprey
184
4h ago
Speaking Dutch
353
7h ago
responsible outgoing elastic Mallard
49
1h ago
She wants the best
631
9h ago
How to be tall
72
1h ago
Give it All
141
3h ago
Combat in God of War is like painting with a brush
42
43m ago
purple previous Ibex
309
7h ago
Crab
480
10h ago
Kane Lives in Every Timeline. Gotta find him!
139
4h ago