Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#27 - Ihazfunkitty
Reply +87 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
because dumb kids eat the whole egg (including toy) and choke, the parents then sue them for having little *****...
#1276 to #27 - anon id: 01f920af
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
We have them in Australia, and this has never happened.
#692 to #27 - sweateagle
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
HEY! If guns don't kill people, people kill people; toasters don't toast toast, toast toasts toast.
HEY! If guns don't kill people, people kill people; toasters don't toast toast, toast toasts toast.
User avatar #1185 to #692 - StupidInTheFace
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
toasters don't toast toast, toasters toast bread.
User avatar #135 to #27 - rifee
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
I will never understand why parents don't actually teach the kids about the thing they are giving them, when they know they have never seen it before and obviously have low mental capactity.
User avatar #531 to #135 - ipaintmyfloor
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
Parents acting like parents? Not in America.
#29 to #27 - wakingeyes
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
So why haven't people sued companies that manufacture assault weapons?
User avatar #993 to #29 - eliteqtip
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
Because ''assault weapons'' don't exist in the real world.
User avatar #33 to #29 - sarphog
Reply +26 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
Because they're too big to eat
#37 to #33 - dstone
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #32 to #29 - Ihazfunkitty
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
if i recall correctly, somewhere in the constitution its stated that every american is allowed to have a gun. i dont know for sure though.
User avatar #55 to #32 - fireprincess
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
The second amendment to the constitution is the right to keep and bear arms. So you are correct.
#200 to #55 - anon id: 6fad09b9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/21/2013) [-]
Except it is only if you are in a well regulated militia. Just sayin'
#468 to #200 - anon id: ed0c2543
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
"well-regulated militia" doesn't mean what you want it to mean.

"well-regulated" means orderly or soldier-like; the discipline of soldiers. It doesn't mean regulated by laws.

"Militia" refers not to the National Guard, but to every male American, 18 or older, willing and able to defend this country in a time of need. This has been upheld by the supreme court.

The 2nd Amendment is not a collective right, it is an individual right. And the prefatory clause, the part that goes "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State..." is simply an example of why the 2nd Amendment was instituted. The right protected by the 2nd Amendment is not dependent on the need for a Miltia.

TL;DR - You're an ignorant, uneducated gun-grabber, apparently willing to infringe upon my right that shall not be infringed. Ever heard the phrase "All enemies, foreign and domestic?" You're a domestic enemy to the Constitution.
#568 to #468 - revanthewin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/22/2013) [-]
yfw
yfw