Well then I suppose at the end of the race - #90252863 added by heraske at Statists

#10 - anon id: 6ca8daca

Reply0

(04/21/2013)[-]

This is nice, I admit, but it doesn't justify what they did. Violating rights to catch one man isn't forgivable through one act of kindness. I'm sure police states around the world have these sort of stories. We just choose to ignore them because the actions of one man won't define the country.
A hair in your soup doesn't ruin the soup, and putting salt on a turd won't make it a meal.

#47 to #10 - alfjnn

Reply+3

(04/21/2013)[-]

>mfw growing up in Yugoslavia
>mfw you think America is ******.
>mfw no face.

Get a life, op.

#24 to #10 - alalalalal

Reply+7

(04/21/2013)[-]

A hair in my soup ruins it op

#11 to #10 - pockyrin

Reply+4

(04/21/2013)[-]

how did they violate anyones rights by saying they should stay indoors while a guy with a gun was running around.

#19 to #11 - dingojohn

Reply-2

(04/21/2013)[-]

"When a guy with a gun is running around"

Isn't people with guns pretty widespread in America?
Isn't the defensive line of any gun-owner "We have to be able to protect ourselves", but as soon as some guy with a gun who killed some people is running around, everyone has to hide in their houses?

#31 to #19 - therealtjthemedic

Reply+1

(04/21/2013)[-]

What about a terrorist with explosives?

#39 to #31 - heraske

Reply-2

(04/21/2013)[-]

Well then I suppose at the end of the race of being chased, he's going to blow up.

#40 to #39 - therealtjthemedic

Reply-2

(04/21/2013)[-]

Well then I suppose at the end of the race of being chased, he's going to blow up.
Without the italics it isn't even funny.
With it's like a 3/4 out of ten.

#41 to #40 - heraske

Reply-3

(04/21/2013)[-]

You're a 3/4 out of ten.

#13 to #11 - anon id: 6ca8daca

Reply0

(04/21/2013)[-]

That was perfectly reasonable, entering people's homes without the homeowners permission however, is not. Pointing an assault rifle in an innocent persons face and demanding to be let into their house is extremely unjustified.

#14 to #13 - pockyrin

Reply0

(04/21/2013)[-]

Well if they were entering people's homes while they weren't home, I'd say given the circumstances it was necessary, he might have been hiding out in a house and threaten/kill the family when they came home. However yea the second part no, pointing a gun into a families face is horrible.

#15 to #14 - anon id: 6ca8daca

Reply0

(04/21/2013)[-]

Well I'm glad we reached an agreement on the matter. Good day to you, sir.