Ugliest car?. .. I must have terrible taste in cars, because I think that lamborghini looks badass. Ugliest car? I must have terrible taste in cars because think that lamborghini looks badass
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (683)
[ 683 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #9 - iyr
Reply +521 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
I must have terrible taste in cars, because I think that lamborghini looks badass.
User avatar #333 to #9 - gandalfthered
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
complete ripoff from most newer DeTomasso's
#364 to #333 - xzayviaaeyeres
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
DeTomaso is still in business?
#263 to #9 - anon id: d6e7e5f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
A concept design enthusiast might find it clashy, busy, and uninspired. Still, some critics are too conservative for such a futuristic design and must've been like "2edgy4me". It's not supposed to hold the traditional elegance of the previous lambos. It's in its own realm of concept, and it's pretty badass any way you look at it.
#272 to #9 - anon id: fb238d2d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
So is that all-time or this year? You'd be smoking something to think a GEO(of any kind) looks better than that. Even if it's not all-time I don't care much for the look of the Dodge Neon, it just looks overly generic so I have to wonder what the comparison base is. It might be a claim that holds some water when comparing among other super cars, but that's my take.
#274 to #272 - anon id: 24f19f17
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
nou
#682 to #9 - anon id: c1039fe2
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Same, I would jack off a hobo for that car.
User avatar #736 to #9 - tehlulzbringer
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
you're absolutely right
you have terrible taste in cars
#737 to #736 - iyr
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/02/2014) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #128 to #9 - maxismahname
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I wanna have sex with all Lamborghinis. I orgasm just by looking at them
User avatar #441 to #128 - admiralen
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
your underwear must be disgusting
User avatar #480 to #441 - luckiestcharms
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
what underwear
User avatar #486 to #480 - admiralen
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
your dick must be disgusting
User avatar #593 to #441 - maxismahname
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Yes it is
User avatar #3 - radiohazard
Reply +421 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
was it rated by IGN?
#671 to #3 - anon id: ef2f4879
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
remember you cant spell ignorance without ign
#630 to #3 - liquidz
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #430 to #3 - lejontronman
Reply +27 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
10/10 It's okay.

- IGN
User avatar #14 to #3 - jubnik
Reply +96 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
0/10 not like skyrim at all
#15 - cramperzombie
Reply +321 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
Ugliest car in America?

Who the hell wouldn't want a Batmobile?
#47 to #15 - anon id: 2ca263e1
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
it says "in the world"...but nice to know you havent changed america
User avatar #442 to #47 - admiralen
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
>implying america isnt the whole world
#685 to #47 - imnotkickthecat
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#470 to #15 - anon id: 5bc35d3a
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I would want a batmobile. Just not a batmotank.
#709 to #15 - matralith
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#291 to #15 - fuzzysixx
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I think you meant this.
#21 - djequalizee
Reply +194 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
I don't understand why anyone would dislike this car.
User avatar #24 to #21 - cousin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
That car is sexy.
#52 to #21 - sirdickhousen **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#191 to #21 - anon id: ab8527c9
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
because it is not elegant
#275 to #21 - anon id: d6e7e5f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
It's kinda... cliche, overdone, uninspired. In my opinion, it's definitely not ugly, but it's not elegant either. Think of a movie with the most stunning visual effects and thrilling action scenes. Critics ain't gonna give a **** worth of a rating if the movie has huge plot holes, lack of context, poor character interaction, and no flow in the storyline.
User avatar #276 to #275 - djequalizee
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Yeah, i guess it kind of feels like they tried too hard

Now if it HOVERED, all those little things would make sense.
#289 to #276 - anon id: d6e7e5f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
If it could drive, fly and hover, then I wouldn't mind if it looked like a giant flaming turd. But a nice anterior would be nice.
User avatar #383 to #275 - viicstaar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
i.e. transformers 2
#312 to #21 - rzhang
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
it's because it got revealed at the same time Ferrari and McLaren revealed their brand new super cars, whereas Lambo just re-skinned an Aventador
#473 to #21 - thenewneone
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
It's black.
User avatar #556 to #21 - theycallmeloye
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Because it's out of our price range haha. (But that's about it.)
User avatar #680 to #21 - jebuss
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I know! I mean it's practical as there's enough room in the back for the kids. The top car on the other hand, has no space at all!
#157 to #21 - freeyourmind
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
it's a little over-stylized to be honest
#683 to #157 - BroadSword
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Thats what she said.
Thats what she said.
User avatar #161 to #157 - djequalizee
Reply -17 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
You can't even criticize that **** unless your car is better.
User avatar #394 to #161 - vigilum
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
That's like saying a movie critic can't criticize a movie because he hasn't made a great movie.
User avatar #704 to #394 - djequalizee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Look above
#162 to #161 - freeyourmind
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
sorry I forgot the rules, please forgive me
User avatar #164 to #162 - djequalizee
Reply -6 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
You'll have to earn my respect back through cheap laborious tasks.
User avatar #643 to #161 - ilovehitler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
...are you an idiot?
I'm completely serious.
That's like saying you can't dislike food because you don't make better food.
That's like saying you can't dislike movies because you don't make better movies.
That's like saying you can't dislike books because you haven't made a better book.

I could go on and on with the comparisons, but I think you get the idea.
User avatar #703 to #643 - djequalizee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I was being sarcastic.
User avatar #705 to #703 - ilovehitler
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Suuuure you were
User avatar #706 to #705 - djequalizee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Look at the response below. I was really being serious about telling him to be my work slave as well.
User avatar #707 to #706 - ilovehitler
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Because he started the joke there, and you followed along with it.
User avatar #708 to #707 - djequalizee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Alright then.

I guess i can't make you think a certain way.
#22 - DeathKnight
Reply +156 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
this car is sexy as ****
#28 to #22 - magerogue
Reply -20 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
That car looks ******* horrible. Looks like a toy car a little 6 year old kid would play with.
User avatar #33 to #28 - WMDxVeLoCiTy
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
but that 6 year old is the popular kid in pre-school
User avatar #78 to #33 - hanakoikezawa
Reply -8 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
But that was pre-school
#268 to #28 - RipperMan
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
who the **** wouldn't want to drive full sized hotwheels?
#349 to #22 - larryqa **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #372 to #22 - enchantedkid
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
all hail the bluest
User avatar #373 to #22 - enchantedkid
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
**** my eyes
#5 - robertelee
Reply +128 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
I will just leave this here because i has to be pretty ******* high up the list
User avatar #19 to #5 - IAmManbearpig
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
that's not even a practical design. it is not aerodynamic in the slightest. wind must be a bitch.
User avatar #144 to #5 - Rolyat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
It's an amazing car
User avatar #418 to #144 - davidavidson
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
no
#303 to #5 - anon id: dac3f143
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Lol somebody local has that car and always drives down our house so we call it...
Drumroll plz....


trash can car
#309 to #303 - anon id: 085be5a3
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
You guys must be really badass.
User avatar #447 to #5 - infamoustrapper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I Hate the back windows. They curve around the car, but only on 1 side. Who thought that was a good idea???
#513 to #5 - anon id: f1d1527c
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
This is my favourite car. ._.
User avatar #678 to #5 - amsel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Nice box; where's the car that came in it?
User avatar #109 to #5 - scarmanagent
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Cars like that look like mobile shoeboxes.
#279 to #5 - thoughtbubble
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
*shiver* Who would drive such a poorly designed car?
User avatar #449 to #5 - EvilWolf
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
i deeply despise box shaped cars
#297 to #5 - lamarisagoodname
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I hate that car with a furious passion, but It'll likely be my car in 10 years
#145 - dexterpwnsyou
Reply +75 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Im just gonna leave this ************ right here
User avatar #313 to #145 - envinite
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
It's like an abomination of Pontiac GTO and regular Cabbie
#156 to #145 - thuntking **User deleted account**
+12 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #160 to #156 - dexterpwnsyou
Reply +22 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
i am so sorry.
#163 to #160 - thuntking **User deleted account**
+11 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#306 to #156 - thestrangestboner
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
A moment of silence for this brave, brave man.
User avatar #436 to #156 - PlagueDoctor
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
you are playing the dating game on the legendary setting, my man
User avatar #308 to #156 - herptyderpies
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Asstek
#259 to #156 - fukkentyranitar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
why?
#188 to #145 - sixty
Reply +116 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#98 - fyeahpkmn
Reply +86 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
No you see this ******? its an Aurora.. 1957 butt **** ugly
#618 to #98 - anon id: b1cce504
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
that car is gloriously beautiful !?
#119 to #98 - tacotuesdy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
That car was a glimpse into the future.
User avatar #321 to #98 - sundaywave
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Was it designed by Salvador Dali?
User avatar #507 to #321 - rieskimo
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Actually it was designed by a priest as kind of a "starter car" for young adults. It has all foam-filled paneling and the windshield(windscreen) is designed that if there is a collision or a short stop that the head would have to travel a longer distance before it struck the windshield. One of the first cars designed with safety features.
#101 to #98 - Spikeydeath
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
i love it
#105 to #101 - fyeahpkmn
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #112 to #101 - largeheadphones
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Me to....
#131 - BmanX
Reply +84 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
I hold so much disdain for this ugly thing.
User avatar #172 to #131 - xxkelevraxx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
yep... this thing is UGLY. I want to run them over in my truck
#402 to #131 - anon id: 68bdde74
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
ITS NOT EVEN ******* SYMMETRICAL!! WHAT THE ****!
User avatar #661 to #131 - commandermunkee
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Have to agree with you there. So many ugly shapes, the round corners are just bulky, and the boxy chassis already makes it ugly.
#236 to #131 - infinitesinz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
The only thing I find interesting about this car is how the window wraps around it, idk, looks futuristic.
User avatar #330 to #236 - BmanX
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
That makes me hate it more. I think it just looks so stupid.
#390 - redorbit
Reply +79 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
you should see this **********
#419 to #390 - festinas
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#659 to #390 - piclesmeme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #477 to #390 - Cookiez
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
The ************
User avatar #557 to #390 - theycallmeloye
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Sheeeeeeeeeit
#482 to #390 - cblizard
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#408 to #390 - nephritho
Reply +20 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]